sorry forgot to attach. Jax N1 statement cag.pdf

Thank you - that was helpful. Thank you. I have not deleted the chronology but now the section previously called the Cause of Action has been implemented into the document. Should I delete the chronology. numbers 3 & 6 have bullet points relating to the topic within that number. Is that ok or should I give the bullet points there own number. I basically tried to loosely structure them under her licensing breaches then the Sales Of Goods Act breaches. Appreciated.

Should I number every single paragraph or just the section dealing with the sequence of chronological events ?

Sorry. I will do the ODF. Version next time.

Thank you. I have tried again. Please re assess the document. I have all receipts for the costs made and prognosis reports. I have also included the cost of another pet as a resolution of the judges opinion goes that way. When I called the courts for advice about claiming for his surgery although I had not yet paid for it, they said simply ask the judge what you want to but it has to be asked now, in the N1 form. I have now included it. The surgery is cheaper than his care without surgery and he has a right to live pain free - the judge may see that. I lose nothing by asking. Jax N1 statement copy.docxJax N1 statement copy.docxJax N1 statement copy.docxJax N1 statement copy.docxJax N1 statement copy.docxJax N1 statement copy.docxJax N1 statement copy.docxJax N1 statement copy.docxJax N1 statement copy.docxJax N1 statement copy.docx

I am aware of the courts potential decisions. My main aim is to recoup my losses. If and when the animal begins to suffer, I will make the necessary decisions then and no one will dictate when I should be doing so. I did not buy a dog for 'cute looks' that cause them pain like a pug etc. I purchased a normal spaniel for temperament and nature. This forum is priceless and I appreciate the help. The required surgery is a full fix and cheaper than maintaining him without it given the meds he will need. A comment about other dogs not being good enough is not necessary. My claim is about this dog. I have spent a lot of money on this dog, merely finding out what is wrong as it was not declared by the breeder in full. I am able to talk and deal with Judges, solicitors or anyone else I need to, at what ever level - I can communicate without issues orally. Its written work and structuring that I struggle with. Please can you explain where and how I can improve the document. What is a cause of action please? Do I need to delete anything or am I adding the cause of action to the document as it stands. When my previous copy highlighted how the breeder breached her obligations, you said those issues were not recoverable so not necessary. I explained their presence by showing how it goes to showing her character, professionalism and attitudes to her obligations. Exactly what do I need to do to make this document correct please and where do I place it. I am not being made aware of exactly what is missing or what needs to be removed etc. Lesley

Is the following version any better please. IJax N1 statement copy.docxJax N1 statement copy.docxJax N1 statement copy.docxJax N1 statement copy.docxt has been done as a word doc until i perfect it.

Sir please try and remember and appreciate my cognitive issues. I am trying! That remark offers no feedback to what errors I have made or address my question of what goes in each numbered paragraph? Does each numbered paragraph represent a new ‘event’ in the series of events between myself and the breeder and vet visits? Am I telling the story - minus the emotion with a numbered paragraph each time something new cropped up ? So a numbered paragraph per engagement wether that be with vets or the breeder? Was the second version still no good ?

Hi. I posted another version at approx 14.40. It was more succinct and less emotional. however paragraphs were not numbered. We’d each numbered paragraph represent each day I took the dog to the vets ? I answered your question that I had informed the RSPCA.

Apologies for the last message. new phone - predictive text. Is the last version of the N1 now ok to send. if so what next. if not how do I improve it please. Lesley

Hi. mess the last version of the N1 access table to start the process now? mid not how do I improve it. mic si, what next please. Lesley

/assets/static/govuk-opengraph-image-dade2dad5775023b0568381c4c074b86318194edb36d3d68df721eea7deeac4b.png Dog breeding licensing: statutory guidance for local authorities - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK

Hi Ok I take your comments on board but before I amend the form, Id like to clarify. As I mentioned previously, I have cognitive issues which impacts my ability to structure and you comment of me handing the breeder the win on a plate due to disorganised structure so I just want to be sure what I am doing. The reason I mentioned things like not seeing the pup with its mom, lack of socialisation, lack of ensuring the pup is accustomed to a domestic setting go towards showing the attitudes of the breeder to her licensing rules hence going to show her true character. When I reported her to her LA, those were the first questions they asked me as they are strict obligations that form part of her licensing regs. I know these things are not recoverable but if she fails to follow her basic statutory obligations, she is misleading purchasers. Do you still think it should be removed when it contributes to showing character? Yes I have the receipts, reports etc from Vets - Should I break the vet bill amount down to what dates i spent what instead of the total as a whole? I can substantiate the fact she has reasonable knowledge when they are forced to disclose documents. The court can enforce that right? Point taken on the LiP costs being removed for a small claim. I will attempt to remove the emotion reduce it and make the amendments you have suggested but I just wanted to clarify if I really should be removing facts that show she's breaching licensing conditions. I thought it would be important to show her low level of professionalism because if she cannot honour basic rules of her license, what can she honour? Yes, multiple agencies have been contacted and I believe I have set the wheels of motion turning with these organisations. I have yet to contact the police. She is now selling several puppies online as I had contacted Freeads about allowing a puppy farmer to advertise sick animals - as she is now online, I can only presume she cannot advertise with them at the moment whilst they investigate.

I guess that’s what I am asking really. I am confused by this particulars of claim. is what is on the form enough as a PoC or would I have to send the document I posted a few weeks ago that was king and detailed at a later date. Just the N1 ? I called the courts who said that if you work a case yourself you can total the hours spent and charge £19.00 per hour. This is confirmed by the Court wingman book of How to manage your own litigation. it’s a hard copy book so I cannot upload a link for a ref. regards lesley

Hi, I have now followed the above PoC link which took me to a N1 form. I have attached it but each time I open it the text vanishes. I can upload a word version if this happens on this site. Is this my PoC, is it good to go now please. I have had covid and subsequent pneuomonia so apologies for the delay in uploading the doc N1 JAX cag version.pdf Jax JUDICIAL REMEDY.pdf