Sort of Dear DCBL I know and you know that your claim is pants if you are silly enough to try it out in court and risk a thrashing be my guest You know and I know that you are on a sticky wicket post anytthing up you do propose sending to give the team a chance to tweak if needed. but don't give them any clue as to what you would use against them if they did issue a claim Plenty of snotty letters on here Anything you send copy to Parking Eye

The sooner the questionnaire done the better to see what they are saying.

You have submitted the standard skeleton defence so if you read up as suggested then start looking at what is wrong with their claim.

That picture of the alleged Hunt is used on various DCA letters under different names, perhaps its worth sending a letter with proof of posting that the address for service of legal matters is now in Zimbabwe

Yes post it up please, they have done so much that's wrong they would be in for a pasting in court

And with the letter get a free proof of posting from the Post Office they are greedy and stupid enough to ignore you can use it against them later.

WE do need to see what you submitted in case you do need to rebut something they chuck in in challenge.

Superb they bottled out.

That offer letter definitely we need to see.

Stick with the one recommended in the Sticky Less is so much more t this stage, your full WS there would have given them an open goal to concoct all sorts.

Yes the standard 3 line defence before the deadline Less Is More at this stage

Yes as resident in Zim they would be very silly to proceed to a Court Claim, Zim could write another snotty letter that if they did want to take it to court, she would have to fly over from Zim, and if they lost which is highly likely given the lack of signage means to pay, they would be footing the bill for the flight and return. Something along those lines.

Looks OK less is more at this stage so as not to give any hint of whet they will get chucked at them ina Witness Statement later.

We need to see all date information.

Yes never On The papers without a hearing its almost a guaranteed win for fleecers as they can lie with impunity and no challenge possible.

Yes way too early for WS if AOS done its only the sket=kleton 3 line defence needed at moment.

Good2go might have given up if the three attempts were prior to the update, as perhaps their system cancels payment after 3 refusals?

Yes definitely take out the bit about signage and include Nicky Boy's changes. not sure about the pictures.

Well if someone wants to live off grid in a van, or narrowboat or go camping outward bound one of these would be useful. Come to think of it given some of the water today, might be useful anyway. Portable Water Purification | Bottles | Jerrycans | Cube | LifeSaver ICONLIFESAVER.COM LifeSaver water purification products turn dirty water into clean safe drinking water. Perfect for everything from hiking to emergency preparedness.

They are stuffed if they did do court as that 2008 case is no longer relevant due to POFA 2912 in any case there is no legal duty on a Keeper to name a driver for a Parking Charge Notice and the case many fleecers relied on Elliott v Loake Criminal so inapplicable to Contractural cases and CPS v AJH Films, employer/employee so again not applicable have been kicked ouit as proofs many timesw. They really have nowhere to go with this.

Sadly as they are persistent offenders are BW legal.

Might well be non compliant with the trees obscuring it.

Dis you identify yourself as the driver in that appeal?

Appealing is total waste of time also once we see PCN we can assess if any mileage with POFA.

Might well have shot themselves in the foot with that signage, its ambiguous in some respects and confusing requiring payment by phone only at certain periods.