Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bank Charges BOS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6193 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

FYI - I started two claims against Halifax at the same time, one for my bro and one for my other half.

I used EXACT same letters, only changing the obvious, and the figures.

We filed at court for my OH and got a hearing date of 10/5/07 as we received no response.

We were about to file at court on monday for my Bro, when he got a letter today offering him all his charges back including interest.

 

It just goes to show, it's not personal, i believe they are simply snowed under, the deal with some cases, some slip through the net and some they just dont respond to at all which end with the claimant winning by default.

 

Good Luck never the less, we will all get there one way or another ;-)

 

S

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I guess your right on that one. Just got a letter in post this am and it reads,

 

Dear Mr Cascade,

Further to our letter of 22nd March 2007. I'm sorry that you have not yet had a full response to your concerns.

 

We're still investigating your complaint, and you will receive a response from us as soon as possible, but certainly no later than 17 May 2007.

 

Our complaints leaflet, which we sent you previously, explains how we will handle your complaint.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Rebecca Thornton.

 

Redress Administrator

Core Business Team

Customer Relations.

 

 

Is this another stalling tactic or should I phone them Monday and give them a chance to settle or should I just go ahead and file for summary cause? Any advice is welcome.

Gimee! Gimee! Gimee! ma cash after midnight!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cascade,

 

This seems to be bos proceedure. My son got the exact same letter from bos and so did myself. What I did for my son and myself was to continue with my case at court and filed for summary clauses on both of ours. My claim was last year and what happened is that just before the 8 weeks where up I received a phone call from the bank offering me a settlement. I was claiming for £1,570 plus interest, plus costs. The bank offered me £1,000 and I said no I would just continue with my claim. They then offered me the full amount plus interest, plus costs.

I have done exactly the same for my son as I did for myself. Went and filed a summary clause and only on Thursday last week went to the Sheriff Officer and he is now attempting to serve the papers on the bank.

 

My feelings is that I continue to stick to my timeline not theirs. What would happen if you left your case until the 4 weeks are up and they did not get back to you, you would have lost those 4 weeks off your timeline. After all you are not going to loose out because the banks still pay your costs.

I also think that it lets the bank see you are serious when they receive your court papers.

 

Eileen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks stevo, I thought as much. Went to sheriff court today to pick up forms. Have amended the wording for box 7 on summary cause summons form 1 and 1b as posted by scotia. Would appreciate any advice as to the wording.

 

The claimant, XXXX XXXXX, has held a bank account with the defendant since on or before xx/xx/xx the account number being XXXXXXXX. The defendant deducted from the account various amounts of money in penalty charges during the period 26/03/02 to 05/03/07. These were in respect of 'Returned Items Charge' or 'Charges As Notified' (levied if a cheque or direct debit was returned unpaid as there was no overdraft facility on the account).

The claimant contends that these charges were legally unenforceable and the claimant is demanding the repayment of money with compound interest at the defendant's own rate of unauthorised borrowing of 29.80% on the grounds of reciprocity of contract. At the time of filing this action the defendant has failed to make any offer of settlement.

No admissions are made by the claimant as to the incorporation of any term into the contract between the claimant and the defendant purporting to entitle the defendant to levy these charges. If the defendant is able to establish that the contract did contain such terms, the claimant will contend that these charges are unenforceable at law, being penalty charges designed to penalise the claimant for a breach of contract and generate profit for the defendant rather than being liquidated damages designed to compensate the defendant for the actual loss occurring to the defendant as a result of the breach.

The claimant claims from the defendant a sum equivalent to the amount unlawfully debited to the claimant's account in the period from 26/03/02 to 05/03/07 along with interest as intimated. The sums are detailed in the attached schedule.

The contractual provision that permits the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of the Unfair Contract Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (1999), The Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 and the Common Law.

The Defendant has a branch in Kirkcaldy therefore it is under the juristiction of this court.

 

Thanks for any advice.

Gimee! Gimee! Gimee! ma cash after midnight!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi cascade, Good luck with your claim, I enjoyed reading your thread with BoS I'm at the same stage have received all the same letters etc. and am filing for court on Friday 20/04/07, your last post you say you went to court to pick up forms? I tought these could be printed off the templates? but not sure if need official docs as court letters?

Cheers JD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanx johnie pal but I still need to know if the wording here is legally acceptable spelling mistakes and all, Maybe a Moderator or experienced helper can keep me right. I know it is reasonably new territory, on contractual interest but hope I get my wording right on forms b4 I get to court. I have my arguments ready for court. Just I'm not so good at wording them in written format! Doh!:o

Gimee! Gimee! Gimee! ma cash after midnight!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok! I can understand the aprehension here. Let's word it another way. If you were to word it this way initially, would you change any of the wording?, to suit yourself and if so how?.

Gimee! Gimee! Gimee! ma cash after midnight!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cascade hows it goin as I'm looking for a higher amount than the £1500 allowed on the OC been searchin about for info

Just been on the FOS website

If a consumer brings their complaint about bank charges to the ombudsman service – and the bank won’t resolve the complaint by waiving the charges as a goodwill gesture – our job is to settle the argument using our official powers.

This might involve a formal investigation by the ombudsman into the legal and financial issues involved. That would mean our seeking detailed information from the banks about their legal arguments.

I also read a lot of scottish threads for claims over £1500 and the advice by MODS Robertx and Caro seem to suggest that the fso would be the right route to go for larger claims in Scotland, As I am now past the stage where I have to lodge papers at court I would appriciate any advice from Scottish Mods on the FOS Route.

Also read in the Sunday papers that the FSO have been 100% succesfull in claiming back all the charges, I feel that this may even be a quicker less complicated route to go down for larger claims in Scotland.

Any advice please at this stage would be appreciated.

 

cheers

 

JD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Johniedepp

 

Just thought I'd let you know, that as my claim was for £5890 Plus interest, I did the prelim letter and LBA to lloydsTsb, got offered £750 as a goodwill gesture and full and final offer. I requested that they take it back and I filled in the FOS claim form online and printed it off. I have sent it away and await a reply. The FOS form was relatively simple to complete, its just simply repeating what you have said in your prelim and LBA letters.

I would go down this route first, then if all else fails then we might have to consider court action, maybe by that time scottish small claim limit might be revised.

 

Just thought I'd let you know which route I was taking.

 

I wish you well

Linda

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Guys need some advice, I am currently preparing court papers for a summary cause against HBOS. If anyone has got this far then on the summary cause it ask you to put down the defendants name and address. Would this be the branch manager and local branch or just the name of the bank and their HQ, The Mound etc???:???: :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...