JBW visit today Council Tax debacle posts

[neil_tp]

Sorry OB but this is all FMoTL baloney.

 

You are aware that these conditions can be curtailed if the actions are compatible with the law and requirements of a democratic society, There are also we must remember the rights of the creditors, Particularly when rights to enjoyment to goods etc. is considered.

 

The exemptions to HRA only apply if the pertinent laws and guidelines are applied correctly so human rights issues may come into play in cases breach.

However courts give bailiffs a huge leeway,

 

In short if the bailiff is misbehaving you are better using the prescribe statutory remedies rather than pursuing an action under human rights if indeed you even can.[/quote

 

 

Actually the only baloney here Dodgeball is what you continually post in CAG on the debt forums.

[old bill]

And I am not going to disagree with what you say, neil_tp.

[unclebulgaria67]

Not this argument again ! People have different opinions and no argument changes minds, so not sure what the point is.

 

Buttercup is mostly right. People don't have to deal with Enforcement Agents, unless it relates to a criminal fine, where they can force entry. If people want to pay what is affordable directly to those they owe money to, there is nothing stopping them, as payment cannot be refused. For council tax liabilities, those threatened with enforcement can seek help of Magistrates, where councils are trying to get a LO to farm out for enforcement.

[Peterbard]

Sorry OB but this is all FMoTL baloney.

 

You are aware that these conditions can be curtailed if the actions are compatible with the law and requirements of a democratic society, There are also we must remember the rights of the creditors, Particularly when rights to enjoyment to goods etc. is considered.

 

The exemptions to HRA only apply if the pertinent laws and guidelines are applied correctly so human rights issues may come into play in cases breach.

However courts give bailiffs a huge leeway,

 

In short if the bailiff is misbehaving you are better using the prescribe statutory remedies rather than pursuing an action under human rights if indeed you even can.[/quote

 

 

Actually the only baloney here Dodgeball is what you continually post in CAG on the debt forums.[/QUOte]

 

Hi MARK

 

Charming as usual, anything intelligent to say, go on break a habit of a lifetime.

[Peterbard]

And I am not going to disagree with what you say, neil_tp.

 

Do me a favour that is no endorsement of either of you.

[Peterbard]

Sorry OB but this is all FMoTL baloney.

 

You are aware that these conditions can be curtailed if the actions are compatible with the law and requirements of a democratic society, There are also we must remember the rights of the creditors, Particularly when rights to enjoyment to goods etc. is considered.

 

The exemptions to HRA only apply if the pertinent laws and guidelines are applied correctly so human rights issues may come into play in cases breach.

However courts give bailiffs a huge leeway,

 

In short if the bailiff is misbehaving you are better using the prescribe statutory remedies rather than pursuing an action under human rights if indeed you even can.[/quote

 

 

Actually the only baloney here Dodgeball is what you continually post in CAG on the debt forums.

 

Hi Mark

 

Just been looking t you posting history on here, you seem to just make one or maybe two posts of abuse towards me or intelligent posters on here then vanish. Is this that inferiority complex playing up again, I think it is.

[Peterbard]

The subject matter was regarding council tax, do keep up at the back!

 

Council tax is a civil debt brain box.

[neil_tp]

 

Hi Mark

 

Just been looking t you posting history on here, you seem to just make one or maybe two posts of abuse towards me or intelligent posters on here then vanish. Is this that inferiority complex playing up again, I think it is.

 

 

Some points for you,

 

1 Been on CAG since 2007, way before you I might add.

2 I don't spend nearly 24 hrs a day on CAG

3 From your posts it just costs posters more money!

4 Nearly everything you post in the debt forums is wrong

[neil_tp]

Council tax is a civil debt brain box.

 

Quote the whole post and not what just suits you!

[Peterbard]

 

 

Some points for you,

 

1 Been on CAG since 2007, way before you I might add.

2 I don't spend nearly 24 hrs a day on CAG

3 From your posts it just costs posters more money!

4 Nearly everything you post in the debt forums is wrong

 

I dont know a lot of intelligent and knowledgeable people think my points are correct anyway:

 

perhaps if you were to give incidents of my posts which is wrong ? and your alternative theory of course.

[Peterbard]

 

I dont know a lot of intelligent and knowledgeable people think my points are correct anyway:

 

perhaps if you were to give incidents of my posts which is wrong ? and your alternative theory of course.

 

Actually i was posting on here in 2006

[Peterbard]

You just wait til the EA returns the Debt to the LA, then nothing is owed to the EA company. Of course alot of authority's do not pass any money on either anyway. That's the great thing about FOI requests.

 

Must dash going outside in the nice weather!

 

Yes and thereby you illustrate the extent and accuracy of you knowledge, enjoy the sun.

