Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

A national day of anti DCA action!


mr.ton
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5465 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 232
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am starting this thread with the hope of building up a consensus of as many people as possible, were by we all agree on a national day of action against the DCA's.

What i mean by this is....say for example, we all agree that on Wednesday 24th June, everyone of us would contact the OFT & any other official authority we can think of to complain about DCA's.

If enough people did such a thing on a specific day, then it might have an effect & something might happen as a result?

I personally am sick of them now & especially after my war of words with BCW last week :mad:

The DCA's do seem to be getting more arrogant,rude & downright nasty in recent times - maybe thats a side effect of the recession etc...who knows?

Anyway..i could be whistling in the wind with this idea, but even still..i thought id bring the idea up to get the initial feedback etc...

Something needs to be done & Caggers need to join forces & agree/plan a day of direct action (nothing vigilante/violent or anything of the such) like what ive mentioned above.

 

Right Guys, above is the original post.

 

I believe that the point is, to bring to the attention of the OFT/BERR consumer concerns in a mass form, about DCA's 'Bad Business Practice'.

 

If we just focus on the DCA's themselves, nothing much will be acheived apart from disruption of a few.

 

I started a thread some time ago, about Link Financial Limited;

many members, both on here and on other sites wrote letters/emails of complaint.

Yes, it did take a long time to see the result; the OFT is a painfully slow moving mechanism.

But, eventually a result was obtained!

 

In order to gain any sort of impetus, we need at least 500/1000 complaints being sent the OFT/BERR and all on the same day.

http://www.berr.gov.uk/aboutus/ministerialteam/page40241.html

 

These Gov. bodies really do have to take notice of the General Consumer.

 

AC

Edited by angry cat
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi again all.............surely the crux of the matter is to get DCA licenses revoked...........due to bad business practises.......but just how do we do this?..........any legal experts out there?

 

iamspartacus

the debtors prayer "please forgive me my debts, and the ones who charged me the dreadful interest to begin with"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree angry cat.

 

However - what hurts a DCA most is the impact on its bottom line.

 

The DCA call center on the whole is a tool that is used to bully, intimidate and extort where they have no case (Otherwise they would write a letter) and is therefore fair game as far as I am concerned.

 

Interfering with the call center would have an immediate and direct effect on the business' cash flow and would have a much greater impact on practice than one thousand complaints to a dysfunctional and ineffective organisation like the OFT.

 

We should organise a whole spread of action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi again all.............surely the crux of the matter is to get DCA licenses revoked...........due to bad business practises.......but just how do we do this?..........any legal experts out there?

 

iamspartacus

the debtors prayer "please forgive me my debts, and the ones who charged me the dreadful interest to begin with"

 

COMPLAIN to the OFT, en mass!

 

5. Failure to comply with a requirement could lead to a fine of up to £50,000 and/or be grounds for revocation of a consumer credit licence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

spartacus is a legendary man who fought against the power or Rome, he was so loved by his comrades that when given amnesty if they would identify him they all stood together and said.............I AM SPARTACUS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...