Jump to content

danmcr

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    117
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

25 Excellent
  1. No he is not, he should be a Certificated Enforcement Agent. It has nothing to do with HC enforcement unless it has been to Court (which it hasn't). Please check to see if his name is on the register: https://certificatedbailiffs.justice.gov.uk/CertificatedBailiffs/ This really need's looking into as something is wrong.
  2. You may be liable for enforcement fees as the Council will pass all payments onto the enforcement company who will then split the payments as per the regulations.
  3. CRAR is only available for use at the demised premises only! Not your home address, next door or your mates house. It has nothing to do with a High Court Enforcement Officer or High Court Bailiff as you put it, only a Certificated Enforcement Agent. The first letter you will get is a notice of enforcement not an "avoidance notice" Court Enforcement Services is a private company headed up by ex Marston directors and a HCEO and I'm guessing the name they use is to try and make it look like some form of official court department. Also Forfeiture cannot be done at the same time as CRAR or vice versa.
  4. Forget CRAR, it hasn't been used it seems, it seems the council have taken you to Court and then transferred the matter to the High Court for enforcement. What is the "Avoidance notice" I've never heard of it and it's not a prescribed form for taking control of goods One of the other helpful members will be along soon to help, but it seems to me either something has gone wrong with the enforcement route or the full story isn't apparent.
  5. Sounds like unpaid rent which has ended up in Court then transferred up to HC for enforcement.
  6. This cannot be CRAR as; 1. CRAR can only be used at the demised premises. (commercial only, no residential element attached) 2. CRAR has nothing to do with High Court Enforcement. Something is not right!
  7. A HCEO may enter a property to seize the defendants good's as commanded by the writ, you are correct in stating force may not be used however there is still a right of peaceful entry. Any person wilfully resisting or obstructing a HCEO commits a criminal offence and runs the risk of being arrested by the HCEO or a constable. Applying to set a Judgment aside does not mean it will be set aside, there are a number of factors such as time limits. You may not also be aware that to stop a HCEO you must also apply for a stay on the execution not just setting the judgment aside.
  8. Please do not give advice if you do not understand the rights and powers of a HCEO! To the OP am someone will be along shortly to assist with your problem
  9. You may find that Bailiffs can still be used under certain tenancy agreements, however I have not heard of this for a while.
  10. There are provisions for forced entry but this is normally to change a meter to pay/token meter etc.
  11. I am on the understanding that good's can be liable for remove and the HCEO can apply for relief as you are married, however can still be wrong. Maybe HCEO can assist further with this as he/she has more knowledge on such matters.
  12. I have posted a link above which you can follow to help understand.
  13. This is the only thing online that is easy to read for the OP to understand: http://tinyurl.com/kbwvr52
×
×
  • Create New...