Hankins Car Sales/lawgistics - 2010 Vauxhall Zafira 7 seater - court claim issued - not fit for purpose.

[dx100uk]

aha we know them well

always on the side of the trader watchout, they pull tricks trying to catch you out.

 

dx

 

[dx100uk]

so the car was outside of 30 days return. but inside of 6mts.

its down to them to produce a report that proves whatever happened was not present at time of purchase .

they have one chance to repair, else you can reject the car.

 

seems like you rushed a bit here issuing the court claim?

did you write a letter of complaint first? 

did you send a letter of claim after that FIRST giving them 30 days before you issued the claim?

 

 

[dx100uk]

the time lines and evidence here need looking at.

 

can you scan up everything you have in/out to them  or anyone elseto one multipage pdf please

put it in time order

you only need to remove YOUR details, reg number, their ref number etc, you dont need to remove their details.

 

read our upload guide carefully please.

 

we also need a full timeline of events/comms with dates

bullet points will do.

 

dx

[dx100uk]

i wouldnt worry about that

 

can you get all the comms up so we can gauge were you stand please.

 

dx

[dx100uk]

We don't know the full story.

 

Dx

[dx100uk]

nothing to stop you sorning the car no.

but i would not scrap it not yours to do that with if its never coming back...

[dx100uk]

you would be liable if it were

however instead of keeping us in the dark here and in that other thread tell us fully whats going on.

 

you also seem to be allowing the NME to dictate what you can and cant do with your own car.

tell them its now sorn'd and must not be placed or used on a public highway. else you will hold them liable in court too.

 

[dx100uk]

have you to exchange witness statements?

or are you using the new online mcol system?

 

dx

[dx100uk]

21 hours ago, DiscoCow said:

I have actually just had a note through the door about 10 minutes ago saying the preliminary hearing has been set for 23rd Feb.  The letter is dated 22nd Nov 22 for some reason but ive got it now

scan this up please to PDF

read upload carefully

[dx100uk]

12 hours ago, DiscoCow said:

The lawyer for lawgistics stated in their MCOL rejection that they wanted to go to court to be given the opportunity to 'cross examine' me.  Not sure what he will try to pin on me. 

mcol rejection?

 

12 hours ago, DiscoCow said:

they wanted to go to court to be given the opportunity to 'cross examine' me.

 

does not happen like that... trying to frighten you.

 

dx

 

[dx100uk]

You know the fee date, but what date have you to exchange witness statements by, as that is your next task.

 

Dx

[dx100uk]

you compile a witness statements with numbered exhibits (documents you intend to rely upon.

 

type in witness statement in our search.

 

for want of ref the sub forum you are in has 100's of them follow the same layout.

paginated, paragraphed etc.

dx

[dx100uk]

courts are closed at the w/end.

 

and mondays are always busy for northants bulk court

 

 

[dx100uk]

44 minutes ago, DiscoCow said:

Also it states on Citizens Advice "If you lose you might have to pay some of the defendant’s costs - like travel and lost wages"

typically the very worst would be about £100 mark, they as you can, can claim time off work, thats £90 at MAX. and small costs like postage etc

 

46 minutes ago, DiscoCow said:

Should i expect the judge to have read my witness statement and attachments in depth?

god yes i would be shocked if not!!

speak when/if spoke too or if you disagree with something the opposition say but be polite!!

[dx100uk]

urm..judge lottery IMHO.

or they play golf with their friends.

 

[dx100uk]

remind them of the judges ruling...no costs allowed?

 

dx

 

[dx100uk]

as you 'lost' its a sep fee .

though i'd be pretty firm on them needing to prove you agreed to such storage fees....