Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Leeds Mercantile Court Hearing 28th June 2007


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6186 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 224
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

When i was @ leeds before...I got my cheque 2hrs before the court time! Last minute or what!!

Jenny

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a reminder:

 

1. Any newcomers to this thread and the 28th hearing, look at Post 1 for info and guidance on the Mercantile Court and CMI sheet etc..

 

2. If your case does not get settled before the day of the hearing and you therefore have to attend the hearing, don't forget the 'Wasted Costs Order'- see Bankfodder's thread on this Mercantile forum http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mercantile-court-cases-stays/85750-haved-youhad-your-time.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Query please.

 

I have posted this on my own thread but wondered if someone on here had some answers.

 

On the CMI Sheet, at Statement of Case point 5, can I use the words "The claimants would request the Court to order disclosure and breakdown of the administrative cos incurred by the defendant in applying the said charges to the claimants' account, as per CPR Part 18"

 

And at Disclosure point 9, can I say "Yes, as per CPR Part 31"?

 

Not being used to these legal forms I'm somewhat confused and would appreciate someone clarifying what I can and cannot do. I'd like to get the form back asap as I also have to send it to Abbey.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rob,

 

Your answer at item 5 looks OK. You need not really say 'as per CPR 18' at the end of the sentence. The question already mentions CPR 18 'further information'. Similarly at item 9, the question there is already under the CPR 31 Disclosure heading. Whether you refer to the CPR or not in your answer is not really a problem.

 

(If you have not already done so, you might like to look at the sticky thread 'Mercantile Court Guide' http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mercantile-court-cases-stays/34297-mercantile-court-guide.html at the top of this forum. See post 3.

 

PS 7/6/07: See the new sticky thread Case Management Info Sheet

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a note on my court letter, quote;

 

This case may be released to another Judge, possibly at a different court

 

Is this a standard paragraph and nothing to worry about.

 

I think that's standard - I had that on mine & it didn't change. If it's listed for HH Judge Kaye at Leeds it's highly unlikely he won't hear it himself as he's very keen for a test case to set precedent as opposed to the banks misguidedly relying on the recent judgements of District judges.

 

Zsazsa

HSBC S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 24.08.06

HSBC WON £3608.05 inc court costs DONATION MADE

 

Halifax S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 24.08.06

Halifax WON £1909.39 inc court costs DONATION MADE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just finished my CMI and will take it to the Court tomorrow or Friday. I'll also post a copy to First Direct (the scoundrels). I added costs in at No 35. based exactly on Jenny's 25 hours, I've probably spent over 25 hours on it so far but how on earth do I prove it? Should I file some kind of form to claim this or is just the mention on the CMI sufficient to get me this extra cash back too?

 

I'm a tad confused. If the banks are settling prior to the Court hearings, then exactly how is the settlement sum arrived at?

 

Is it

 

  1. What they owe plus original court filing costs, plus interest at 8% accrued daily from charge date?
  2. Just what they owe.
  3. No. 1 above plus extra charges (£231.25) - as per answer No. 35 in the Costs section of the CMI sheet

...and how exactly do they work out the interest or does the court do it, no that can't be right as it won't have made it to court. I'm chasing my tail. Help...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, 25 is an rough figure, I claimed 30 back from barclays. This is for the litigate in person costs see....

Home - Ministry of Justice

If you think more put in more but remember they're less likely to challenge a lower figure. In Bankfodders thread...

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mercantile-court-cases-stays/34289-barclays-settling-these-claim.html

He guides us to use 25 - 30.

There is an interest calculator....

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/chargeinterest.php

 

 

Hope that helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jenny,

 

I was being far more literal and probably stupid. I have already asked for interest at 8% per day on each cost from date it was charged on my original court claim. I was wondering how it works if the banks pay you out before the hearing. Do you agree a sum with them or do they offer you money minus the costs and interest to test your resolve?

 

Sorry to be a fool but I've only ever had correspondence from the bank never a phone call and the prospect of court is very daunting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi...You're not a fool;)

When the lit team rang me to settle, they were throwing offers so quickly.

They offered very little then i finally settled for the full amount + interest @ 7% + court costs and my lit in person costs.

