Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×
Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Homer67

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,234

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Homer67

  1. Homer67
    So you're not prepared to answer then?
  2. Homer67
    I think anyone can apply to the DVLA for these details if they pay their £2 - no such thing as data protection when there's a profit in it for a Government organisation.
  3. Homer67
    I have decided to start a PE thread as there has been so much activity by PE lately other threads are getting taken off topic by issues raised about PE's ability to make claims in court. The first thing I want to question is why have PE suddenly decided to flood the courts with these claims? Has it been proved how many cases are actually registered with the courts and how many have actually gone all the way? (regardless of result) How many of these claims have resulted in a a successful claim for PE? (we can get the details later whether they were undefended etc) Peanuts allergy posted the below information on another thread, my question to Peanuts allergy is this post appears to be presumption on your part, do you have evidence to state this is fact?
  4. Homer67
    Do you still have the parking ticket receipt you purchased on that day?
  5. Homer67
    You parked in a Supermarket car park that is for public access and your passenger used the shop while you were there - what is their loss... nothing or small change for parking, so they can claim nothing from you or just the small change parking charge Either ignore or hover the mouse over the word ignore and send the prove costs or bog off letter, write to Aldi if you like but all they will do is send you a letter saying it's nowt to do with them and refer you to the Parking Eye Desk. Personally as you have started the ignore route I'd continue with that, if you are one of the few who receive stamped court papers then you have an absolute defence - you were parked while shopping and that's without the usual cannot claim costs other than actual losses/only landowner can claim losses etc defence
  6. Homer67
    And as in post 22 they can still not pursue costs that exceed actual loss or prove they are entitled to claim any costs as only the land owner can do that - you have been told this so many times and not once have you responded with any proof showing PPC's can claim costs of any amount other than actual loss in circumstances other than where they are the landowner.
  7. Homer67
    The fairest thing to do is advise the RK to write to the PPC Desk Jockeys once and tell them you were the driver on the day, then you can ignore their begging letters and the RK is not involved at all.
  8. Homer67
    What do you want, written evidence from me? I have PPC invoices from every year going back for about 3 years, not that that makes any difference to the advice I have given which is the same as every other PPC despising poster on here. The law has not changed in the last few years other than the PPC are now able to send their unenforceable invoices to the RK of the vehicle - as 'I was not the driver' was never recommended as a defence it makes not one iota of difference. PPC's still have not addressed the issue of not being able to fine people or the fact that only the landowner is able to seek reimbursement of costs. So the 'good old days' as you put it have never gone away, PPC's are still toothless. As you seem to be so pro PPC I have to ask what is your agenda here?
  9. Homer67
    Several, specifically it was unenforceable invoices from Parking Eye that brought me here in the first place, I have ignored several and I have more recently sent the prove costs and deny liability letter, no court papers ever received and interestingly enough Parking Eye are the mob that give up the quickest. Now show me your credentials and I don't mean your PPC and BPA membership card.
  10. Homer67
    I've asked you one question on another thread and you think that's arguing with everything you've said? Methinks the poster doth protest too much. Rattled your cage have I? Don't take quotes from different threads and try to quote me as giving inconsistent replies - court papers do not come from Debt Collectors, they come from the land owner or PPC if they are produced at all. A Debt Collector can issue whatever they like as an individual but not as a DCA on a debt they cannot enforce, any DCA will bog off the minute you advise the debt is denied as they cannot pursue it further - fact.
  11. Homer67
    Tell your Dad to write to the company once and tell them you were the driver of the car, that way you can ignore their begging letters and your Dad won't be on your back. Them being told you were the driver does not enable them to charge you anything either, you stayed in a free car park so what was their loss? As they are only allowed to claim losses and only then if they are the landowner, any percentage of free of charge is still zero.
  12. Homer67
