Jump to content


Private PCN - should I pay


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4710 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all I'm new to this forum & have a problem which I am hoping someone can help me with

can you offer me some accurate advice please

I received a PCN for parking in Aldi whilst driving my sons car. This is the info:

 

Registered keeper - my son, who did not commit the alleged offence & in fact he was on holiday abroad at the time so should be no problem in proving he did not commit the offence

 

There is a sign in the car park stating maximum stay 2 hours & no return within 4 hours, also displays fine price of £70 - no excuses here I just didn't read it, I thought it was just stating for Aldi customers only.

I did go in the store first to buy some food items & then nipped across the raod (town area) & probably ended up being longer than intended....it states entered at 12.01 & departed 15.06y

 

It offers a reduced fee of £40 if pay within 10 days

 

I have read that these people do not have any legal right to issue fines & of course the fine is adressed to my son but he was not the driver. This sort of thing really gets me annoyed but I am just worried on backlash for my son & don't want to get him into trouble.

 

Urgent advice needed

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is ParkingEye. Do they actually go as far as issuing Court Proceedings....or send round Bailiffs. My main concern is hassling letters to my son. I know the general consensu is 'ignore'...but would you at least think it a good idea for my son to reply, stating that he may be the registered keeper but he was not the driver & he was not even in the country on the date of the incident & that this can be proven....just wondered if it would 'nip it in the bud'...in the hope that they just think it's not worth persuing ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is ParkingEye. Do they actually go as far as issuing Court Proceedings

PE never issue court claims

 

....or send round Bailiffs.

Nobody will turn up on your doorstep

 

My main concern is hassling letters to my son.

Just ignore them and file

 

I know the general consensu is 'ignore'...but would you at least think it a good idea for my son to reply, stating that he may be the registered keeper but he was not the driver & he was not even in the country on the date of the incident & that this can be proven....just wondered if it would 'nip it in the bud'...in the hope that they just think it's not worth persuing ???

, The moment you communicate with them in any way, as far as they are concerned it means you are taking them seriously and they will merely hound you all the more. They couldn't give a toss who was driving, in or out of the country etc they only interested in trying to scare money out of you. Stand firm, ignore.
Link to post
Share on other sites

That's up to him. If he so chooses he could write to them saying that he was not driving the car at the time and jsut leave it it that. He has no legal obligation to provide a PPC with any information what so ever. The PPC can only issue their 'invoice' against the person who entered into the 'contract' which is the driver. The other issue is that they cannot persue a 'penalty' or 'fine' as they have no legal status. they can however, persue losses or damages so you do the maths on that. a charge of even £40 would be seen as disproportionate to any 'losses' that they have incurred, especially when the parking is free!

 

If they took it to court (which they won't), they would have to convince the judge that their 'charge' in fact isn't a penalty.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the Thomas case sets no precedent and so is irelevant.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah thats interesting I didnt know that

 

For the Thomas case to be precedent it would have to be confirmed in the Appeal Court, and to be watertight for the PPC it would need to go even higher, as each case is decided on it's merits, and the circumstances were particular to Mr Thomas's actions

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do they actually go as far as issuing Court Proceedings

No they don't normally.

....or send round Bailiffs.

Bailiffs wouldn't get involved until they had a decision from the courts and as this shower don't normally do court then you won't see the,m. They may hassle your son with Debt Collectors who have absolutely no power to enforce a debt. The usual form is letters as they can't usually get a phone number.

 

FWIW I've had a couple of letters from another muppet outfit (PPC) which I have successfully ignored. Haven't seen hide nor hair of Court Don't try to nip it in the bud. Tell your son what happened and tell him to ignore their crap. The more you ignore the sooner they go away.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...