Jump to content


ajbajb vs M and S


andrewjb
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6217 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good luck, Andrew.

 

Regards, Rooster.

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great stuff Andrew.

 

Unsure how M&S deal with this. Will be interesting to know.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Their defence has been filed by Kate Eaves of DG Solicitors in Birmingham

 

It reads as follows :

 

1) The Claimants Account is governed by the Defendants personal and/or business banking terms and conditions

2) Pursuant to the Defendants terms and conditions the Defendant is entitled to make a charge for its services as set out in the Defendants Price List, including an overdraft review fee for considering whether to provide and providing and overdraft

3) The Defendant denies that the charges applied to the Claimant's account amount to penalties at Common Law and/or unfair contract terms for the purposes of Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (UTCCRs)

4) The charges applied to the Claimants account are reasonable, and are properly and fully disclosed in the Defendants terms and conditions and published price list. The charges represent the contractually applied price for the services provided and the UTCCRs are not applicable to them; alternatively they are not unfair contrary to the UTCCRs. Further the charges are not default charges and, accordingly cannot amount to a penalty

5) Save as set out above, each and every allegation made by the Claimant is denied. For the reasons set out above, it is denied the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief

 

Given that this is a store card, their defence has left me baffled - any advice gratefuly received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

i have my m+s statements but cant see the usual stand out charges- except 1 letter charge @ £15- the only other charges are the interest. what were your charges called on the statements- thanks in advance

I've beat HSBC, GE Money and Abbey

 

Court pending V Barclays and Time Retail

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...