[Peterbard]

Its Pote then apologies to mark, i thought even you were not that hopelessly misinformed.

[Leakie]

Can we stop this personal bickering between you two,

it is getting boring.

 

You both have different points of view, just accept it and move on.

 

You both could be correct or both wrong , it is all down to interpretation.

[Peterbard]

Nh its not. Anyway he keeps popping up and insulting people he deserves what he gets, perhaps he should try making some sensible points and argue like an adult.

In the mean time if you are bored i suggest you go and entertain yourself elsewhere.

[BUTTERCUP7]

This is a perfect example.....people need to realise that they have a perfect lawful right to make the local authority/council accept their payments for their council tax. This may well be not the full amount - but this does not matter. They can pay what they can, even as little as a £1.00 per week if they are in so much need themselves, and the council have to accept this. The council will purport to have all sorts of powers and authority....take you to court - which yes, is in a court - but it is in a side room with a council person!! Plus they get you to agree to pay alot more than you can afford!! I personally would insist on seeing the magistrate - i did ask this once and they were ALL horrified!! Then they send bailiffs now called enforcement agents - debt collectors to me and you! - they have no powers - UNLESS YOU LET THEM!! LOCK YOUR DOORS AND WINDOWS - DO NOT ANSWER THE DOOR TO THEM - THEY WILL ONLY PUT THEIR FOOT IN THE DOOR AND JAM IT OPEN AND TRY AND WEAR YOU DOWN - DO NOT DO IT!!!!

 

COUNCIL TAX 'BAILIFFS/ENFORCEMENT 'OFFICERS' - WHICH ARE ACTUALLY JUMPED UP DEBT COLLECTORS WITH NO EDUCATION WHATSOEVER!!! THEY HAVE NO POWERS TO PUSH PAST YOU OR FORCE ENTRY - YOU CAN REASONABLY FORCE THEM BACK IF THEY TRY - BUT THEY WONT AS THEY HAVE A LICENCE TO PROTECT....

 

DONT GET ANGRY - GET EVEN

 

I PERSONALLY THINK THEY HAVE HAD THEIR DAY - WE ARE ALL TOO WISE NOW AND THANKS TO WEBSITES AND THAT SHOW - CANT PAY - TAKE IT AWAY - IT SHOWS US ALL HOW TO PLAY THE IDIOTS...

 

 

Do not entertain them!!!

 

Go back to your local council - pay them what you can - they cannot refuse this payment! Set up your own arrangement directly with the council. Feck the bailiff!!!

 

i accept no liability for anything said above.

 

i agree old bill!

 

THE FACTS ARE THAT ALL AND I MEAN ALL LOCAL AUTHORITIES - COUNCILS - HAVE TO - HAVE TO!! DEAL WITH YOU DIRECTLY.

 

THEY CANNOT REFUSE.

 

THEY SIMPLY CANNOT REFUSE!

 

IT IS THIS SIMPLE - THIS IS NOW APRIL 2016 - THEY CANNOT REFUSE YOU!!!!!

 

IGNORE THE SEE YOU NEXT TUESDAYS AT THE DOOR

 

KEEP YOUR DOORS LOCKED

 

DO NOT ANSWER THEM

 

DO NOT EVER SPEAK TO THOSE ****! THEY ARE PUT AT LEAST £400 ON YOUR BILL!!!

 

THEIR MUMS WILL AND ARE TOTALLY ASHAMED OF THEM!! DONT FORGET THAT.

 

THEY CANNOT BREAK IN.

 

IGNORE THEM WHEN THEY KNOCK!!!!

 

YOUR HOME IS STILL YOUR CASTLE!!!

[Peterbard]

but i think very, very freely indeed

 

x

 

Surprise to me that you are capable of thought at all

[neil_tp]

It won't happen. Once the LA have their money the LO has been paid. There won't be any other method because the LO is paid. Just hope capital Con stays on CAG to update.

[neil_tp]

The £235 is disputed anyway.

[Peterbard]

The £235 is disputed anyway.

 

Only by you and the OP, importantly not by the LA or the EA.

[neil_tp]

Your guessing now & assuming. Lets agree to disagree and let CC d ecide, which he has.

[neil_tp]

Only by you and the OP, importantly not by the LA or the EA.

Of course the EA can't be wrong and neither can the LA?

[Peterbard]

Your guessing now & assuming. Lets agree to disagree and let CC d ecide, which he has.

 

Nope dont guess or assume, you guess if you like, it is all in the TCE.

[Peterbard]

Of course the EA can't be wrong and neither can the LA?

 

Childish gibberish

[Peterbard]

What by disagreeing with DB, or stating that capital con shouldn't pay the £235?

 

I can show all the supporting legislation and previous cases , all you seem to do is state your belief. Which is fine , but not when you ae advising others.