Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC/Restons CCJ & CO - Selling property. Heeeeeeelp


hitchy1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3749 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I asked for a copy of the court judgement and it said blar!!!!!!blar!!!! acting for HFC BANK and the defendant acting for herself hahahahaha

 

I was not in court so know nothing about the order which I must say dated back to 2006 nearly 3 years old

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

u need to put in N244 application to set aside (costs £75 unless u have exemption see link below), sillygirl has started u off on the grounds front.

CPR 13.2 and 13.3 cover this point:

PART 13 - SETTING ASIDE OR VARYING DEFAULT JUDGMENT - Ministry of Justice

 

if ur getting probs with the SAR u might be better off sending a CPR31.16 it will resolve any issues with their pettiness abt sigs etc and timescales r far less. but persevere with SAR anyway.

 

link for set aside and cost exemption:

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 12 How To Set Aside A Judgment In The County Court

 

link for CPR31.16 request for disclosure:

why you shouldnt use section 77/78 CCA 1974 if you want the signed agreement - The Consumer Forums

 

BTW did u send off to the court for a copy of the original claim form etc? if not and u havent got it, its gd to have in the file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I only have a copy of the charging order. I will contact court to get the documentation.

 

Been away recently and just got back.

It's now way over the 40 days and nothing has yet arrived.

 

What should my next steps be?

i reckon they have a charging order on my property and have no documentation to back it up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Finally HFC responded and have sent me everything they have.

 

Most of it is just payment and telephone converstaion info,

but the real killer is the agreement which i have posted below and removed the personal details.

 

Question now is

 

will i still have any grounds to challenge and what would they be?

 

There is no default notice, and as stated earlier Restons advised they didnt have any documentation.

 

 

hfc.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I received a charging order approximately two years ago via Restons.

 

At the time they acted for HFC on a £20k loan and whilst i defended in court i lost and the order was granted.

 

Subsequently after reading these forums,

 

i realised that Restons did not provide any of the paperwork required and through my ignorance i didnt challenge the correct things.

 

I have SAR both Restons and HFC and have received nothing of worth from Restons,

but have received documentation from HFC which includes a copy of the agreement.

 

Is it possible for me to challenge the original hearing due to restons failure to provide the required legal documentation?

 

if this is possible would it just mean that they would get the correct documentation from HFC and go through the process again?:confused:

 

Any advice would be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hitchy1

 

I'm replying just to try and give you some encouragement,

but I haven't got much time for the next few days to offer much practical help a

s I'm dealing with a couple of other court claims against me which I need to sort this week.

 

It might be possible to get your judgment set aside (and therefore the CO along with it) if you have sufficient grounds.

This can be difficult to achieve, but it can sometimes be done.

There are cases on CAG of people succeeding, but also failures.

 

ATM I am making moves to try and get a set aside,

although I haven't lodged the application yet,

just made the preliminary moves against the assignee (Marlin/Phoenix/Mortimer Clarke) of my judgment debt

(which like yours, also started out as HFC/Restons).

 

I don't know if you've seen the threads I've linked to below, but reading them may give you some idea of what you need to do.

I've linked my own thread but I'm not sure how useful you'll find it as I've not yet actually gone through the set aside process

- I have got a minor update to make to it regarding the response I've just received to my CPR 31.16 request,

but that will have to wait until I've dealt with the more pressing stuff mentioned above.

 

My task could well be as difficult as yours, or perhaps harder, as I originally admitted the debt (pre-CAG days).

 

Hopefully you'll have kept all the original paperwork (including things such as the Default Notice, maybe especially the DN!)

and you'll need to post up the whole story with details of everything so other CAGgers might advise you.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/123971-ccj-set-aside-help.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/192275-ccj-interest-debt.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/180864-finding-faulty-cca-agreements.html

 

Sorry I haven't got time to find and post the links regarding set aside guidelines etc.

but you'll probably come across those and other useful links in the threads above.

 

Cheers

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I have been paying a monthly figure for 5 years to Restons as they hold a charging order on my property.

 

I need to sell the house due to marraige breakdown and have found a buyer.

 

The excess money from the sale will not be enough to discharge the order and therefore i will continue paying the monthly payment.

 

Are Restons entitled to ask me to increase this payment?

 

this was not a provision in the original order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

AFAIK they can only demand you follow the court order. They could get it rexamined, but if your finances dont allow it, theyre out of luck.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this.

