Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Another website


AndyCex
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6460 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

I've put up a few pages on my website regarding these charges. Not sure if i'm allowed to put the address in here though.

Could a mod reply and let me know.

I'm not making any money off it, i just think the more pages on the net there are about this the more chance of more people finding out.

Mostly links to this forum to be fair.

 

I'm in the early stages of my claim. Have sent 1st letter. Leaflet response. Am sending second letter in 2 days.

 

Thanks.

 

Andy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's fine.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much Dave.

 

Here is the link.

 

**----D-tour Records----**

 

It is probably nothing people on here havn't heard before but i guess its good to have more pages about it eh?

 

Send people along to it if you have the oppurtunity.

 

Thank you.

 

Andy.

 

ps. I am not making any money from this so please don't hesitate to encourage others to visit. I only want to help, not rip people off. Banks do that well enough by themselves. Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice site.

Thanks for the links and the references.

 

You could warn people to read and inform themselves before they jump in

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much.

 

I have added a little warning about reading up first.

 

Thanks for your support.

 

If there is anything i (D-tour records) can do to help and support not only this forum but the wider community of people trying to fight injustice please do let me know. My company is all about "stamping out bad stuff". We are only small but everyone starts somewhere right?

Also if you know of any other causes that i could as a web based company support please do let me know.

 

info@d-tourrecords.co.uk

 

Thanks.

 

Andy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good work Andy.

Lloyds TSB - £972

S.A.R, prelim and LBA sent

Claim acknowledged

Defence received

AQ 20/06/06

***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 20/07/06***

 

Woolwich - £2288

S.A.R, prelim and LBA sent.

Offered half

Moneyclaim filed online 02/08/06

Judgement filed online 23/08/06

WARRANT FILED ONLINE 30/08/06

MONEY RECEIVED BY BALIFF 04/10/06

***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 09/10/06***

 

Smile - £175

Pelim 23/06/06

***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 07/07/06***

 

My Ex vs Woolwich - £715

S.A.R sent 30/08/06

Pelim 06/10/06

LBA 20/10/06

 

Advice & opinions provided are personal, and not endorsed by CAG or BAG, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice one, Andy,

 

That looks really good, and hopefully should get a few more visitors flying in.

 

Just one thing I'd take issue with, (I think), and this goes back to dredging my memory for some 'A' level law 25 years ago, I'm not sure that you DO have to pay for something accidently broken in a shop etc. As far as I'm aware, and someone please correct me if I'm wrong, the notices which state, 'all breakages must be paid for', etc are simply disclaimers, (same as 'vehicles left at owner's risk', in a car park), and do not hold any validity in law.

 

A small point, I know, but if we, collectively, are trying to give sound, correct, legal advice and guidance, then it would be a shame if someone were to read that and walk away with false information.

 

I've had a look around, and so far can only find a couple of other forum comments, on other websites, which support this view, not any 'law' as such, but I'll keep looking.

 

Once again, your link is fab, and good of you to take the time to produce it.

 

Regards,

 

Pedantic Pete

NatWest, claimed £521.00, settled in full.

Data Protection Act to LTSB (sent 15th June) Received statements 10/7/2006. Claiming £570.50. Sent claim 17th July Reply received 21st July. (sent LBA 22nd July) Then the procrastination started. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/11169-peters-progress.html

Settled in full £905.18, confirmation faxed to the court the day before I appeared, which meant I didn't know 'til the Judge told me.

Letter requesting disclosure of account info from Thoburn's bailiffs. (sent) Data Protection Act to follow.

Ooh, the suspenders is killing me!

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I WON!!! I got all my money back (£525) for the last year!

Abbey sent me a rather confusing letter saying basically that they wernt wrong, i was wrong for saying they were wrong......"but we're still going to pay you.....in full"....... but we're not wrong.....

 

Hehe!!

 

Chuffed!

 

Thanks to consumeractiongroup for your support!

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks mate.

 

Done and dusted.

 

I will be sending a letter to Abbey thanking them for the refund. And right behind it a letter asking for the charges back for my other account.

 

Thanks again.

 

Andy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good work, well please for you.

Lloyds TSB - £972

S.A.R, prelim and LBA sent

Claim acknowledged

Defence received

AQ 20/06/06

***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 20/07/06***

 

Woolwich - £2288

S.A.R, prelim and LBA sent.

Offered half

Moneyclaim filed online 02/08/06

Judgement filed online 23/08/06

WARRANT FILED ONLINE 30/08/06

MONEY RECEIVED BY BALIFF 04/10/06

***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 09/10/06***

 

Smile - £175

Pelim 23/06/06

***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 07/07/06***

 

My Ex vs Woolwich - £715

S.A.R sent 30/08/06

Pelim 06/10/06

LBA 20/10/06

 

Advice & opinions provided are personal, and not endorsed by CAG or BAG, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...