Jump to content


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3925 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Oh I see, I have always had a problem with hypothetical, i made the mistake of not living in the world you have created.

 

As the discussion was about the changes due to take place in April 2014,it was pretty clear that the scenario was a hyperthetical one (unless of course you thought I could see into the future)

 

Don't let the facts get in the way of a good story eh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

As the discussion was about the changes due to take place in April 2014,it was pretty clear that the scenario was a hyperthetical one (unless of course you thought I could see into the future)

 

Don't let the facts get in the way of a good story eh?

 

The position regarding the levying of goods will not alter in 2014, once the order/ warrant has been issued the goods can be removed by the bailiff, there is no difference there.

 

As commented before you seem to lack a basic grasp of the procedure, it is no good accusing bailiffs of breaking the law when they are not, it just , frankly makes you look foolish.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The position regarding the levying of goods will not alter in 2014, once the order/ warrant has been issued the goods can be removed by the bailiff, there is no difference there.

 

As commented before you seem to lack a basic grasp of the procedure, it is no good accusing bailiffs of breaking the law when they are not, it just , frankly makes you look foolish.

 

"basic grasp of procedure"??

 

I'm still waiting for any of you to explain how the levy on that other thread was legal when no act of impounding took place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really????

 

Well as we were on about April 2014 onwards,it should be pretty obvious that no-one has had any experience but my original answer should have helped the penny drop for you as to why it would not be looked upon favourably by a judge-Not that experience is needed to have made the statement in the first place.

 

 

 

Forgive me, you sounded like you had some actual experience or authority in the subject.

 

Now I see that you are basing your opinion from information read on the internet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgive me, you sounded like you had some actual experience or authority in the subject.

 

Now I see that you are basing your opinion from information read on the internet.

 

I do have some actual experience of county court proceedings,including a pending hearing over bailiff conduct & fees-As I said,experience would not be essential in that instance so I'm not sure why you're waxing lyrical over such a minor,trivial point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3925 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...