I worried I'd missed stuff on the pdf I'll re-post once I've edited properly. Also, I did note to write to them about email not being a mode of contact, from bradfordlad's thread. What does the 'case stay lifted' refer to? Is it just a formality for them to have it lifted, and does it mean that they missed some deadlines?

When sending the CPR, is there any benefit to request photographs of the car being parked or do the company only need entry and exit stamps? I'm fairly sure that the driver would have taken a few trips through the drive-through to get top-ups of coffee- this was during Covid lockdown times and everyone was remote working, so I can only guess that whoever the driver was was doing some work remotely and probably just lost track of time? The car park doesn't require exit of the car park to re-enter the drive-through, and re-order.

Great, thanks. This is the final PDF of all the letters received. I think I've redacted all the relevant bits. I will get the CPR sent. Is there anything specific I need to add for the DQ- I assume I say Y to mediation, N to suitability for determination without a hearing, ask for it to be at my local County Court or remote, and am the only witness? I also have not been able to identify the driver to the parking company. Also, does this have to be posted or is there any way to email it? (I did try to contact the court for this earlier but was on hold throughout my lunch break so couldn't get through) Final Compressed Single PDF of letters, UKPC-DCB(L) PCN Claimform-McDonald-s Ardwick Manchester Stockport Road.pdf Final Compressed Single PDF of letters, UKPC-DCB(L) PCN Claimform-McDonald-s Ardwick Manchester Stockport Road.pdf

Hi @FTMDave, Thanks for the heads-up. Just to check, have you removed that document now and I need to re-upload?

1 Date of the infringement 26/10/2020 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 30/11/2020 (cannot find an earlier letter- fairly sure I would not have discarded it... ) 3 Date received Unsure 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] N 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Y 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] N 7 Who is the parking company? Uk parking control Limited 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Mcdonald's, Ardwick, Manchester, Stockport Road For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA Notification letter UK parking control limited McDonald-s Ardwick Manchester.pdf N1 UK parking control limited (McDonald-s, Ardwick, Manchester)-1.pdf

Which Court have you received the claim from ? MCOL Northampton N1 ? If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. (not the response page or AOS) Name of the Claimant : UK Parking Control Limited Claimants Solicitors: DCB Legal Date of issue – 20 APR 2023 Date for AOS - 8 May 2023 Date to submit Defence - 22 May 2023 What is the claim for – Particulars of Claim 1. The Defendant(D) is indebted to the Claimant (C) for a Parking Charge(s) issued to vehicle AA11 AAA at McDonalds Ardwick 327, 129 Stockport Road, ardwick, m12 4ab 2. The PCN details are 26/10/2020, ************* 3.The PCN(s) was issued on private land owned or managed by C. The vehicle was parked in breach of the Terms on Cs signs (the Contract), thus incurring the PCN(s). 4. The driver agreed to pay within 28 days but did not. D is liable as the driver or keeper. Despite requests, the PCN(s) is outstanding. The Contract entitles C to damages. AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS 1. £170 being the total of the PCN(s) and damages. 2. Interest at a rate of 8% per annum pursuant to s.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 from the date hereof at a daily rate of £0.02 until judgment or sooner payment. 3. Costs and court fees What is the value of the claim? £170 Amount Claimed £205.04 court fees £35.00 legal rep fees £50.00 Total Amount £290.04 Have you moved since the issuance of the PCN? N Did you receive a letter of Claim With A reply Pack wanting I&E etc about 1mth before the claimform? Y, dated 17 March 2023, I did not reply

Thanks for the prompt replies- I'll get to work on getting it all PDF'd and will upload shortly. I did not send a CPR 31.14 after getting the claim form from DCBL. The defence I filed is as follows (I think it may have been sourced from this same forum?): The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. The Defendant was the recorded keeper of AA11 AAA. 2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Defendant has not been provided with any information to identify the driver at the time of the incident in question. 6. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer, at a disproportionate amount. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. 8. Further defence documentation will follow receipt of further details to enrich the current particulars of claim, furnishing the Defendant with more (any) concrete points on which the Claimant brings this claim.

Hi all, Apologies if I regularly sound thick when trying to understand things going forwards. I was always under the impression that these private company fines can be ignored but finally had one catch up with me and became a more formal thing. I checked some online forums and wrote up a reply to be uploaded onto MCOL website. I made the mistake of entering my email address and they contacted me by email to say that I should settle: Good afternoon Having reviewed the content of your defence, we write to inform you that our client intends to proceed with the claim. In due course, the Court will direct both parties to each file a directions questionnaire. In preparation for that, please find attached a copy of the Claimant's, which we confirm has been filed with the Court. Without Prejudice to the above, in order to assist the Court in achieving its overriding objective, our client may be prepared to settle this case - in the event you wish to discuss settlement, please call us on 0203 434 0433 within 7 days and make immediate reference to this correspondence. If you have provided an email address within your Defence, we intend to use it for service of documents (usually in PDF format) hereon in pursuant to PD 6A (4.1)(2)(c). Please advise whether there are any limitations to this (for example, the format in which documents are to be sent and the maximum size of attachments that may be received). Unless you advise otherwise, we will assume not. Kind Regards, Cameron Miller DCB Legal Ltd I did not make any contact and have since received a notice of proposed allocation to small claims track. I did check the mcol intermittently and could not see any updates so had hoped it had gone away. However, that has the following as latest updates: Claim Status A claim was issued against you on 20/04/2023 Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 09/05/2023 at 14:54:46 Your acknowledgment of service was received on 10/05/2023 at 08:05:16 Your defence was submitted on 22/05/2023 at 13:17:06 Your defence was received on 22/05/2023 at 16:05:06 Case Stay Lifted on 14/08/2023 DQ sent to you on 14/08/2023 DQ filed by claimant on 14/08/2023 What does the "case stay lifted" mean? Would it have been stayed because they missed a deadline or is this now something that I am going to have to go to court for? It appears to be related to a parking issue at a McDonald's car park, where multiple purchases were made but apparently some max parking time deadlines were exceeded. Amount Claimed £205.04 Court Fee £35.00 Solicitor Costs £50.00 Total Amount £290.04 Issue Date 20/04/2023 I would really appreciate any advice and help on next steps. I have been given until 31st August ti complete a small claims direction questionnaire. Thanks NS