Jump to content


Question of LBA/N1 etiquette


fivelaws
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6559 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have arrived at the moment of sending my first Letter Before Action, but I have a question of etiquette for your considered opinion;

 

My company used to use a professional firm of debt collectors (and very good they were to). When it came to the letter before action, they recommended including a draft of the N1 claim form and to state in the letter that this was to indicate your intention to pursue a claim only if it became necessary because an agreement couldn't be reached.

 

They did say that it was important to refer to this in the letter as a "last course of action, if we can't come to a conclusion" otherwise the courts get huffy about you using their name as a big stick.

 

I want to be harsh but fair and quite like the idea of doing this, but what is the consensus?

A&L: Settled - £6,200

HFC: Settled - £800

Shell Visa: Settled - £250

Egg: Settled - £700

Mint: Settled - £1200

RBS: Settled - £850

 

The opionions in this post are guaranteed to conform to the laws of physics, but pretty much nothing else...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have arrived at the moment of sending my first Letter Before Action, but I have a question of etiquette for your considered opinion;

 

My company used to use a professional firm of debt collectors (and very good they were to). When it came to the letter before action, they recommended including a draft of the N1 claim form and to state in the letter that this was to indicate your intention to pursue a claim only if it became necessary because an agreement couldn't be reached.

 

They did say that it was important to refer to this in the letter as a "last course of action, if we can't come to a conclusion" otherwise the courts get huffy about you using their name as a big stick.

 

I want to be harsh but fair and quite like the idea of doing this, but what is the consensus?

 

I may be wrong, but I have a feeling that this practice has now been outlawed - although this may only relate to consumer debts. I certainly wouldn't bother - it will make no difference to the bank.

Alan, Derby, UK.

 

 

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

 

Sorry, but I cannot deal with your case by PM - please ask questions in your own thread. If you do not get a reply within 48 hours send a PM, with a link to the relevant thread, to any Site Team Member.

 

DO NOT SEND QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR CLAIM TO ADMIN, or our WEBMASTER - YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE A REPLY.

 

Advice given is purely my opinion, and is not based on any legal training.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...