Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Benson vs Abbey *** WON ***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6350 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The temp letters can be modified to take account of replies.

Very often things cross in the post because banks leave things to the last minute.

 

You only need to reply imbetween if offers are made.

 

Work out what stage you are at.

If its lba time then send that out you could add a line in there that you will be claiming........ but you have reasons to believe there are more charges and will be claiming these as well, once those figures are in your posession.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They haven't been visited yet - they are due a visit from the IC in September.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good that you confirmed this.......I have been looking for the source,I was of the understanding that a visit had already been made.

It therefore gives more reasons as to why everyone who has been made to wait or not got their statements should complain and add weight to an overdue visit.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Niklowe

When making a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office, what address on the complaints form, should I put for Abbey?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, i have finally recieved a letter back of them.this confirms receipt of my £10 for fee for statements which says they will send me this information but that it does not come under data protection act so they cannot tell me how long it will take.I assume this is delaying tactics again.They recieved my original request letter on 3rd august.So basically they are saying that all this info is stored on microfiche and i will receive these shortly.Shall i just stick to my original time frame.In that sense,when do i send my lba? shall i sit tight and wait for them to send me this info as stated on the letter they have sent or just keep going?

 

I assure you i will be donating to the site at the end of all this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Carry on and see what comes forward.

 

;)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree martin

 

Personally i would respond rejcting thier claim that the data doesnt comply.

 

When you get to court they may try to act innocent by telling you they didnt think their data complied and you accepted it by failing to respond.

 

I am not sure what credence the court would give, but for me if you reject it everyone kows where they stand when you finally submit you court action.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if that is the case then what letter do i send back to them? Plus if i have no records of the charges yet, then how can i fill out the LBA and send it back as some bits are irrelevant as they have sent one years worth of transactions ands the LBA template goes on about how disgusted you are that none of this info has been sent.They have said all this info will be with me shortly.Is it just not worth waiting for these? Or alternatively shall i just call the number that they have advised me to ring with any queries and hassle them over the phone to see when i will get all this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW

 

This is a self help site, so you need to amend any templates you want to send to suit your particualr circumstances as a start point.

 

If you uncertain whether you are saying anything wrong in the letter after youve had a go, post it and people will comment.

 

The key thing you should remeber is that the process you are starting may end up in court. you are starting the process to sue the bank!

 

If you choose not to do something but sit and wait, then it may reflect on your case shold it come to court. if you do not force them to send your data then why should they?

 

If the 40 days passes then imho start legal proceedings. if they dont know you are not accepting thier claims as to the status outside of the data why should they do anything?

 

Ultimately the choice is yours and I am only giving my untrained view.

 

Personally i am trying to conduct my claim in a 'legal way' to reduce the possibility of any delays or aggro for when it gets to court.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

My answer was based on the assumption that the mf arguement letter was sent.(or should I say would be sent)

 

Abbey have started to comply with a lot of requests from people using the temps letters from here.

As previously mentioned recently,there are lots of people trying to claim back charges who have not got the benefit of such temp letters.

Abbeys standard replies therefore should not always be taken at face value.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have received 1.5 years worth of statements from abbey now.I am going to start a claim with the estimates i've got which amounts to £1,491.05 so far.I have however requested that they still send me a list of charges for the last 6 years.I am going to send this letter but i have ammended it a little to let them know this my first claim and once i receive the other info i will be claiming for that.Can someone have a look and let me know if this letter should do the trick or if it will hinder my claim

 

cheers

 

 

Dear Pam Speed

Account no: xxxxxxxxx

Over the past six years, you have charged me for exceeding my credit limit/for visa payments when no money in account and for bill payments for the same reason. It has come to my attention that this is unlawful at common law, and under statute and recent consumer regulations.I shall be filing also for further charges when I am in receipt of further statements I have requested inline with the data protection act detailing charges on my account for the past 6 years, of which I have only received 1.5 years worth

In the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account, it is implied that you will conduct yourselves in a manner which complies with UK law.

I require full repayment of these charges, which I calculate at £1,491.05. I also ask you to remove any default notices on my credit record that are related to these charges. A correction or amendment to the entries are not acceptable.

If you do not comply fully within 14 days, I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount, plus interest and costs, plus a claim under ss.7 and 13 of the Data Protection Act 1998.

