Jump to content


rogue ebay car trader/trading standards/cab/now court/keeps setting aside my claims


david1471
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3748 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

going by office of fair trading he broke various laws in the description and claim of the full recon engine and warranty were trading standards main points of evidence.

 

trading standards also pointed out he his well known for folding business once he gets court out and he his someone there aware of

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Within six months the burden of proof is on him to prove that the car was fit for purpose at the point it was sold. Don't get me wrong, he will have difficulty proving this, but it can go either way, in my experience judges generally are hostile to FPP claims about second hand cars.

 

The other problem is that the fact that the car should have had a recon engine/turbo will not be assumed unless you can produce a copy of the advert, and problems with the oil etc. might not be enough by themselves to constitute not FFP. Its all certainly worth pursuing but not necessarily a slam dunk if he defends.

 

If you have a print-out of an advert which makes claims which you can prove to be false (based on some sort of expert report?) that would be stronger.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

little update 28th of January I went through mediation with the trader, we entered a settlement on a few grounds

 

 

1. I took much less to end this saga

2. he made quick payment due to court papers and fees needing to put in by 11th feb and cleared funds would be needed.

3. I cancelled court action and returned car documents.

 

 

he sent cheque very late meaning I would miss dates for court action

 

on entering cheque into bank

got them to check it out before depositing,

 

they spotted he put a line through 1 word knowing this would avoid the cheque from clearing but

they could try and see what happens.

 

Today the cheque bounced but

 

after speaking to mediator prior I was lucky I kept to my court dates

 

so his still gotta go to court in 2 weeks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh how surprising!!!

 

well done on keeping the option open.

 

make sure that goes into any doc you produce.

 

very obv deliberate.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you keep a copy of the cheque? This would be strong evidence that he settled the case and agreed to pay the amount, which would be binding regardless of the underlying merits of the case.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...