Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

rdm2006 v HSBC - ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6518 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My bank (HSBC:evil: ) decided (by accident or otherwise) that my wife was not my mortgage protection policy and therefore she was unable to make a sickness claim. 12 months later we listed a number of complaints against the bank, one of which was not advising me to change my policy over when i had informed them that i had taken voluntary redundancy. The bank replied to this by saying that my wife was on the policy at that time and that i should make a retrospective claim which i did. we later found that when we had taken out an equity release loan in 2002 the bank (in their infinate wisdom) had actually reduced the amount i could claim from £250 pm to £200 pm instead of adding £200 pm making a total of £450 pm. Also, as we had not been paid this money we had been charged £1200 during this period in overdraft charges. This amount has now been refunded and the mortgage protection benefit of £5400 has been paid (partly by their underwriters & partly by the bank due to its error), However, as my account was £2000 overdrawn during this period (partly due to unlawful charges) we had no alternative but to remortgage our property in 2004 (which they also made an error on in my opinion, as they did not leave us with the lowest payments possible as requested). The question is how do i stand legally as i was forced to remortgage when this was not necassary ?

 

 

If any one out there can help this would be greatly appreciated.

 

PS i wrote to hsbc (does this stand for hongkong and shanghi banking cowboys?) asking for details for as long as they hold records for (minimum 6 years legally I beleive) today

 

30/06/06 cheeky beggars, I rang today to obtain my balance and was auto diverted to an advisor, i asked why i had been diverted and was told that as i was a Valued Customer (yea right, do they really exist) they wanted to ask if i would like to change to the bank account plus I told them to PO in so many words and i wasnt talking ferries....

Link to post
Share on other sites

also i would like to know as i have a mortgage with them, can i put in my letters, whilst reclaiming charges, that if they close my account that i will assume that they no longer require my mortgage to be repaid as this has been cleared by way of compensation. That should p them off very nicely too, dont you think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

letter from bank saying charges are correct and they provide a service by choosing whether or not to pay d/d,s if a/c over limit:-x .

 

I have sent a letter to them advising that i will continue regardless and that had they not made these unlawful charges and the other mistake (combined total £12,108.23:eek: ) i would not have had to remortgage. I will let you know what happens.;)

 

PS how much is the court fee ?:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

just picked up an email from ian sheperd as i has asked him to forward an email to colin langdale for me and he says mr langdale has now retired so we will have to cross him off the contact list:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition to claiming back your charges, don't forget to claim for the interest charged on any of the cherges if they were transferred to a loan account.

I also see no reason why you can't claim for repayment of interest on that part of the mortgage that represents the unlawful charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Kurjam

If you go to HMCourts-Service and type in form no ex160a.This is an online leaflet and it is all in there. The actual form to complete is ex160 (no a at the end)

 

well everybody I rang the court to see if they had heard from HSBC as I had not

and the b*gg*rs have acknowledged my claim which gives them another 14 days which runs out on the 21st Aug instead of the 7th :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

And as if by magic - what should drop on my doormat this morning a letter offering the full amount with the usual condition to keep quiet about it. Strange thing is it is my wedding anniversary today so its a bit like getting an anniversary presy LOL

 

I have not come accross this one before on the website. Am I ok to say I will accept this as an installment of the full amount + the 8% interest which the court will allow under section 69 county courts act. I have to admit that although I included this clause on the claim form I did not include the amount on the court form as there was no way I would know how much the interest would be at the time the bank would agree payment. was this wrong ?

 

Offer made £3,968.23

  • Confused 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to admit that although I included this clause on the claim form I did not include the amount on the court form as there was no way I would know how much the interest would be at the time the bank would agree payment. was this wrong ?

 

But you would have known how much the 8% interest amounted to at the time of filing from the spreadsheet calculations and the daily rate is the amount of interest that is added each day until the banks settle

 

What exactly did you put in your claim re: s69 interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

accordingly the claimants claim

 

a) return of charges in the sum of 3968.23

b)court costs - There wern't any so Nil

c)Interest persuant to section 69 county courts act as set out on the attached list of charges or at such a rate and for such a period as the court deams just

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...