PCM/Gladstones Claimform - scratched 7am not PM on visitors voucher - Tachbrook SW1 V (Peabody Estate Pimlico, London).

[Nicky Boy]

Guys,

It looks like the times above the photos aren't photographic timestamps.

It looks like the time when they were all recovered from the computer system to be printed for the SAR?

 

[Nicky Boy]

Guys,

How specific does the parking location need to be?

Tachbrook - SW1V is extremely vague.

 

SW1V is a large area.

There is a Tachbrook Street, but that itself covers around 15 postcodes...

[Nicky Boy]

Brassnecked,

 

There's a poor copy of a sign on page 4 of the pdf upload in post 7.

 

Looking at Google Street, it's apparently not an entrance sign...

 

Google Maps

WWW.GOOGLE.CO.UK

---

Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.

 

And the "entrance sign" is not facing the driver as they enter.

 

I'v also had a look at Westminster planning portal and there doesn't appear to be any plannimg applications for the signage.

 

It should be fairly recent as the signage was different in November 2020 in Street View.

[Nicky Boy]

If you read post 31 by FTMDave, he's pointed to a generic defence you can submit.

All the detailed information comes later in your witness statement and they must support their claim with the evidence you've asked about... and more.

Don't tip your hand to the fleecers exactly what your full arguments at this point... generic defence only.

[Nicky Boy]

Beaten by dx. Story of my life...

[Nicky Boy]

And, no you'll have ample time to write your witness statement later. You should really read some other threads so you know the process and what happens next. Seriously, read some other threads.

[Nicky Boy]

Just a quick thought guys.  Would it be worth putting up a short sticky with basic sequence / time line for the court / legal process?

Should reduce needing to explain it all the time. 

(Probably be of help to me as well!)

[Nicky Boy]

CPR...

 

 

[Nicky Boy]

Think this may be the management company for the estate?

There is something here about "MET parking" which does not match up with the current fleecers.

 

Maybe worth using the "contact us" section at the bottom of the page to ask for more info?

 

StackPath

WWW.PEABODY.ORG.UK

 

[Nicky Boy]

You should really upload anything you're getting if you don't understand it, to give the guys a chance to advise further.

Also, whatever the say, they WILL have to supply EVERYTHING you ask for as evidence well before any court action.

 

This is standard rubbish to intimidate you (Don't let it). There's a long way to go yet. You would know this if you'd been reading plenty of other threads.

 

Upload please, and get reading!

Edited February 23, 2023 by Nicky Boy
Typo

[Nicky Boy]

Describing paperwork is pretty pointless. The guys need to actually read it all.

Please post up everything you've mentioned above...

[Nicky Boy]

DX,

The fleecers WS quotes 23rd June as the hearing date.

 

But, also says it's at Northampton Combined Court?

 

Odd.

 

[Nicky Boy]

Disgruntled,

 

Can't see anywhere on the thread if you've taken pics of the signage?

 

If not, it would be an idea to get some good quality pics (text readable)...

The entrance sign, which is not actually facing the driver as they enter (highly suspect) and some of the other signs (especially if they differ from each other).

Also, any odd or unexplained road markings.

 

This is how the fleecers form a "contract" with drivers, so they HAVE to get them right.

[Nicky Boy]

Good luck and let us know how you get on.

Edited June 23, 2023 by Nicky Boy

[Nicky Boy]

Bad luck Disgruntled...

Would have been interesting to see what was in your witness statement.

It looks like you didn't actually post one up for the guys to read.

I know you left it a bit late and had trouble getting help to write it.

From your comment, "They accepted my defence but what went against me was the fact that I did not state that earlier to the parking company" i'd suspect your WS was fairly basic and probably didn't contain multiple arguments.

The advice is always to throw the kitchen sink at them... everything you can think of.

Edited June 23, 2023 by Nicky Boy

[Nicky Boy]

So the judge accepted that you had a valid defence, but ruled in the fleecers favour simply because you didn't use their (crooked) appeal process.  

Sounds very odd to me.