Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help - Aggressive response from Northern Rock


paulif
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6086 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 252
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

OK so they are applying to have it set aside

what does this mean exactly?

what do i need to do? if anything?

 

i have been asked for my consent to have the hearing over the phone?

what should i do in this regard

 

You don't need to do anything unless the court instructs you too.

 

Re the hearing over the phone, consent because it wont stop it happening just make you look a bit vindictive.

 

Personally if i could i wold go to the hearing sit in front of the judge to answer questions and if possible explain why the defendant shouldn't get the set aside.

 

They probably will but i would try present my case and any arguments against their claim.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

i still have not heard from the court

but i have received a whole lot of stuff from the bank

 

they have sent me the application for the set aside twice

(I post an extract from it below)

 

they have also sent me a number of aggressive letters saying unless i consent to the hearing by telephone they will hold me liable for their legal costs etc...

 

i am not happy about a conference call hearing for 2 reasons

 

the first is that i work as a contractor in an open plan office and it will be difficult for me to get some privacy and i dont want to bring all my paper work notes etc into work

if i have to take a day off work for this i would rather go to court in person

 

the second is that they say they "have a real prospect of successfully defending the claim". they have also included their defense in detail...

since i have a judgment and i think there defense is unfounded i don't think this is reason to have the judgment set aside

since they begin legal arguments in full

i feel like i should be arguing my position

 

When i started this process i was under the impression i could not be liable for the other side's legal expenses.

i am concerned they are now threatening me in this way.

 

 

i would appreciate all help, comment etc on the above and the extracts below

 

many many thanks

 

nor1nb4.jpg

 

nor2lx3.jpg

 

 

nor3xd2.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Paul, I advise you to send a person message to one the the moderators of this site and ask them take a look at this thread and ask their advice.

 

NR have no chance of success, they all say that. Its all BLX.

 

I cant give you any more advice, but a moderator will.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paul

 

Sounds like complete hogwash and typical aggressive stalling.

 

They appear to be floundering but you need to ensure that you have complied exactly with process. I am assuming that you did supply a detailed list of all the charges with your N1 and that you followed the template bundle for the Court and defendant showing all the cases as part of the evidence. If so, they cannot argue that your claim was not particularised - otherwise ensure you have all that ready!!

The argument of - we never received a copy of the claim should not hold water - the court knows it sent the claim to them!!

Their final argument re T&C will be destroyed by the cases in your bundle.

 

They can produce all sorts of legal documents and threats - are they real? - disregard them. Only the Court can instruct you to do anything.

The document looks nice and pretty but it did not come from the Court.

 

I would respond to them stating exactly that - 'If you wish to request a Set Aside then I will wait for the Court to notify me and at that time I will write to the court giving good reason why the Set Aside should not succeed and why you have no reasonable defence to my claim. In the meantime I am prepared to delay further procedings for 7 days to allow you to lodge the Set Aside'.

 

Call their bluff - send the letter recorded, copy the Court. Once 7 days have passed procede to request the Court to send in the bailiffs.

 

Do NOT allow them to bully you with any phone conversation, if they do call then be polite and notify them that all communication will only be conducted in writing or in Court.

 

Good Luck

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paul- their 14 days to apply to the Court for a set aside is up tomorrow!

 

If they havent, they are stuffed and you have their danglies in a vice.

 

As of tomorrow, send the above letter so you can show youve been as reasonable as possible.

 

Then in 7 days start to tighten that vice....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Noomill060

 

I have a court date for my set asside with the northern rock. 12 Feb.

The court have not askde for any supporting documentation, do I send any in advance, not much time?

Or do I take it on the chin and take it with me and just defend my case.

 

Will the banks still pay up even with the judgment set aside

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paulif

 

Just checked the letter details that you have copied, what a surprise this is the exact same wording as in my case.

 

sounds like they purposely ignore the court letter, then play the game to have it set aside???

 

I wonder if they will ignore the next date.

 

I will e mail rebbeca evans tonight to remind them i have received my new date na dhow they wish to proceed??

Copy of some articles from the BBC website on banks from yesterday as a reminder that the judges are getting sick that the banks do not turn up??

 

Wish me good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys

 

Its an interesting strategy on their part especially since they both offer the same opening lost case defence. Perhaps it would be a good idea to pm each other your case numbers and courts and include it in a pre-trial motion to deny the Set Aside before the Court case, I'm sure the Judge would not be too happy that this big organization is wasting court time and using improper tactics.

 

In addition, research here, there are at least two judges who have struck out there simple T&C defence as being inadequate.

 

In other words, prepare your arguments in advance and send the Court a request to strike out their request for a Set Aside.

 

Looks pretty strong to me.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zobo

 

Quote

'In addition, research here, there are at least two judges who have struck out there simple T&C defence as being inadequate.

Are they both against the Northern Rock

 

i will research the 'strike out' bit tonight because i think they are taking the buscuit somewhat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I think it was Barclays, but the important issue is one of precedent: these judges know that they have paid out in previous cases and more importantly their T&C argument is a weak defence against the mound of case law in your bundle - so why waste the Court's time?

 

I the request for a Set Aside is normally accepted by a Court unless there is sufficient argument presented by the other party - that is why you need to argue the case ahead of the appearance.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys

 

Its an interesting strategy on their part especially since they both offer the same opening lost case defence. Perhaps it would be a good idea to pm each other your case numbers and courts and include it in a pre-trial motion to deny the Set Aside before the Court case, I'm sure the Judge would not be too happy that this big organization is wasting court time and using improper tactics.

 

In addition, research here, there are at least two judges who have struck out there simple T&C defence as being inadequate.

 

In other words, prepare your arguments in advance and send the Court a request to strike out their request for a Set Aside.

 

Looks pretty strong to me.

 

you guys are a huge help

 

i still havent heard from the court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zubo

 

in my ignorance what the best way forward??

 

Do I send in my court bundle before the hearing as the court have not asked for this??

 

Do I push the issue??

 

BJ - Let me understand this first.

Paul has had a judgement in his favour with NR in absentia as I read it claiming they did not know and would have successfully defended it.

 

Did you have the same - did you go to court and get a judgement in favour and they are now seeking a Set Aside for your case too, and you now have that set aside info from the Court with the date?

 

Let me know.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paulif / zubo

 

I read on many pages that if the bank defends then the court will issue to me an allocation questionaire??, this needs to be returned within 28days of the court case, well i am well timed out as i recieved my notice from the court last friday and the hearing date in two weeks time.

 

Will send the court bundle to both and play by ear

Link to post
Share on other sites

how does one pm a mod?

i really would like to know what i am to do

i have not heard from the court

the bank says the set aside hearing is in nottingham

and if dont agree to telephone hearing then they will sue me for costs

 

a mod would be hugely appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paulif

 

Sorry cannot realy help there,I guess if you can find a moderators name the double click and the details are available to PM.

 

you mentioned that the court case is nottingham? is this local to you

If not ring the court and ask what are the implication of it being moved closer to you.

 

As for the telephone sueing lark, i ignored them in the first instance and they have not been back on, so i do not understand there stance on this.

 

when are you due in court to here the application to set aside the judgment??

 

Are you aware of any other Northern rock people out there with the same issues, or are we the only two, as I may try and get the defence struck out but not sure what I am doing there??

 

As for the next steps not sure by all account the bank have the judgment set aside in most cases but not sure what happens next or is that it end of story???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...