Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

IVA with Churchwood/Kingsgate Insolvency. Money Gone Missing?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1893 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Still no sign of anything from Kingsgate following my SAR, the 40 days runs out in five days time.

 

I sent a holding letter to Marlin who have just written back asking me to clarify my problems with the debt.....do I just let them stew for now?

 

Do I then chase Kingsgate if they don't answer my SAR or do I go over their heads to an ombudsman or something.

 

Regardless of this, should my wife file for bankruptcy I have a question re our car. At the moment we have a car that barely runs and is worth nothing but with the new baby on the way we are looking at getting a bigger one. Its going to be second hand and likely under £1500 but could they take this as an asset?

 

I don't drive but if we bought the car in my name would it be my asset not hers regasrdlkess of who drives it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 292
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

'they' the DCA can take NOTHING

 

 

they are NOT BAILIFFS.

 

 

only after a debt has been to court

and IF they get a CCJ

and IF you fail to pay the judgement

then poss court bailiffs might get involved

 

 

please don't fall for the scare tactics they write in threat-o-grams.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell them nothing.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

'they' the DCA can take NOTHING

 

 

they are NOT BAILIFFS.

 

 

only after a debt has been to court

and IF they get a CCJ

and IF you fail to pay the judgement

then poss court bailiffs might get involved

 

 

please don't fall for the scare tactics they write in threat-o-grams.

 

 

dx

 

Was actually thinking of the court in respect of assets in the case of bankruptcy. If the car was in my name would it not be my asset not hers?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are thinking WAY to far ahead but to answer your question IF they take it that far and they could in theroy look into the car but as its in your name then it would belong to you.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think its that far ahead tbh.

 

 

The Northern Rock debt is now with Marlin,

 

 

regardless of what they decide to do CCJ etc

 

 

we can't afford to pay towards the debt now let alone after the baby arrives in April.

 

the only real option in regards to this situation is for my wife to file for bankruptcy,

 

 

at least that's the only way I see it going but then I am a glass half empty kinda guy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then if your wife files for bankruptcy they will investigate where the new car money came from and how comeu can afford a car but not a debt

the car is a luxury

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes.

You don't need a car to get about

you don't need sky or subscription based tv.

even the internet can be classed as a luxury.

 

They would look at everything money in and out.

mostly only the wifes stuff but anything that is Jointly owned/named and maybe just your stuff.

 

 

They would definitely have to see all the bills for the house then consider if money is being used wisely.

 

I read online how one family income and outgoings were assessed and the bankrupt official told them

that the only way they could keep the car was as its a disability car.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is a failed letter in the library top left

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no its the ICO that regulate data

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

change it to reporting them to the ICO

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they usually get things moving quickly.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the package arrived today but I'm not sure it helps really. There's plenty of documentation, copies of all the letters etc but as best I can tell there is no list of transactions that show Kingsgate receiving our payments or how they distributed it (or didn't as the case may be) to our creditors.

 

Not sure what I'm looking at to be honest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you scan them up?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

THere is literally two massive stacks of paperwork they have sent me so scan it all would be a mammoth task that I dont think would bear much fruit.

 

That said I did spot the following -

 

A breakdown of receipts and payments between May 2008 and February 2011 which breaks down as follows -

 

Interest on Clients money = £7.05

Monthly contributions = £6209.00

total Gross Reciepts = £6216.05

 

Less Implementation Costs -

 

BIS Registration Fee = £20

Bond = £156

Irrecoverable VAT = £6.30

total net receipts = £6033.75

 

Payments -

 

Dividends = £3714.31

Nominees Disbursements = £0.00

Nominees Fees = £1489.36

Supervisors Disbursements = £0.52

Supervisors Fees = £484.72

Irrecoverable VAT = £344.84

total net payments = £6033.75

 

Thats all the information theyve provided me with in regards to the money paid out.

 

 

There is certainly nothing resembling a breakdown to show how the money was paid out to the various creditors.

 

 

Am I right that the Dividends is the sum paid out to the creditors?

If so then I don't know why they never paid anything to Northern Rock in respect of the debt

that is now being chased by MArlin (Im basing this on the list of payments that Marling sent me

that showed nothing being paid during the duration of the IVA being in place).

 

Speaking of Northern Rock and the debt that all of my queries are relating to KIngsgate have provided me with copies of a letter

that they wrote to Northern Rock (one for the debt in my name and one for the debt in my wifes name)

and on both letters it quotes the debts as being in both of our names which as I pointed out before is incorrect.

 

 

Both of these letters have a line through them and Unapp written on them,

though this is written on the photocopy not on the original if that makes sense.

 

Can I request a breakdown of the payments made by Kingsgate

and if so can this be done without incurring a further fee being charged.

 

Finally they have also included a letter that does not belong to my SAR.

It is for somebody not related to me, my wife or our financial matters in any way.

 

 

It is for a person that I have never heard of who at the time of the letter lived in Milton Keynes (somewhere I have never lived).

 

 

If gives me their name, address, date of birth, reference and account numbers a

s well as the names of the companies involved (MBNA and Max Recovery).

 

 

I'm fairly sure this breaches some sort of data protection, should I just return it to Kingsgate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to demand from Kingy's WHERE are the statements for where my money went please..

 

 

and no you don't have to pay again.

 

 

give them 7days to comply

 

 

or you are off to the ICO/FOS/FCA.

 

 

looks like its been magic'd away.

 

 

I wonder where.....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ill get a letter sent off tomorrow asking for that information. That said the lady who has signed the covering letter from Kingsgate has given me her email address so could I make the request that way and speed up the whole process?

 

What should I do about the information they sent me about somebody elses account?

 

Makes you wonder whether any of my wifes details have been passed to somebody else.

 

Could it be that they paid the creditors once every so often? I know that my money went to them on a monthly basis but does that mean that they paid the creditors every month or did they pool the money and then pay it out every three months for example?

 

Just say that they cannot show that the money went to the creditors, where would I stand then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is typical for the fees to be all taken first

 

 

remember this is an IVA

they should not be 'amassing' a pot.

its not a DMP.

 

 

p'haps theoldrouge would like to comment

 

 

this is beginning to smell badly.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding of the figures I've listed is that the fees have been taken out of the total monies received which leaves £3714.31 to be paid to the creditors right? If that's right then that sum would be shared equally to the creditors or would the higher debts get the most out of what we have paid?

Link to post
Share on other sites

typically it would be pro rata I think

the bigger the debt

 

the greater % of your payment.

 

however, I think there are far greater issues here

 

the DMP [you say it was wescot - they are a DCA they don't do DMP's]

 

any resord of those payment s on your debt

 

and ofcourse the IVA

 

all the details MUST be in the T&C's you have?

 

 

this really smells to me.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...