Jump to content


Mortimer Clark - old HFC marbles card


cdmonkey
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4040 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

what when there is a charging order...

 

no need.

 

they are trying to fleece the debtor

where no CCJ debt exists whereby payment was requested.

 

left arm right leg situation

 

peston royally did the debtor over.

 

time to get all the info and get reclaiming.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

yes why not...

 

could be funny.

 

as for the sar it always goes to the OC ....HFC

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The company can continue to operate while their application to renew the CCL is being prcessed which often takes a very long tim.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was always told it was a waste of time and money sending a cca request for a ccj as the ccj took precedence over any agreement.

I guess though that depending on the date a lack of one could be used to get the CO and ccj set aside. Maybe some legal advice is needed.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes but...

 

if it came to the future and it turned out there was a chance of getting this turned around

it will be needed

 

plus sadly i think HFC will put the 6yrs rule here as they ALWAYS do on dodgy cases

 

the CCJ was 2007 we dont know when the debt was take out, could be gone already

 

the key here as get as much info as possible

 

you never know when it will be needed

 

but sure as eggs is eggs

 

something big time smells here

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so took pestons 2yrs to go for the CCJ.

 

i hope HFC still have the info

 

but me thinks thats gone in the shredder pretty quick now.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

More nonsense from MC today.

 

I have finally got a statement of recent payments and MC have added interest to the charging order !

 

I believe any agreement under CCA 1974 with a CCJ and resulting charging order cannot have interest added ?

 

This was originally a Marbles credit card taken out in 2000

 

Any help appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

correct!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd make a spreadsheet too

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

they have charged you int of x figure every month

 

you are entitled to it back.

 

FOSCISHEET

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

did that sar go off?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

It just gets better also had the attached letter from MC today even though i wrote to them in Feb and told them they are not allowed to charge interest on a charging order resulting from a CCJ of a debt which came in CCA 1974 (no reply of course)

 

Looks like a standard mailshot to me ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...