Jump to content


Magistrate Court fines.....Compliance fee of £75 and Enforcement fee of £235 are legally due.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2960 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

 

 

After starting this thread the Guru posted to confirm that he does refer cases to another McKenzie Friend (a female by the name of Sarah) but that she is supposedly a 'practising' solicitor working from Lincoln's Inn'. It is possible that he is correct, but there is a strong likelihood that he also uses the services of a lady with the same first name (Sarah) but that she is from an entirely different area of London altogether (Stanmore to be precise). Crucially.....on her own website, she states that she is a 'former' practising' solicitor. She further confirms that she nows works as a McKenzie Friend and that she 'drafts' documentation for court. She trades as a Limited Company.

 

 

In response to messages that I have received since writing the above post asking for a link to 'Sarah's' McKenzie website. I cannot provide it at this present time given that over the weekend....her website was removed.

 

After reading this I had to go back over the thread as I found it too much of a coincidence that the person referred to is actually named along with the Law Firms' name on one of the Social Media Sites.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Off topic posts unapproved.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Seen two more of these today. Debtor gets notice of enforcment and pays the sum due under the warrant straight to the court, bailiff calls and puts a note through the door £310 due. She rings the court and they say her payment passed straight to bailiff.

 

So frustrating not being able to do anything , the poor woman was beside herself, all to save £75.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think many people do not realise that the enforcment may commence before they are aware, and particularly in council tax enforcment.

 

The fee is due when the EA receives the instruction, not when the initial notice is sent.

The debt must be addressed as soon as the notice of application for a liability order on CT or in the case of a magistrates court fine at final steps at the latest.

 

Stages of enforcement for which fees may be recovered – enforcement other than under High Court writs

5.—(1) The relevant stages of enforcement under an enforcement power which is not conferred by a High Court writ are as follows—

(a)the compliance stage, which comprises all activities relating to enforcement from the receipt by the enforcement agent of instructions to use that procedure in relation to a sum to be recovered up to but not including the commencement of the enforcement stage;

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

142 Power of magistrates’ court to re-open cases to rectify mistakes etc.

 

This thread has run to too many pages and has gone 'off topic'. It would be best if I started a new discussion thread regarding applications under Section 142 as this subject is one where there is yet again a lot of misinformation.

 

For example; defendants are unaware that in making an application under section 142, they are required to serve notice on the other party and if they are seeking to have the fine set aside, the same requirement apply as if they they are applying to withdraw a guilty plea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread has run to too many pages and has gone 'off topic'. It would be best if I started a new discussion thread regarding applications under Section 142 as this subject is one where there is yet again a lot of misinformation.

 

For example; defendants are unaware that in making an application under section 142, they are required to serve notice on the other party and if they are seeking to have the fine set aside, the same requirement apply as if they they are applying to withdraw a guilty plea.

 

Yes CPR 24.18

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...