    Ignore, they are a joke and that letter reads as if written by a stroppy teenager 'well disappointed' indeed, the OED describes the word 'well' as relating to health and a hole in the ground, not an adjective or an adverb
  13. Homer67
    This is wrong, the DCA cannot take you to court for a debt that is denied, it must be referred back to the client for further action by them if they decide to do so. This applies to any debt being chased by DCA's This really is beginning to err on the side of scare mongering by the poster and I hope the Forum Mods are taking note.
  14. Homer67
    I'm curious Peanutsallergy, why are you here exactly? You seem to be very pro PPC and you go to great lengths to rubbish any assurances given to posters receiving first time PPC invoices. I will do an FOI to PE and ask the relevant question but I doubt you will want to hear the answer, how about you start proving some of your given facts and give some figures to back up your claims that PE are doing court almost every time. I do think you are scaring people into paying instead of providing what is factually known - that PPC's can only claim actual loss and only the landowner can claim any loss in court.
  15. Homer67
    Why were you 'expecting court papers' - PE may have been issuing more than usual lately but you make it sound like it's part of their process, it is still a very small percentage of their unenforceable invoices that are being issued with actual court papers.
  16. Homer67
    Debt Recovery Plus are a powerless Debt Collector and should only ever be responded to with 'Debt is denied, refer to back to your client' in writing, unsigned (print your name), never ever speak to a DCA on the telephone. If you do get court papers then come back here for help from the trusted posters. Do not let the recent flurry of threads about PE and court worry you too much, some may be bogus anyway.
  17. Homer67
    Why are you paying an unenforceable invoice - it is not a fine, only Police, Courts and Government can fine you. Do some reading on the forum and you'll get the idea, ignore or send the dispute costs letter, then ignore.
  18. Homer67
    It's not a fine - only Police, Local Government and Courts can fine you, it is an unenforceable invoice, generally you can ignore and laugh at their ever more desperate begging letters or, as some PPC's have been issuing stamped court papers in the hope that you won't defend, you can send the dispute debt, prove costs and bog off letter - hover your mouse above the word ignore for details.
  19. Homer67
    You're best to start your own thread if you want specific answers, generally the action to take is either ignore or appeal (which will be refused) then send the prove costs, prove right to seek costs and deny and bog off letter - hover the mouse over the work ignore for this procedure.
  20. Homer67
    You are a single parent with a young child and could be classed as vulnerable, contact the council, do not take no for an answer and ask for the debt to be taken back by them and agree/offer the best payment plan you can afford.
  21. Homer67
    They don't sell the debt to a Debt Collector, they pass it on to the next desk where a script merchant sits who contacts you and tells you that they will take your house/children/grannie away if you don't cough up. All cobblers and worthy of note that so called Debt Collectors have absolutely no powers at all, never converse with them other than to say 'Any alleged debt is denied, refer back to your client, do not contact me again'
  22. Homer67
    I'm confused, is this a Parking CHARGE Notice or PENALTY charge notice - as it's on Railway land it could be either and the advice differs accordingly, please check and come back?
  23. Homer67
    There is no appeal process (apart from POPLA) so if yu have a strong will you can choose to ignore or, if you are easily intimidated, send the deny any debt, prove costs and bog off letter (hover mouse over the word ignore for details) Remember it is not a fine - only the police, council and courts can fine you, it is an unenforceable invoice. Do some reading on this forum and search BBC Watchdog Private Parking Tickets on Youtube to hear it from Anne Robinson
  24. Homer67
    Forgot to update this but my laptop was returned with a replaced hard drive, no charge and all working ok
  25. Homer67
    Never ever speak to Debt Collectors, they are powerless morons who will lie to you and tell you they are able to take your home, your children and your left leg when they are, in fact, completely powerless to do anything. They cannot visit you, they cannot instruct a Bailiff, they cannot enforce a private parking ticket which is nothing but an unenforceable invoice. Do not talk to them again, if they call you back tell them the debt is disputed and they must refer back to their client. what the 'debt collector' is in this case is the same Private Parking Company acting under another name at the next desk trying to bully you into paying something that you don't have to. Ignore them.

Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...