Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

un1boy - N1 issued for breach of CCA request


un1boy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, Uniboy,

 

I have a case similar to yours, that is going to a court 'hearing' on Friday. Basically, I've made a claim which asks for the coop to stop processing my data to the CRAs, and also to produce a valid CCA. (The other part of my claim involves asking for refund of charges by cheque instead of back to an account which has been closed - don't think this is gonna cut ice with the judge, though.)

 

The judge wants to verify what the claim is about and whether it has been satisfied, (the Coop say it has).

 

Anyway, I'll keep you posted what happens as it may have a bearing on your case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 859
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

That's great Blossom, thanks - and really good luck to you!!

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so the judge has removed his stay and given the bank 28 days (YES - 28 DAYS!!!!) to enter a new defence!!

 

Why????? They haven't defended the claim properly in the first instance when they has their original 28 days. We all know that they will leave it until the 28th day and this has been going on for over a year already.

 

Bloody hell. They can't win this anyway so he's just allowed them to drag it out!

 

Geez.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

that is completely riduculous, I really do hate it when judges act with such incompetence. Yet another example of how 'unreliable' district judges can be and how ill informed as well when it comes to the CCA. I was at a hearing a few weeks ago helping out a friend, mentioned the wilson case as precedent, the judge didn't see the relevance in it! I had to literally argue to get him to see sense!!

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hahahahaha Hahahahaha! Sorry... found the law deserving respect amusing Hahahaha. Ahem ... some laws yes, not all mate. Abide by the law by all means ... but respect?

 

Best Wishes

MoonHawk

I think it would be a good idea.

Mahatma Gandhi when asked what he thought of Western civilization

 

Advice & opinions of MoonHawk are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

Lloyds TSB - Unlawful charges - Settled £8,807.68

Motor Help UK - Misrepesentation Act - Settled £111.25 (Thread Here)

Next Directory court action without a CCA for £605 - Settled & account closed (Thread Here)

CABOT - Can not produce CCA and refusing to accept it - In progress

Aktiv Kapital - Can not produce CCA and also refusing to accept it - In progress

Barclaycard - Can not produce CCA for an account of £2,000. After a long fight used CPR - Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets face it guys - DJ's - you do really have to show them the difference between an a*se and an elbow.

uniboy - I'm about to file also for unenforceability etc so watching with interest - I'm trying to head them off at the pass before they file default.

I'm also due to have a baby in less than 6 weeks so could do with a breather from my bullies.

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand what everyones saying - and congratulations redsue!!

 

I am going to write a polite letter to the Judge asking him to reconsider the defence time to 14 days.

 

The reason is because they have already had the 28 days, and as a multi-million pound company I don't see why they should need another 28 days, especially when the situation has been going on for over a year before it went to court and now it's been in the court for about 3 months already .

 

Also, I will point out that under the CCA the only outcome is that the court has to render it unenforcbale and by giving them 28 days they will enter their defence in the 28th day.

 

I'll also mention that they keep contacting and harassing me.....

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

I

 

Also, I will point out that under the CCA the only outcome is that the court has to render it unenforcbale .

 

since there is no real prospect for the defendant to succeed, why not apply for a summary judgement. I would strongly suggest you look at this avenue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OOh, thanks Humble, I've never heard of one of those though - can you explain what it is and how I apply for one?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it would be a good idea.

Mahatma Gandhi when asked what he thought of Western civilization

 

Advice & opinions of MoonHawk are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

Lloyds TSB - Unlawful charges - Settled £8,807.68

Motor Help UK - Misrepesentation Act - Settled £111.25 (Thread Here)

Next Directory court action without a CCA for £605 - Settled & account closed (Thread Here)

CABOT - Can not produce CCA and refusing to accept it - In progress

Aktiv Kapital - Can not produce CCA and also refusing to accept it - In progress

Barclaycard - Can not produce CCA for an account of £2,000. After a long fight used CPR - Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

since there is no real prospect for the defendant to succeed, why not apply for a summary judgement. I would strongly suggest you look at this avenue.

 

Unfortunatly, i would suggest that this is probably a waste of money, since I've found hearings for summary judgement are often heared weeks after the original trial was scheduled.

 

I also feel that the issues in this case are of potential national importance, and therefore the judge would not be likely to issue summary judgement.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunatly, i would suggest that this is probably a waste of money, since I've found hearings for summary judgement are often heared weeks after the original trial was scheduled.

 

Not true in my experience this is done at a very short notice

 

 

I also feel that the issues in this case are of potential national importance, and therefore the judge would not be likely to issue summary judgement.

 

For what Uniboy is trying to achieve there is already a case law in respect of unenforceable agreements. Therefore there could be no legitimate defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not true in my experience this is done at a very short notice

 

 

 

 

For what Uniboy is trying to achieve there is already a case law in respect of unenforceable agreements. Therefore there could be no legitimate defence.

 

There is no case law in respect of unjust enrichment or restitution, except that wilson explicitly states the creditor must return any security. That is the nationally important bit. it's well established in law that you don't need to pay any further money, but not so well established that you can reclaim any money paid.

 

there was, however, a pawn case that IIRC, might be relevant.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

would nt the undue influence play a part where one was is able to to take an unfar advantage of the other

 

Possibly. That is one of the things this case is about. As I said, potentially of national importance.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a solicitors letter today threatening legal action - i called them and they were vile to me.

 

He said, Let's ignore the credit card account, how does the APR have an effect on the bank account?

 

I know now that they know they cant do anything with the credit card account - i will report them to the Law Society though because they are threatening legal against me for something they do not have the right to do.

 

I will start another thread for the OD account but in summary, they have no paperwork for it and have not sent me the required info under the determination, nor default notices.....

 

I am going to contact the Judge and ask him to reduce the timescale for their defence in light of their recent correpsondence.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, i have told Trading Standards that they have done this because TS are invovled and have written to them twice, with no reply!

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get hold of something to record your calls mate. I find they tend to behave when you tell them they are being recorded. Some answer machines allow you to record calls, but make sure it is one where it has a tape you can take out.

 

If you search on ebay for "telephone recording" you can get adapters for under £10 that allow you to connect a cassette recorder or computer to the line and record the calls.

 

Best Wishes

MoonHawk

I think it would be a good idea.

Mahatma Gandhi when asked what he thought of Western civilization

 

Advice & opinions of MoonHawk are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

Lloyds TSB - Unlawful charges - Settled £8,807.68

Motor Help UK - Misrepesentation Act - Settled £111.25 (Thread Here)

Next Directory court action without a CCA for £605 - Settled & account closed (Thread Here)

CABOT - Can not produce CCA and refusing to accept it - In progress

Aktiv Kapital - Can not produce CCA and also refusing to accept it - In progress

Barclaycard - Can not produce CCA for an account of £2,000. After a long fight used CPR - Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get hold of something to record your calls mate. I find they tend to behave when you tell them they are being recorded. Some answer machines allow you to record calls, but make sure it is one where it has a tape you can take out.

 

If you search on ebay for "telephone recording" you can get adapters for under £10 that allow you to connect a cassette recorder or computer to the line and record the calls.

 

Best Wishes

MoonHawk

 

 

I can record them on my phone mate, but whenever I tell them that I am recording they say they won't talk to me and hang up, lmao!!!

 

I just isused an N1 for the OD though today.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...