Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC/Restons CCJ & CO - Selling property. Heeeeeeelp


hitchy1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3749 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Stop panicking and calm down.

 

If a property is empty and non residential then the local council should do a reduction in the tax.

 

I can't help on the buildings insurance but I would imagine that if you DONT inform the company that the property is empty then there should be no problem, I believe you only need to inform them if the property is non-residential for 6 weeks or more.... at least that was what happened when my Aunt recently sold her property. The insurance company in her case said there was provision for this (some people do go away for longer rather than shorter periods these days).

 

The more you try and worry about the situation the more scenarios you come up with. Deal with things on a day to day basis. I would recommend ringing the Estate Agents on Monday and ask them to co-operate with YOU rather than the mortgage company for the next few weeks. Remember THEY are instructed by YOU and NOT the mortgage lender at the moment.

 

The mortgage company have a 'vested interest' in 'working' with the original Estate Agent and they would not help at the moment, only hinder (believe me, I've been there and suffered the consequences).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Your plan for Monday is

 

1. Inform the council that the property is vacant - they should offer a 3 month 'relief' on the council tax.

2. Inform the Estate Agents the original sale has collapsed (they probably know anyway), say you want the place taken off the market for a week then remarketed at a higher price...

 

Take it day to day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Todays update.

 

Went to council tax office,

they only offer 25% relief so will have to pay £96 per month in the meantime.

 

Also buildings cover is expensive on an empty property £155 for 3 months.

 

Gas and electric will need to stay at a low level to avoid freezing pipes.

 

I have instructed estate agents to try and sell and have given a deadline of end of January,

unfortunately if it doesnt sell by then i will have to voluntary surrender.

 

Fingers crossed. I will inform mortgage company tomorrow that i am remarketing until the end of January and not paying them in the meantime.......should be interesting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Update:

 

finally i have a sale which is £2k below what i need

but the mortgage company have accepted the proposal to pay the shortfall

and Restons have agreed to release the charging order.

 

Interesting thing with Restons is that i have commenced paying the ccj payment again which is £35 per month.

 

Their documentation sent to me indicates that there is £22k outstanding

but the paperwork i received from the lender and who receive the money indicates £16k.

 

I smell a rat but dont know what to do.

 

Im 90% certain that the judge did not allow any interest payments when they won the ccj

but i have lost the paperwork relating to this, all i know was that it was in 2005.

 

I also checked the original loan and i did not take ppi.

 

Can anyone advise on how i should now deal with the ccj/charging order please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would 'doubt' they were given permission to charge post judgemental interest.

 

of 3 ccj's I know for that era pestons did not request it

and would probably been told to ...by the judge.

 

the only way you can get to the bottom

of this is to demand to see the paperwork pestons are relying upon.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought you'd already been to the court before and they said they hold no details.

 

you need

an sar to HFC did you do that in nov when you said you would,.....

 

until you get all the paperwork again from every source

 

all you can do is refuse restons post judgemental int

and ask them to prove its on the CCJ

 

and referred to on the CO.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely i can get a copy of the ccj ?

Wont this tell me the details.

 

Im not trying to avoid the monthly fee just to ensure they are not adding costs to it.

I already have a statement from HFC in July 2013 showing 16k outstanding and i dont dispute that

What i dont understand is how Restons are saying it is £22k.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok well you need all the paperwork from whatever source

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would very much doubt the court will have any details now sadly

do you know the CCJ number

 

if you do ring northants directly and ask

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

was this 2005 ccj or 2009?

 

you give both dates in this threads time.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CRA file might well have the number yes.

 

was it transferred to your local court?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry i was away last night.

The date was 2005 and it was heard in my local court and i did attend.

I am virtually certain the judge stipulated no additional charges and no increase in interest was to be applied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

both!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I contacted the local county court

 

who gave me a website to do a search on myself.

 

The cost was £4 and the result was nothing on record.

 

Im guessing that might be because of the length of time.

 

I am hesitant to contact Restons at the moment as the house sale is not yet complete.

 

Are they obliged to send me a copy of the judgement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean they poked you to trustonline?

 

what as the point of that

other than you needed the number so's they could look in up?

 

if this was a 2005 ccj it wont be on there

its expired

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but im getting more confused.

 

If it's expired why do Restons have to release the charging order so the property can be sold.

 

Also i am still paying the monthly fee as agreed in court in 2005.

 

Surely if i stopped paying they would take me straight back to court for not complying with a ccj!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the charge on the property does not expire till paid.

 

I would seriously be stating to restons

that you refuse to pay any interest until they PROVE by a copy of the relevant court

docs they ARE entitled too it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...