It really comes down to bartering!! Stick to your guns and you'll get full settlement...you'll feel so good afterwards!!

Jenny

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mothership99 - Don't be daunted - honest! Judge Kaye is cool & he's doing the Leeds Mercantile in June - if it got that far & it doesn't sound like it will, all the court staff are really, really helpful, not to mention that there'll be loads of peeps doing just the same as you are & you're all in it together.

 

You will feel so empowered regardless of the money anyway it's definately a good day out! Unless of course you're me!!

 

You'll be ok so don't worry & good luck!

 

Zsazsa

HSBC S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 24.08.06

HSBC WON £3608.05 inc court costs DONATION MADE

 

Halifax S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 24.08.06

Halifax WON £1909.39 inc court costs DONATION MADE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Curiously, my OH who has taken action against Halifex, has received notification of CMC.

Curious because she received Judgement by default on 13th March! They did not submit a defence.

We are not aware that Halifex have applied for set aside. If they have, surely Court would have informed us by now?

We have written to court seeking clarification.

Link to post
Share on other sites

im filling in my CMI for leeds 28th and i am having my partner represent me as i am on holiday on that day. the court already advised me this was ok so when asked on the form PARTIES 3. Do you intend to add any further party? do i mention his name here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Purple.silk,

 

Look at post 15 on the new sticky thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mercantile-court-cases-stays/96212-case-management-info-sheet.html

You are still the one and only party actually making the claim so the answer at 3 is 'No'.

You might also like to consider items 13, 14, 15 (for the trial not the hearing) if you intend having a representative at the trial, not that there is much chance of the case proceeding that far. See the notes at Post 15 on the above thread.

 

When you send your CMI sheet to the Court, I suggest you enclose it under cover of a letter, also confirming your conversation with the Court and their agreement that you can send a representative to the hearing in place of you - give your partner's name and address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello all right the date is gettin nearer so am getting it all together just got a few questions

 

1:

we havent received the banks defence from court or heard anything from them or scm as regards the claim should i ring the court and ask for a copy ?

 

2:

i dont know the address of their lawyers is it the same SCM at cardiff or brighton as we have had two letters about moneys owed to LLoyds from this firm at these different addresses who do i send their copy of CMI sheet to ?!

 

3:

As its a directions hearing do we just bring our court bundle including terms and conditions, or add all the stuff that garys thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/82148-got-court-date-important.html

includes ?

 

any help would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi donbracho,

 

SC & M seem above responding to claimants! I received a letter the afternoon before due in court offering partial settlement then I went into an 11th hour panic! see http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mercantile-court-cases-stays/85142-zsazsas-mum-lloyds-mercantile.html

 

As the full amount hadn't been paid I still attended - this is VERY important otherwise you risk your case being dismissed & costs against you if you don't turn up.

 

You won't need the full bundle for the CMC - but you do need to complete a CMI sheet & sent that to the court & a copy to SC & M before the hearing (7days prior at latest I think) plus it's a good idea to include another schedule of charges with the CMI sheet at this stage too. Send these to the SC & M address in Brighton, (address on my thread somewhere I think if you haven't got it.) I took all the correspondence I'd had to date with LTSB & SC & M plus another couple of copies of the schedule of charges, which as it happened came in useful as I had them to hand to give to the judge - remember your claim gets 8% interest a day so the amounts change slightly. Take a notepad to make notes as well - there'll be lots of info given by HH Judge Kaye QC.

 

It's highly unlikely SC & M will send anyone, and if they do they're likely to have 'no instruction' except a request to transfer to the small claims track which will be denied. That also means you'll likely not get any settlement on the day either.

 

Hope this helps but shout if you want any more info, I'm not an expert but if I can help through my own experiences I'm glad to. PLUS - the court staff are help & friendliness personified - minor errors will be overcome as this Judge is gagging for a test case!

 

Good Luck!

 

Zsazsa

  • Haha 1

HSBC S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 24.08.06

HSBC WON £3608.05 inc court costs DONATION MADE

 

Halifax S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 24.08.06

Halifax WON £1909.39 inc court costs DONATION MADE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...