Jump to content


Welcome Finance - This company needs to be banned.


tightbum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4575 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I thought it was the nice polite thing to do, afterall they hounded me something cronic when I lost my job, they didn't wish me luck then in finding new employment, just the decent human thing to do to wish them well.

 

A valid point, you should now add £10 to their bill for making the phone call

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dodgy Agreements = Waste Paper......they can always sell that :lol:

Beck

"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. one is by the Sword. The other is by Debt."

 

Barclaycard PPI Refund £4300:whoo:

Barclaycard = Mexican Stand Off

 

TSB = Mexican Stand Off

 

Santander = :mad2: MungyPup is coming to get yahh :mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

well this is the latest i can find

 

Published Date: 14 July 2009

By John Collingridge, City Reporter

 

 

STRICKEN sub-prime lender Cattles was last night locked in eleventh-hour talks with its banks and bondholders, as a key refinancing deadline looms.

The Batley company is desperately trying to secure the backing of a syndicate of 22 banks to refinance a £500m credit line, which expires today. If the company fails to win the backing of its creditors, it faces going into administration.

 

Last wee ADVERTISEMENT

[/url]

 

 

 

k the company defaulted on an interest payment on a £400m bond, leading ratings agency Fitch to downgrade its debt rating.

 

Analysts believe its talks with the syndicate of 22 banks, led by Royal Bank of Scotland, hinge on foreign banks being persuaded to roll over some of the debt.

 

One analyst said while UK banks are more likely to agree to roll over the debt, as they are under political pressure to maintain lending, foreign banks will be less sympathetic as they focus on domestic markets. "When businesses are in trouble, they hunker down on core markets," he said. "Why are they (foreign banks) going to commit to UK small-cap lending?"

 

Banks and bondholders are also understood to be locked in a debate over who ranks first should the company fall into administration. Banks argue they rank highest in payment priority, bondholders dispute this.

 

It has sacked six directors and parted company with chief executive David Postings after an independent investigation found serious flaws in the way it accounted for bad debts, blowing a potential £850m hole in its accounts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe its a .......Silent but deadly

Beck

"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. one is by the Sword. The other is by Debt."

 

Barclaycard PPI Refund £4300:whoo:

Barclaycard = Mexican Stand Off

 

TSB = Mexican Stand Off

 

Santander = :mad2: MungyPup is coming to get yahh :mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time for a Totty Bottle then :lol::lol:

Beck

"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. one is by the Sword. The other is by Debt."

 

Barclaycard PPI Refund £4300:whoo:

Barclaycard = Mexican Stand Off

 

TSB = Mexican Stand Off

 

Santander = :mad2: MungyPup is coming to get yahh :mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I just point out that whoever takes on the book debt, as someone will, MUST also accept the liabilities. A simple fact that makes me think that anyone who does take it on must either be completely unaware of what the books represent in the way of mis-sold PPI & unenforceable agreements....or are completely stark raving bonkers

Edited by JonCris
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I just point out that whoever takes on the book debt, as someone will, MUST also accept the liabilities. A simple fact that makes me think that anyone who does take it on must either be completely unaware of what the books represent in the way of mis-sold PPI & unenforceable agreements....or are completely stark raving bonkers

 

 

Is this a legal rule based on fact or just an assumption?

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4575 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...