Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFO CAPITAL/services/turnbull CCJ


melmumof3
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3231 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 665
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think we are quite keen to get this one tested... I'm just wondering whether it might be worth the trip for the hearing.

 

Mel I think I remember that you are waiting for a transcript that they requested are you not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we are quite keen to get this one tested... I'm just wondering whether it might be worth the trip for the hearing.

 

Mel I think I remember that you are waiting for a transcript that they requested are you not?

yes vj, and other intra group docs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

how long should they take to send me the doc's???

 

Well you put a Part 18 request in as I recall on the 26th Feb...

 

So they should have done so by now.

 

I think that an N244 might be in order? Particularly as HFO relied upon new evidence at the hearing ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bring it one! Mel, can you let us have copies of any notices you've been sent so we know exactly what's got to happen by when? Ta. Remember to do it by PM only with your advisors... wouldn't want to upset the judge...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you put a Part 18 request in as I recall on the 26th Feb...

 

So they should have done so by now.

 

I think that an N244 might be in order? Particularly as HFO relied upon new evidence at the hearing ;-)

sent cpr request 16th feb, received response to it on 4th march, which says they have requested transcript and will provide this to me, together with an appeal bundle in due course....takes a few weeks i guess for them to obtain.. i feel heels are a dragging

Link to post
Share on other sites

sent cpr request 16th feb, received response to it on 4th march, which says they have requested transcript and will provide this to me, together with an appeal bundle in due course....takes a few weeks i guess for them to obtain.. i feel heels are a dragging

 

They only part disclosed on mine back in 2008, all very late, they blamed the OC, I applied to OC and got them quicker.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

redtulip2003 didn't want to be my friend... nor did taleb. Is it my breath?

 

BA, HFO they should have everything already, apart from the transcript. Doesn't take a month to get a transcript, does it?

 

I bet they'll file as late as possible...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that an N244link3.gif might be in order? Particularly as HFO relied upon new evidence at the hearing

 

i think a costs hearing and if they are relying on de documents we all know of then they gotta have some bottle vex,costs,possible perj because it has happened too many times and witness statements to prove this has been happening...have i missed anything burp that guinness pretty strong stuff Donki have a sip...makes sure nosebags waterproof

he he lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 5 months later...

no, panty54 is not a cross dresser but a genuine cagger trying to fight 2 particularly nasty battles if you took the trouble to read the threads. The one battle has not been updated of late to prevent prying eyes gleaning too much info but suffice to say it is interesting in that the claimants have been allowed by the court to amend their POC with a reconstituted agreement quoting Carey, allowed to issue yet another DN in order to remedy the previous defective DNs (the one included in this POC jacks up the arrears since the termination was issued) plus one or two other interesting features. In essence you couldn't make it up but this one will go to appeal if it has to. Defence has been submitted and WS to be exchanged in the new year with a hearing scheduled for spring 2011

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good on yer Panty - go for it, if you need help/support just ask! No offence meant, an irritating oink called Bart123 has been shadowing our threads and becoming a pain.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...