 

I was looking to increase the payment due to the fact that the equity wont cover the outstanding amount,

 

so i would be right in thinking that this would put the ball in my court

and not let them demand excessive payments?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to increase the payment, the creditor wont mind. But be careful as they will try and force you to increase it even further.

 

The problem is that the CO guarantees them some, if not all the money. They would need some sort of guarantee that you wont simply run off and leave them thousands out of pocket.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

merged your old threads on this here for ref

 

why did you never pursue getting the annulled?

 

hfc loan opened 2003 for £21k

can you scan up the agreement

can you scan up the statements from HFC

can you scan up the statements from CCCS

can you scan up the charging order

 

ever thought of PPI or PENALTY charges reclaiming????

.......................

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didnt really think i could win the case and financially couldnt afford to fight it.

Very soon i wont own a property so i will look into how i can deal with it as the payment will carry on for years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can I have those documents please I requested

 

let me get busy for you

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a feeling that they have all been destroyed and i would probably need to start the process again.

I will look for them in next few days but not confidant, the reason the house is being sold is due to divorce and much documentation was destroyed during the process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok then time to get them by sar again then.

 

so.. as you are sort of busy.

 

back to your recent question.

 

I would not be telling neither upping restons payment.

 

I would suspect that the balance they pushed through court

will be at least 50% PENALTY charges & PPI

which you can get back!!

 

as a ball park..what is owing now

and were you aware of the PENALTY charges

I don't know ANY HFC debt that was almost not doubled by charges/PPI.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Hitchy,

 

You really should heed DX's advice.

 

I have issues with HFC as well, and whilst there was no PPI on my account, they added penalty charges,

plus one of their other little delights known as a 'Collection Charge',

which is a large penalty charge that is calculated as a proportion of the outstanding balance, and completely unlawful.

 

It is entirely conceivable this has happened to you,

as they were very fond of tagging on such large charges.

 

If you reclaim these penalty charges and any PPI and seek interest in restitution,

it may well add up to a significant amount of money.

 

I know your objective was to seek a set-aside of the judgment,

and tbh, if I were you I would be pursuing it with zeal,

as their agreements leave much to be desired,

but you really should look at the PPI and penalty charge issues as well!

 

What an achievement it would be not only to get the judgment set-aside

but also to reclaim monies you're rightfully owed!

 

It really is worth doing! I wish you every success!

 

Figgy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well things have now gone from bad to worse.

 

My house has been sold only for the purchasers to change their minds after i moved out and before exchange of contracts.

 

I now have a house that i can no longer afford and little prospect of it being sold quickly.

 

The mortgage company have suggested voluntary surrender but i would need to agree with my ex who just doesn't seem bothered.

 

Anyone who can suggest a course of action please?

 

The outstanding mortgage is £145k and the sale had been agreed at £148 which would have left a reasonable situation,

 

my concern now is that the house could be sold for significantly less.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take the house off the market for a week and put it back on, then you can sell it quickly (in the intervening week clear out as much stuff as you can - unless this hasn't already been done). This happened to a friend recently and when the house went back onto the market they put it on for 20K higher than they had originally and accepted an offer for 15K higher, which more than covered any additional mortgage payment.

 

Try NOT to voluntary surrender the property as they will quickly sell it and then charge you around 5K in charges and anything else they can dream up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The property is empty save for curtains and also a tv and sound system installed in lounge which the prospective purchasers were going to buy. The mortgage company also suggested an assisted sale. My understanding of this is that they would give me time to try and find a new buyer but that charges would still apply at some point. The house value is around £165k but i had agreed a price at £148k purely to get rid and

Ay solicitor/ estate agent fees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would get NOTHING and owe a shortfall on an 'assisted sale', and as I said, their 'fees' would more than wipe out any residual income.

 

Speak to the Estate Agent who handled the original sale and ask them to 'hold' the property for a week then remarket it as a vacant property for full market value, that way you could still get a quick turnaround and maybe have a bit of a profit. They may even have another buyer lurking in the background.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What about buildings insurance and council tax?

I would struggle to pay these as i have moved out and am paying bills on a rental property.

 

Would also guess that the premium on buildings will be higher on an empty property.

Also without the mortgage company agreement the monthly mortgage would be due which is £700 the mortgage company did say they would work with the original estate agent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...