How did you pay? Credit/Debit card?

They are not popular on Trust Pilot which suggests it's a scam - https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/hidenda.com

Isn't the NTK out of time to create keeper liability?

The 10 minute grace period is a minimum not a maximum.

I bet it's a Jag, very common problem on those especially XF models. The electronics are shocking. If it was mine I'd be rejecting it and saving myself a whole host of issues further along as the electronics degrade further, oh and a heads up: never, ever disconnect the battery or you'll need to get it towed to a main dealer who will charge you £600 to 'reset the software' an utter rip off disguising a serious known fault with the whole range. Next time stick to German cars!

Ignore it

I believe the age for criminal responsibility is 10, happy to be corrected if that's not right.

If it smells like a lemon then it probably is, you have the right to reject the vehicle (I believe) as the faults have not been fixed by the dealer and you're within the timeframe. Did you pay cash or credit?

When was the default date?

Did you pay by credit card? If so do a section 75 chargeback.

Post up a redacted version of what you have, it's important to know. If it's a Council notice then it must be paid or it will escalate, if it's a Private Parking Company charge then you don't pay.

When did the debt default?

@CaramelbNO!!! No contact with the PPC at all unless you get a letter before claim.

I think the argument here is whether the vehicle was sold as a 2018 model or as a 2018 registered vehicle. If you can prove it was then you were misled and could be entitled to a partial refund, I think you're too late to reject the vehicle on the same grounds though. It's quite common to purchase a previous year's model as a late registration on a current year plate as it can save a lot over the newer model, especially if it's mostly cosmetic changes.

As the NTK is out of time to create keeper liability that's your strongest argument so just ignore (but keep) all their tripe unless you get a letter before claim, I doubt this will go anywhere though as they are on a hiding to nothing.

OK, that's a shame.

Isn't the NTK out of time to create keeper liability anyway?

Ignore everything (but keep it) unless you get a Letter Before Action. I doubt they would try this on in court

Post it up suitably redacted, does it say Penalty Charge or Parking Charge?

I have domestic CCTV and I had a stroppy neighbour who tried to go down this route with me even sending me a FOI request (laughable), I found out that as long as the captures off your own property are incidental there is no need to contact the ICO as long as your DVR overwrites your captures every 30 days or so, so you are not storing data beyond that very short period, they will never be interested and you are not liable to react to any queries regarding data protection. Additional: this is presuming you have static cameras, there is a law about PTZ (movable cameras) though.

So is there no out of time get out on this one then?

This is my 100th and final attempt at this, he needs to join the group himself and post as I haven't got a clue beyond typing text. 2022-11-02 MET NTK for 2022-10-13 yellow line infraction.pdf

He sent me a photo, no clue how to redact things, anyone help?

Quick question: remind me what the timings are for a NTK for an ANPR parking charge please? Incident was on 13/10/2022 and date of issue of NTK was 02/11/2022 I think it was received a few days ago.

Thanks all, I'll continue to advise him. No receipt for coffee but he paid by card so I'll suggest that as evidence he was there legitimately.