Jump to content


Blackhorse Car HP - Claim issued


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4808 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok thanks!

 

Will start constructing defence over next few days, aswell as the above, and all the section 88 and 87 bits regarding the notice and inaccurate figures, reference to woodchester case etc

 

Is there anything else i need to include?

 

Also as asked earlier due to the interest been calculated on an incorrect balance this would then make the total amount of interest wrong would it not?

 

Thanks for all the help

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

On the defence form there is not much room to put down my points, do i just carry on, on a serpate sheet or enter my defence on a witness statement?

 

Thanks

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys

 

Any advice to posts 51 and 54?

 

Thanks

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the defence form there is not much room to put down my points, do i just carry on, on a serpate sheet or enter my defence on a witness statement?

 

Thanks

I would say that it would be best if you do your defence on a separate piece of paper and just write on the defence form "see attached" or something to that effect.

 

Your defence does have to be set out in a specific way; stating which court it is to be heard in, claimant and defendant names, claim number and then verified by a statement of truth at the bottom.

 

i.e.

IN THE XXXXXX COUNTY COURT

 

CLAIM NUMBER: XXXXX

BETWEEN

 

 

Black Horse Claimant

And

Jamesx81x Defendant

 

STATEMENT OF DEFENCE

1) My name is Jamesx81x, I am a Litigant in Person and the defendant in this case. This is my Statement of Defence.

 

2) xxxx

 

3) and so on..

 

 

The statement of truth also has to be word specific:

 

Statement of Truth

I believe that the facts stated in this statement of defence are true.

Full name: Mr Jamesx81x

Signed________________________

(Defendant)

 

 

CPR 16.5 tells you everything you should know about what should be in your defence:

 

Content of defence

 

16.5

 

(1) In his defence, the defendant must state –

(a) which of the allegations in the particulars of claim he denies;

 

(b) which allegations he is unable to admit or deny, but which he requires the claimant to prove; and

 

© which allegations he admits.

 

 

(2) Where the defendant denies an allegation –

(a) he must state his reasons for doing so; and

 

(b) if he intends to put forward a different version of events from that given by the claimant, he must state his own version.

 

 

(3) A defendant who –

(a) fails to deal with an allegation; but

 

(b) has set out in his defence the nature of his case in relation to the issue to which that allegation is relevant,

 

shall be taken to require that allegation to be proved.

 

(4) Where the claim includes a money claim, a defendant shall be taken to require that any allegation relating to the amount of money claimed be proved unless he expressly admits the allegation.

 

(5) Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4), a defendant who fails to deal with an allegation shall be taken to admit that allegation.

 

(6) If the defendant disputes the claimant’s statement of value under rule 16.3 he must –

(a) state why he disputes it; and

 

(b) if he is able, give his own statement of the value of the claim.

 

 

(7) If the defendant is defending in a representative capacity, he must state what that capacity is.

 

(8) If the defendant has not filed an acknowledgment of service under Part 10, the defendant must give an address for service.

 

(Part 22 requires a defence to be verified by a statement of truth)

(Rule 6.23 provides that an address for service must be within the United Kingdom)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thank you for that appreciate it!

 

Can get started on defence now.

 

Do i just send it to the court or send a copy to the claimant also?

 

Thanks :)

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thank you for that appreciate it!

 

Can get started on defence now.

 

Do i just send it to the court or send a copy to the claimant also?

 

Thanks :)

No prob ;)

I would take 2 copies to the court so they can send one to them, but probably send one to them yourself too, recorded delivery just to be on the safe side :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks will do that!

 

Am i also entitled to claim costs things such as resarch, form filling etc?

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

At what point would i need to submit this to the court?

 

Thanks

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

When sending a copy of the defence to the claimant, would giving them a chance to settle out of court be wrong or would it show i have tried to keep it out of the courts one final time in addition to my attempts before they brought the claim?

 

Thanks Guys!

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also another matter that i have gone over is regarding the charges and Late Payment Interest on the agreement.

 

Under the agreement there is the HP side and a seperate loan account for insurances as detailed earlier on in the thread.

