Jump to content


New RUTHBRIDGE Customer: advise please


reginder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3985 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I have read a number of the thread on Ruthbridge and could really use your advise on the best action in my particular case.

 

Received first ever letter from Ruthbridge - It was addressed correctly to my name (unusal spelling), but contained no details about the alleged debt amount or alleged creditor. Just the general 'please call us' bit.

 

There are 2 things I guess this could be related to: either a storecard for about £50 in 2001, or a disputed debt with the also totally dodgy gas/electric company Spark.

 

If the latter then it is only about 2 years ago

- I made a formal complaint/dispute to Spark at the time and received no reponse.

 

At the time I was dealing with a different DCA, who were actually very reasonable and agreed that Spark's actions were illegal and I didn't owe anything.

 

So - do I send a request for clarification of this so-called debt, or is it best to file it and ignore it?

 

If they call me, I won't begiving them any info and guarantee I will have some fun with them.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd be ignoring them

 

check your cra file see below

 

make sure its not being trashed

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, ignore Ruthbridge until they state clearly what they are chasing, more often than not they are chasing statute barred debt.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO re its spark whom several threads here indicate speculative demands/contracts

and

a DCA known to send out letters to spoof people on debts

 

i'd be ignoring them all

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with dx until mr. Ammisah and his crew a tctually 'come clean' do not respond, it seems clear that the debt is stat barred.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...