Jump to content


Post-Carey (was the decision correct)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4909 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

What I say, will have no legal implications whatsoever, there will not be a change in the law, and my comments will melt away like a snowman in summertime.

 

It :-x me when I see lenders blatantly abusing Section 78 disclosure requirements. Yet again I've received DIFFERENT supposedly 'TRUE COPIES' of an executed agreement where the interest rates/APR's do not match up. For those in the legal profession............. I've even received TTC on an assumed £1500 credit limit for agreements PRE 1999!!!! I'll let you decide if that's correct. These problems tend to come to light once proceedings have been issued for different reasons.

 

Just waiting to see how our applications to amend POC's will go especially when the solicitors acting on behalf of the lenders see absolutely nothing wrong in providing these different documents.

 

In principle, Carey was correct, but it has unleashed the worse in some lenders so I'm beginnning to change my position slightly.

 

That's my moan for the day. :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...