Jump to content


Change of tactics by HSBC - amend prelim. letter? Advice please!!


ladybird17
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6319 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Last year, HSBC informed customers that unauthorised overdrafts would now be called "informal" (or something similar). If you hop over your limit, they immediately send you a letter thanking you for your request for this informal OD (regardless of whether you've requested it or not) and the "arrangement fee" will be £25. Now obviously, this is a penalty dressed up as something else, but the prelim. letter will rebound back immediately as they will say it's a fee for a service. Any ideas on slightly changing the wording in the prelim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

as they will say it's a fee for a service. Any ideas on slightly changing the wording in the prelim?

 

I personally don’t think we need to.

We are arguing all of the fees we are claiming back are unjust and illegal because they are so high and do not represent what it actually costs the bank to provide these services.

I don’t see that it matters what they call a fee, if it doesn’t fairly represent the actual cost to the bank its still unjust and illegal.

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an aside, they're unjust and unlawful - not illegal... I know it's pedantics, but we must never get into the habit of calling these charges illegal. They are unlawful.

 

However, I agree entirely that they look like old charges dressed up in new clothes...

Dave

____________________________________________________

HSBC: Settled - Offered full refund 2 days before MCOL - £2934.50

(Thread here)

Lloyds TSB: Settled - Offered full refund 2 weeks before MCOL - £650 (Thread here)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think changing the prelim is unnecessary because if they wish to go on the route of service then what is it that is being given to you to charge you. It is unlawful and service charge has to benefit both parties. SO does £25 really benefit you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...