Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Co-op VISA **SETTLED IN FULL**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5384 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I got my statments in yesterday,but 2005 and 2004 information was in the form of a slightly confusing list of details instead of statements

 

However,I have gone through everything and totted up fees of £755,for which I am now putting in a written request to be refunded in full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I contacted Co-0p Bank about charges levied on my VISA account,amounting to £755 on a balance of £3400-odd.I did so in writing and followed the procedure as I have done wih the rest.

 

Today they send me a default notice for a missed payment,and threaten County Court action.

 

Anyone got a good letter to reply with,and should I just go for the jugular and enter a small claim action?

 

help appreciated!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably best in the Co-op thread.

 

What sort of time frames are we talking, everything by the book?

 

I would ring/write them and advise that while an amount is in dispute then no recovery action can be taken. Advise them that the quicker they deal with your request for a refund the quicker the whole missed payments issue will be resolved.

 

Also, explain that the default should be removed if it was applied while the amount was in dispute.

 

See here....http://www.learnmoney.co.uk/credit-cards/remove_default_notice.html

Smile:-The Ethical Bank:- Settled July 2006

HSBC:- Pre-lim sent 09/10/2006

LBA sent:-26/10/2006

Court papers issued:- 13/11/2006

Citifinancial/DLC:- Ongoing since 21st August. Now part of an OFT investigation into Debt Collection Practices.

I am only a Doctor of Love NOT Law. Don't blame me if me advice goes belly up!

:D (I will try to help all the same)

 

If i've helped, use the scales at the top to tell me how great I am!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I don't need to tell you about the process.

 

Good luck mate

BEFORE starting your claim read through the FAQ's and if there's something you aren't sure of then ask.

If you win, donate to this site

Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions, some formed by personal experience and some from research. If in doubt seek qualified legal advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paid mine at lba stage no need for mcol. Only took 28 days to settle from prelim letter to settlement, fingers crossed you'll get your refund soon.

Co-Op

Prelim - 09/06/06 (£2052)

LBA - 26/06/06

Settled 06/07/06 :D

Smile

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) - 03/07/06

Prelim - 23/08/06 (£3185.50)

LBA - 08/09/06

mcol - 30/09/06 - £3250.50 + £800.22 + £120

Settled 13/10/06 :D

Capital One CC

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) - 05/09/06

Prelim - 07/10/06 (1142.90)

LBA - 25/10/06

mcol - 13/11/06 (£735+ £323.29 + £120)

Settled

A & L CC

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) - 07/10/06

Prelim - 14/11/06 (1065.16)

Wescot

CCA - 07/10/06

Co-Op(2)

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) - 09/10/06

BOS CC

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) - 18/10/06

Creation

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) - 18/10/06

Prelim - 02/11/06 (£94.61)

LBA - 17/11/06

Settled 21/11/06

Studio

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) - 18/10/06

Prelim - 01/11/06 (£103.80)

LBA - 17/11/06

Settled 18/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a little worried like you. I hear of these people being refunded at LBA stage and yet I started my moneyclaim ol 2 weeks ago. I suppose though that as more people are claiming it will be taking longer to process claims. One thing though, seeming as I have laid out all the charges in front of them I cany understand how it take 8 weeks to to investigate my 'complaint'.

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

got a letter in this morning-it appears that I miscalculated the level of charges(not surprising as the info sent was quite confusing)

 

The upshot being they have identified £536 in charges and they have credited them to my account balance!!

SUCCESS!!:)

Another one down!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I need some assistance please guys

 

having done a credit check on Call Credit.I see Co-Op have posted consecutive defaults Dec 08 and Jan 09 on an "account" with only an application form with no enforceable terms

 

on top of that,I got no default notice for either default.....

 

so,on the basis that there is no agreement for one,and no DN for two,and the fact that there are 2 defaults at all,where is the letter inviting them to remove the defaults on the grounds that they are data controllers as confirmed by the ICO,and when they refuse,how much should I claim off them in compensation?

 

It's pretty clear that Co-Op took the strunt when they found out they had no agreement,hence the defaults

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have exactly the same problem with them and I am taking them to court. You will find that whatever you write to them they are totally ignorant about consumer law. I am currently in the silly situation where one CRA has removed them but not the other two. Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's Scots Law for me so I need to do it in stages. The removal of the defaults first, then a claim. The Durkin case in 2008 awarded £8000 but I am going for £5000 because it is at the limit of Summary Cause in Scotland. Anything above that is Ordinary Cause, must be led by a solicitor and requires thousands up front so that is a no-no. I'm scheduling everything so that a possible Hearing isn't till after mid-October as I have a holiday booked beforehand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had 6 defaults, 2 fell off, another is about to, and that leaves the Co-op and one other - no agreements, unlawful defaults then termination causing recission on all of them. My case for compensation when I finally get there will be that it is preventing me from getting another mortgage as I am disabled (which I am - I'll be in a wheelchair in court) and I have a flight of stairs up to my flat which I need to get away from (which I do - I wasn't disabled when I bought the flat). I cannot do that with defaults. Equifax waited 6 weeks for a reply from the Co-op and didn't get one so they took the defaults off but they are still on with Experian and Callcredit. I have pointed this out to them and I am waiting for their reply - I take it they are contacting the Co-op. With a bit of luck that will leave 1 to take to court for removal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course, there is a point to both the DPA & CCA.

But, if neither are policed the both statutes are useless.

 

The ICO does not appear to take enforcement action against Banks;

The OFT does not appear to take enforcement action against Banks/DCA's

The FOS are worse than a chocolate teapot and;

The FSA does not regulate; the Banks outwit and run rings around the FSA.

 

I won't even attempt to go into the reasons why TS will not enforce the CPUD/ CPUTR's...

 

All the foreign banks came here to the UK, because of non-regualtion.

 

The whole system is a cesspit and corrupt!

 

AC

 

p.s. there is little or, no protection for the general consumer Re: Banks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...