To be accurate, Reds, we are a self-help and self-empowerment site. If people try to do their own research on threads here, even if they don't understand everything they gain a better understanding and we can correct any issues. Without people doing this, going to court against a PPC or anyone else is a very challenging experience and cases can be lost because the OP didn't grasp the underlying principles. We can't be at the hearing with you. HB

Having a quick look on street view it seems like Max stay is 3 hours between 06:00-00:00 and 00:00-06:00 is 1 hour. This was as of August 2018 but I can't imagine them clamping it down that much considering there's 2 supermarkets in the area as well as the restaurants. Who can do their shopping in 45 minutes?

Reds, We've all got lives to lead. This is exactly what the fleecers rely on... all their victims are subjected to "life". If you are not going to completely fall on your face in the courtroom, you MUST self educate! We can't be there with you because... "We've all got lives to lead". If you really want to throw the towel in, PE might well offer a "discount" to settle in the not too distant future. (Other more experienced team / users will probably know their normal MO)... I haven't got the time to check historical threads, because I've go a life to lead

Not really thought like that... It's a shame we have no idea of how many "browsers" just take the info here, run with it themselves and get a successful outcome. There certainly must be some...

its just a tool in my toolbox. if it has the desired effect i'll use it. people sometimes forget our posts are not just regarding their situation personally at that time.. 10'000 of people read and will read our threads without ever becoming a member and need to understand how important it is to actually do certain things. we don't, and have never operated, like some other consumer forums or websites, whereby 90% of the information is templated and scripted and not 'alive'. we personally take the trouble to live type every post with relevant and directed advice.....thats takes a very special and dedicated team of individuals wh

The amount outstanding can not be more than the original judgment ....given the age of the judgment I suspect Lowell are not aware that the debt is subject to a CCJ and given its age its over 6 years old therefore any enforcement action would be difficult. Ignore Lowell if you wish unless you want to settle the original judgment amount..but there is little they can do. .

nope you ignore it. wait until mcol claim history shows dq's have been sent out. good you should be able to eat them for breakfast easily then, just dont let any more silly mistakes or slipups occur that they could exploit, as they will do so. there's nothing more intuitive than reading a good 20+ pcn claimform threads,it get you used to what's actually next in the process and what comes after that and how to or not react. dx

Very good move to contact the retail park owners. However, you're right that you should have done it while this was a simple PCN, now that there is a claim form you can be sure the fleecers will fight like hell to not cancel, because the poor dears have shelved out the enormous sum of £35 to start the claim. Have a look at the last couple of pages of Reapstar's thread at Goodmayes Hospital. Good move though.

Tats smart ! It’s the evening time . Best I peak in on one of the days to get the details right.

So confirmed, no DQ has been sent by the court. PE are trying one of their slimy, "frightening" tactics. Ignore the rubbish they've sent. Wait for the real DQ from the court.

thanks for that @Nicky Boy . I have been to the courts before and I know what it takes .

thanks @dx100uk its been sent by the Parkingeye Enforcemnt team and not the courts . I really wish I had the luxury to sit and read the website and look up for information than sit and ask advice . I feel many people here are quick to judge others . I have to say am struggling with time ,family and many others issues . PLEASE DO NOT JUDGE OTHERS ! If one can advise its good . If you cant that's fine! I have been quite and polite on many occasions . But I have say this attitude is totally not required especially on a forum like this meant to help people.

I now have confirmation in writing from the three deposit schemes that our deposit was never held by any of them.

You inform the court and they will be barred from using written evidence or possibly have their claim struck out for not complying with the courts directions. As we all do but we give our time free also along with contending with above.

It can, the claimants simply requests permission of the court pursuant to CPR 38.7 https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part38#38.7 Although very rare it ever happens. Andy

Once again @Princess999 your best hope of dealing with this person is to start a new thread and you tell your story and to make everything as public as possible.. You just in your interests, the interest of others and the interests of the animals involved

Hi Princess999 I am happy to chat with you, no harm in that. If it helps get this breeder. I am not sure how we make that contact or if my email is allowed up here xxxxxxx i agree we should be ousting her on this site but I would rather chat to you privately than not at all if you fear her but you should not let her. I just had covid and pneumonia so I am behind on my case but starting again today. Please do not be scared- she targets targets pups not peeps. Message me if you prefer but I encourage you to oust here too. Maybe a chat mite help you with that but I will do what I can. regards lesle

Thank you for posting the PCN. The good news is that both you and your Mother are off the hook. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms act 2012 so the charge CANNOT be transferred from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now responsible for the charge and as several thousand people with valid motor insurance policies are allowed to drive that car, good luck knowing who to pursue. In order to be able to transfer the debt from the driver to the keeper PE must observe the wording of the Act. And they haven't. Schedule 4 S9 [2][e] states " (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver a

"The only reason we have your data is because we bought a debt from another company and as such due to our greed, we put you at risk..." They should write this off as a matter of course. You should raise a formal complaint about it

I'm unsure what more I need to disclose though and I'm not relying on witness statements because this isn't a murder trial...