Jump to content


UKPC ANPR PCN - Campbells Meadow Retail Park Kings Lynn PE30 4YN


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Don't worry or start having doubts joe. There is a lot in the lengthy Beavis judgment which will rip the fleecer's own case to shreds.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

The PCN states that you parked when parking was not allowed. Is there another sign in the car park stating unauthorised times?

 

i wouldn't worry too much if you did since the sign at the entrance does not say that. It just directs you to the T&Cs within the car park which means that the sign is an offer to treat.

 

Edited by lookinforinfo
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

Had an unpaid debt reminder notice from a CST Law today.

 

Apart from the usual 'Beavis V Parking Eye means you must pay us' nonsense they are telling me they can commence court action anytime within six years (hoping the law changes in their favour), they will ask for an increase of statutory costs and court fees (as it's small claims that is nonsense so I believe). And to finish off they ask me to keep Debt Recovery Plus up to date with my address so court papers can be sent as it's vital it's correct for the CCJ.

 

I know this is a load of rubbish but should I keep it on the outside chance they do try and take it to court so the judge can see what levels they go to scare people into paying?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should never destroy anything

scan them all

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Had this one turn up today. Pretty sure it's just another threat rather than real intent but would like a second opinion.  They keep stating they can ask for interest. I thought if it was under £3000 it was small claims and that wasn't allowed or has it changed?

 

DCB(L) letter of claim.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a Letter of Claim so you can't ignore it. Now is the time for you to be proactive.

 

Do a search on CAG for 'snotty letter' parking company to see what other people have written.

 

And check our Parking Company Successes subforum for threads that mention 'claim' because most of the them will have had a LoC arrive and the OP should have sent a snottty letter.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to UKPC ANPR PCN - Campbells Meadow Retail Park Kings Lynn PE30 4YN

yep snotty letter time plenty here already.

 

you keep deleting all dates etc.

you only need to redact your details, any qr or bar codes or little texts in the margins and any ref/pcn numbers.

 

dates of letters are important.

 

you have 30 days.

 

pop up your idea here.

run the 30 days till its almost gone.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

use our enhanced google searchbox

snotty letter

 

^^clickme

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found this one which seems to the point, does it fit in with the letter they sent though?

 

You state that I should consider this to be a letter before action or letter before claim.

Unfortunately for you I cannot accept this shoddily thrown together piece of tripe to be a LBA as it fails miserably to come anywhere near a lba as required under the revised Civil Procedure Regulations and so would expect a court to summarily dismiss any claim later made by you or your client on that basis.

 

However as you are the parking world third worst firm of solicitors I am not surprised you failed to put any effort into this taradiddle

 

so to make sure that there is no misunderstanding

I deny that any monies are owed to your client by myself as there is precedent case law that your clients greed has blindeed them to.

 

The same applies to the inflated amount of the claim, the POFA and contract law are very clear on this point and again plenty of examples of dismissed claims are in the public domain.

 

Your fondness for misquoting the decision of PE v Beavis makes it look like you have never read the full judgement but like the other rent a threats see it as a panacea for justifying any old coddswallop you care to trot out

 

It would be wise if you took your obligations you signed up to when being entered onto the SRA roll and advised your clients it is not in their interests to continue with this matter as they have no cause for action and I shall seek a full costs recover order for any civil claim made under the unreasonableness criteria.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

plenty of time for the experts to assist

 

what date was that paploc?

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so till about 13th to respond let the 30 days run down, dont reply early.

 

you need to be reading up tooo...

vanishing for 2mts is not a good thing...2mts reading up would have been better...

we are predominantly self help...

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

the very same forum your thread is in 

 

Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group

 

read about 10-20+ threads that take your fancy...

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to tweak the snotty letter though according to your circumstances, otherwise they will know you are just copying & pasting and don't understand the legal arguments.

 

They didn't use the terms Letter Before Action, Letter Before Claim or LBA but instead a similar term, so you need to change that.

 

Also, why did you say they quoted the Beavis judgement when that is nowhere in their letter?

 

Please post up a revised draft.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 18/05/2023 at 13:38, joe1965 said:

You state that I should consider this to be a letter before action or letter before claim.

 

their title is letter of claim

 

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and is was a DR+ DCA letter that mentioned beavis....

not to PPC nor DCB legal.

 

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...