Jump to content


Car scrapped + DVLA Fine > Conviction


scarred
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3633 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am at a loss for words. The main facts:

 

 

 

 

  • My car was due for renewal in 1 week and I had to be away for work.
  • I parked my car in a residential area that I thought was off the road, whilst away for 3 weeks.
  • When I returned, the car had gone. I reported it stolen and was told that the car was impounded.
  • As the tax disc was out of date, the council had the car scrapped.
  • The car was my only mode of transport and had a lot of items with sentimental value in it.

Almost four years later (I had moved house during this time)

 

 

 

 

  • I received a letter from bailiffs saying that I owed £400+ magistrates fine.
  • Apparently I had been convicted in my absence for keeping an unlicensed vehicle.
  • The DVLA would like me to pay £50 extra as a fine to waive the £400+ magistrates fine. They seem to be ignoring the fact that my vehicle and its content were destroyed and discarded.

Can they do this? Do I now have a criminal record?

 

Please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi and welcome

 

you certainly don't have a criminal record.

 

so the area was part of the public highway then?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply.

 

I didn't think it was part of the public highway at the time (silly I know) - which is why I chose that place. It was a courtyard "off the road" outside some council flats.

 

Like this: (http) c2.staticflickr.com/8/7226/7182151170)00c9ed1971 .jpg

 

With tarmac instead of grass. Several cars were parked there and mine was one of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may depend on what offence the DVLA have alleged.

 

It could be:

Using or keeping an unlicensed vehicle on a public road (a road maintained at public expense), contrary to s.29, Vehicles Excise & Registration Act 1994 .

Or

Being the registered keeper of an unlicensed vehicle, contrary to s.31A of the same act - for that offence it doesn't matter where the vehicle is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, RayKay. I don't know yet - which is the problem with convicting someone in their absence. If the car had been off the road, would s.31A have applied? I think it was likely to be s.29, simply because they scrapped the car. It may well have been both. The car was insured at the time, if that makes any difference.

 

I don't understand how they can convict *and* fine someone whose car they have destroyed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are doing you for having a vehicle without a tax disc and no SORN. Your get out is having the council's scrappage cert, if it is available and then go back to court to get the judgement overturned. You can appeal on the basis of the failure to notify but I'm not sure how that sits with the timings of your change of address. You will need to ask the court that made the original judgement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A certificate of destruction would not help if the offence involved an unlicensed vehicle , it could help if the offence was for failing to notify disposal of the vehicle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, RayKay. I don't know yet - which is the problem with convicting someone in their absence. If the car had been off the road, would s.31A have applied? I think it was likely to be s.29, simply because they scrapped the car. It may well have been both. The car was insured at the time, if that makes any difference.

 

I don't understand how they can convict *and* fine someone whose car they have destroyed.

 

Two different matters, the council removing and scrapping the car, and the DVLA prosecution for not having a licence.

 

S.31A applies wherever the vehicle is, s29 only applies if the vehicle is used or kept on a public road.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...