Furthermore, I shall submit to the OFT a complaint under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 upon the basis that you have failed to comply with their direction of 5 April 2006 and are therefore not 'fit and proper' to hold a consumer credit licence under the 1974 Act.

Yours faithfully

William Benson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys and girls.Seriously need some advice now.Sent off my lba asking for 1,500 back and all i got was a leaflet advising me how to complain to Abbey.What now? send another lba advising them they have however many days left of the 14 to refund my money or just start court proceedings now? and if so, is there a thread on here showing how i go about this.

 

HELP!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully you have followed the advice here with regards to timings generally in respect of prelim letters?

 

Assuming you have then it seems a standard response, you write to abbey say give it back, they send you a helpful leaflet.

 

At least thats what they did to me when i sent the pre lim in.

 

Dont worry stick to your timetable. if they dont respond then after 14 days submit your claim.

 

If you fgeel generous you could wrtie to them at 7 days and say you have 7 left if you want.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

Do you know if you can claim back charges on a credit card account that you have already closed?thks

 

You can claim it back, theyve taken moeny illegaly and your asking for it back.

 

All the accounts im chasing are closed

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again.Its now coming up to 14 days and charges have not been refunded.I know i should now start my claim through the courts but am a bit unsure of how this process works.Can anyone help.I cannot find the templates or the section i should go to.

 

any help would be most appreciated.also it is almost past the 40 day deadline for the microfiche thingy.what course of action if any should i take to get the rest of the information (i have info for last 18 months which is what i am usuing to file my claim.

 

thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again.Its now coming up to 14 days and charges have not been refunded.I know i should now start my claim through the courts but am a bit unsure of how this process works.Can anyone help.I cannot find the templates or the section i should go to.

 

any help would be most appreciated.also it is almost past the 40 day deadline for the microfiche thingy.what course of action if any should i take to get the rest of the information (i have info for last 18 months which is what i am usuing to file my claim.

 

thanks in advance

 

Will, check your PM

 

Janey

Do you have a website? Add the following code to add a link to The Consumer Action Group:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk

The Consumer Action Group

Reclaim your rights as a consumer and reclaim your unfair bank charges! Free site with letter templates and helpful forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right i'm filling out the money claim bit and was goingto put this down

 

 

 

I have a contract with the defendant since

2001 conducted on their standard terms and

conditions.I claim return of money taken by

the defendant in charges over the last

6years plus interest levied on those

charges. The charges are a disproportionate

penaltyand thus unenforceable as they are

contrary to common law. Also as a

disisproportionate penalty they are invalid

under the Unfair(Contracts) Terms Act 1977

s.4 and the Unfair Terms in Consumer

Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8,sch.2(1)

(e). In the event that the charges are not

a penalty then they are unreasonable within

the meaning of the Supply of Goods and

Services Act 1982 s.15. I have asked the

bank to justify their charges but they

declined. I claim a sum equivalent to the

total amount unlawfully debited since

01/02/05:£1,491.05.I also claim £119.28

interest under s.69 of the County Courts

Act 1984 at 8% a year from 01/02/05 to

30/08/06 and interest at the same rate up

to the date of judgment or earlier payment

at a rate of 23.6p/day.

 

 

is there any of this i can lose as it is too many lines and does this look ok? Also,i'm being thick,but when you are on the partucluars of claim section and it says sign (initials and surname) do you just type that in on your pc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claimant has an accountXXXXXX with

the defendant since XXXX until the

present date.Between XXXX and XXXXX

the defendant made various deductions from

the account in respect of unauthorised

overdraft fees and 'returned payment' fees

If the defendant is able to establish that

the contract between the claimant and the

defendant did contain terms purporting to

entitle the defendant to levy these

charges, the claimant will contend that

they are unenforceable at common law, being

penalty clauses rather than being

liquidated damages clauses. The claimant

claims from the defendant a sum equivalent

to the total amount unlawfully debited to

the claimant?s account during the above

mentioned period, being £XXXXX The

claimant further claims interest pursuant

to s69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the

rate of 8%pa, being the sum of £XXXX and

interest at the same rate up to the date of

judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate

of 0.00022%. Plus the court fee.

 

 

There you go, it fits, just fill in the blanks

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...