Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

My elderly Mum left in the lurch, pleasee help


nellio
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5067 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sold my car last week for £4000 to pay my elderly Mum back for helping us out of debt. The guy who bought the car paid by cheque so I told him that I would give him the car once the cheque cleared. I paid the cheque in on Tuesday 13th July.

 

Immediately my balance showed the £4000 in account but NOT available balance. My account showed the same until Friday 16th which then said available balance. Using the internet banking service I transferred £3700 into my Mum's account. Obviously Mum was happy to have saving put on an even keel and went and spent £1200 on a holiday for her and Dad.

 

This morning the cheque has been returned and the bank have taken the liberty of taking the £3700 from my Mum's account which will have put her £1200 overdrawn straight away.

 

Surely I'm liable for that money until I sort it out with the guy who bought the car and not my Mum. How dare they access her account without her permission. She has been with the bank almost 30 years and never been so much as a penny overdrawn.

 

What with my daily radio therapy and my Mum's weak heart this has caused all matter of problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I am sorry to hear of your problem. I hope the purchaser has made an genuine mistake with the cheque and it is nothing more than that.

 

I am no expert on this sort of matter but I think the Co-op have probably protected themselves on this sort of thing for your own account, in the T & C's with regards the cashing of the cheque. In my smile T & C's is this, so probably the same for your Co-op account:

2.3 A cheque paid into your account may be returned unpaid. If this happens we will tell you and the amount may be taken from your account. We may ask for payment again from the bank of the person who issued the cheque or return it to you. If you withdraw some or all of the amount of a cheque which is later returned unpaid and this withdrawal or the unpaid cheque causes your account to go overdrawn or over any formal overdraft limit this will be considered an informal request to access our overdraft services in accordance with condition 13. You can assume that at the end of six business days, the cheque is cleared. After this time you are protected from any loss if the cheque is subsequently returned unpaid, unless it is found to be fraudulent or you are a knowing party to fraud.

I must admit I didn't realise that before six days they could do this :eek:

 

But for the bit about reversing a payment to another account seems very dodgy. When (for a much smaller amount) I had mistyped an account number for an online-payment which had left my account, I called and asked what the situation was about getting it back and they said, (apart from more fool you for typing it in wrong :oops:), it is your responsibility to enter details correctly. AND 'there is nothing we can do once the money has left your account'. In my case there was no account matching the number so the money came back after a few days - phew!

 

The Bank should have contacted you as per their condition above, and then which ever bank should have at least contacted your mum to ask for the money back? Perhaps come to some agreement on how to repay the money under the circumstances. Perhaps even honour* the amount while the situation is resolved. After all your Mum was expecting a payment and acted in good faith. It is not like your mum just happened to "find" some money in her account and went and spent it without considering where it came from. For example if the DWP messed up on my DLA payments and paid too much they would not just get their bank to swipe it back? They would have to ask for it back. I know when I was over paid by previous employer one month they didn't just take it back, the Personnel bod rather red faced came up to me and said we've coc##d up - we came to an amicable agreement. Surely even if your mum's account is with the same Bank they can't do that without authorisation / request?

 

But I do wonder though if the Bank are trying to get away with this under the guise of fraud so they think they can do anything?

 

I would be asking your mum's bank to be lenient regarding probable overdraft charges while the situation is looked at.

 

I know these are not directly related but these are interesting non the less. 1) Someone made a payment to the wrong live account 2) The Financial Ombudsmen Service commenting on mistaken credits.

 

BBC NEWS | Business | When click of a mouse cost £2,000

 

banking: mistaken credits - issue 33 - Nov 2003

 

Hopefully someone with a few more grey cells than me will be along to give you their view on this.

 

Best of luck.

 

* or is that an oxymoron; bank and honour in the same sentence :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...