SAR distress claim against Parking Eye

[dx100uk]

As for the sar 30 days fail simply write and give them 14 days to comply else you will complain to the ico without further notification

 

Dx

[dx100uk]

extension?

 

[dx100uk]

you either need to decide if you complain to the ICO or goto court.

ideally you should not be issuing a letter of claim before you involve the ICO...IMHO.

as the authority that can enforce sar non compliance wont ever know about the court claim good or bad.

its important to always involve the regulators FIRST. then they have a record of the firms compliance failure. the more they get, the more likely they will act against them. 

a fine for non compliance by the ICO is FAR FAR more damaging to them than a court claim.

dx

[dx100uk]

there is no mention of DQ N180 entries?

is that the FULL Claim History?

and are you SURE SURE SURE its the RIGHT CLAIM NUMBER FOR THE DQ YOU SENT CHECK THEY MATCH.

[dx100uk]

On 11/10/2023 at 00:42, Reapstar said:

Case Stay Lifted on 08/09/2023

DQ sent to you on 08/09/2023

DQ filed by claimant on 08/09/2023

which means you did file a defence.

so either you recent updates ARE NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS CLAIM.

or the above quote of a post from 10/2023 is not this claim....

 

which is it. 

i think you need to scan up unredacted the claimform for the claim number listed on this dq refusal and we can check they are the same claim....

i think not.

dx

[dx100uk]

right post moved to the correct SAR Claim thread.

PDF sorted and back up

what you have done is filed a DQ stating you wish to DEFEND A CLAIM when YOU ARE THE CLAIMANT!!

you need to send them a CORRECTLY FILLED IN  DQ N180...

dx

 

[dx100uk]

you are not resending as the sent one WAS WRONGLY FILLED OUT.

send out to the court and the defendants sols a correctly filled out N180 as the CLAIMANT.

see what happens.