 

I stopped making payments on the loan(insurances) but maintained the HP payments for the car itself. With this in mind as it is the loan account i stopped paying on why have all the collection charges and Late Payment Interest been added to the HP side of my agreement?

 

Surely these should be applied to the insurance loan agreement should they not?

 

Appreciate the advice guys!

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, got your pm :) Don't worry about people not finding your thread, anybody that has commented so far will already be subscribed and will get notifications of any new posts. Things are always a bit quiet on the weekend as people try to catch up with their non-cag lives!! :D I'm sure you will get a lot more help now your thread is in Vehicle Repos.

 

When sending a copy of the defence to the claimant, would giving them a chance to settle out of court be wrong or would it show i have tried to keep it out of the courts one final time in addition to my attempts before they brought the claim?

 

Thanks Guys!

Any attempts to settle out of court are always favourable, in fact if you can show that you have attempted to settle and they have refused your offers it can only count against them and they may end up being viewed as vexatious litigants!

 

 

Also another matter that i have gone over is regarding the charges and Late Payment Interest on the agreement.

 

Under the agreement there is the HP side and a seperate loan account for insurances as detailed earlier on in the thread.

 

I stopped making payments on the loan(insurances) but maintained the HP payments for the car itself. With this in mind as it is the loan account i stopped paying on why have all the collection charges and Late Payment Interest been added to the HP side of my agreement?

 

Surely these should be applied to the insurance loan agreement should they not?

 

Appreciate the advice guys!

If you are up to date with your HP agreement and only behind on your loan agreement then absolutely I would think the charges should be added to the loan agreement! I would actually go so far as to question their right to enter a return of goods claim if the default relates to insurance premiums??!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also missed payments on the Hp leading up to the default.

 

I asked the question regarding the charges as i do not see how they can be added along with Late Payment Interest to the HP side of the agreement when it was the loan payments been missed.

 

I only missed payments on the car from Feb until May this year, 4 payments in total but they have been adding charges and interest since i stopped making payments on the insurance back in Sept 2008.

 

This would then further make the HP default inaccurate as they have included charges that were from another agreement.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also missed payments on the Hp leading up to the default.

 

I asked the question regarding the charges as i do not see how they can be added along with Late Payment Interest to the HP side of the agreement when it was the loan payments been missed.

 

I only missed payments on the car from Feb until May this year, 4 payments in total but they have been adding charges and interest since i stopped making payments on the insurance back in Sept 2008.

 

This would then further make the HP default inaccurate as they have included charges that were from another agreement.

Absolutely agree! I'd add that to your defence.

Edited by wannabedebtfreesoon
WTF???
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Creditor failed to agree to settle out of court so due in court this Tuesday!

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

 

Got to court today and found they had not turned up. Was informed by the DJ that they had received a letter from their solicitors informing them that after reviewing my defence they had applied for an allocation hearing.

 

Not reading to much into it at this moment but what it seems to suggest to me is they have read the defence and were not confident of defending in court today otherwise they would have been there to do so would they not?

 

Thanks

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

How ridiculous!! WTF do they want to do with an allocation hearing??! A result of that would be an allocation to a track and then a trial. It really doesn't make sense, they had a hearing where they could have obtained a judgement but then decided they wanted a trial with the intention of getting a hearing?? I wouldn't be surprised if you never hear from them again! Seems like a way of discontinuing without having to discontinue, if you see what I mean. They probably want to reserve the right to get everything changed around to the correct figures and then restart the proceedings. If they want to amend their POC they will need to make an application for such.

 

But anyway WELL DONE!!!! You've got them on the run and that can only be a good sign. You've done a sterling job!! :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys really do appreciate all the advice i have been given on here.

 

I did have to chuckle when the DJ told me what was happening. He also went on to say thay most of the the time the claimant rely on the defendant not turning up. Well am sorry to have spoilt their day but i will be there every step.

 

They can change the POC all they want as not one figure adds up to what is on my statement but they will never be able to change the default notice which was incorrect, which also included charges that had been returned and the fact they only gave 13 days for rectification and not 14 as laid down in the CCR1983.

 

We will see what happens next but it is in their own interests to end it now or receive a bigger bill of costs. I will keep you informed along the way.

 

Thanks Guys! :)

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...