Jump to content


Facing disciplinary action for being innocent


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5164 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Outofsync.

 

I have not seen a more flimsy case than this one on here. Don't be overawed, take notes or record it, they have not got a leg to stand on from the evidence you have given here.

 

You are in the right, write exactly the questions you are going to ask and read them out. It really helps, it can be a daunting enviroment. Don't let the meeting end until you have asked them, ideally get them out straight away.

 

Good luck, your son is lucky to have you as his PARENT.

Edited by Whodini666
Link to post
Share on other sites

OOS, if you take notes during the meeting, it will give you time to think while you're writing and help slow down the meeting if you want to. Also the notes could be useful later.

 

Good luck, I'll be thinking of you at 5pm. Please come back later and tell us what happened.

 

HB x

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG, just found out that when they did the last search, they checked his pockets, the waistband of his jeans and underwear, and told him to take his shoes off so that they could check them, then they checked the soles of his feet, and after all of this, they still found nothing!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What are you disciplining my son for?

Have you searched my son?

How many times?

Did you at any time find any money on him?

Who else was searched?

Who witnessed those searches, if any took place?

Do you have CCTV footage evidence?

Can I see the CCTV evidence?

Are you also disciplining my son for use of his mobile phone in work hours?

Exactly when was he using his mobile phone, dates, times?

Have you checked other members of staff's phone records to see if they have also been using their mobile phones in work time?

Are you aware of my Son's disability?

What evidence do you have that my son was not using the WC other than it's purpose?

 

Generally building up the evidence trail and making it obvious that he is being discriminated against. You can then document the answers.

 

Others on here will have other contributions.

 

Regards W

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have time, document what they have done and ask them to read, verify and sign the sheet outlining it.

 

You need more time really to do this properly.

 

I was in exactly the same position, asked for more time and got it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask if the The person who carried outthe search has had the proper stop and search training

 

Ask why if they thought there was a clear case of theft which they obviously did having only singled out 1 person for search why they didnt involve the police immediately.

 

If you can record the whole thing most mobile phones have large enough internal memories and have the ability to take voice notes use it as a dictophone if you dont have one to take. That alone scares the poo out of some employers and makes them VERY careful what they say

 

Also Why three times of search once understandable if they are searching everyone. Twice if he has been left alone since the original search with access to unsearched belongings 3 times is just invasive.

Edited by Jimbo-Jones
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here now, just been informed that I'm now not allowed to sit in, so I've asked for copies of witness statements and the handbook and a copy of his contract. The girl who was supposed to be doing the hearing has showed us a statement my son actually gave except he hadn't signed anything. Go figure

Link to post
Share on other sites

well heres a statement i just printed off my computer stating exactly what i want it to say to proove you sons guilty....But he hasnt signed it.....Im still going to show it to you just to worry you though ;)

 

As far as i am aware its worthless and to hold any weight if it is his statement he will have to have signed it. someone will be along in a second to confirm/slap me for being silly in a sec :)

 

What does your son say about the statement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, some money was discovered to be missing.

They searched your son (3 times) and found nothing.

They didn't search anyone else.

 

I would suggest that, because of their own actions, the only person that they can be certain is innocent is your son.

Link to post
Share on other sites

mariefab twice this money has gone missing now first time op's son was not in and then again now this all smells very fishy to me there has been serious allegations been made here i wander how the police would take it if ops mum were to call?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I fully agree with 'mariefab'...

 

...but I am concerned about their policy... t says that his property can be searched at any time and without notice if the circumstances are considered necessary.

 

Is that all it mentions?

 

a) There is no legal right to 'stop and search'... they must have the express consent of the employee they want to search...

 

b) A strict and detailed policy about 'stop and search' must be implemented...

 

c) A record of 'stop and search' must be documented everytime an employee is searched...

 

d) A proper procedure should always be followed...

 

e) Never target an employee on a regular basis... this could well amount to harrassment or discrimination...

 

f) Ensure that members of staff conducting 'stop and search' are properly trained...

 

g) Whilst the Human Right Act may not directly affect your son's workplace, an employee could allege that the manner of a 'stop and search' policy is too invasive and infringed article 8 (Right to Privacy). It still can be a relevant factor for an ET to look at...

 

h) (silly me... I forgot this one)... Two persons must be present... One to conduct the search and one to observe that policy is properly followed...

Edited by Bigredbus
Addendum

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

...and when it comes to the 'vanishing' money... and the fact that they did not find anything after succintly searching three times... it could be construed as ill-founded allegation of theft...

 

Not nice for the employer! ;)

Edited by Bigredbus

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We're back. My son didn't give a statement, he was asked by his boss for his version of events but nothing was written down at the time. We arrived there to be told that they had all statements including one off my son and when we pointed out the signature wasn't his, she looked a bit sheepish. We now have until at least the middle of next week as we are waiting on the copies. Also, at least two more members of staff were calked into the office, but whether they were searched or not is anyones guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that it smacks of a poorly executed attempted set-up.

 

Someone finds that the money is missing.

They get a witness and walk your son to where the money should have been and 'discover' that it's missing.

They use the fact that he needs to use the nearby loo frequently to cast suspicion on him.

 

Then they stupidly cock-up the set-up by repeatedly and thoroughly searching him; thus proving his innocence.

 

Why they have progressed to a disciplinary is a puzzler.

 

If the police were called, after hearing about how he'd been searched, I would imagine that they'd be looking at everyone but him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They dared copying his signature on that statement?

 

[Are they suicidal?]

 

You definitely want one of those... please! :eek:

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...