Jump to content


Link/Kearns Letter of Claim - HBOS Credit Card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 452 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

why did you tip them off?

 

that is not what is recommended.....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no we are anon as are you.

but you should have held the CCA till sending of the LOC reply.

failure to abide by the 14+2 working days means nothing toward CCA compliance going fwd.

you really do need to read up.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they dont have have to abide by 14 working days, i will send out the LOC tomorrow.

 

This is from the link you gave me earliar.

 

"staple the £1  PO to the CCA request and send it to the debt purchaser

return our completed PAP form below to the solicitors that sent it to you

attain free proof of posting for BOTH at any PO counter

1st class mail will do. recorded is a waste of money"

 

so will send pap form tomorrow..

Edited by cenk102
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 04/11/2022 at 21:22, dx100uk said:

dont rush, run the 30days close

dx

 

15 hours ago, cenk102 said:

So they dont have have to abide by 14 working days

nope where does it say they must?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why? That's only relevant if you were paying, as it renders things unenforceable till they do, but as you are not....

 

You really should be reading letter of claim threads , link debt threads and also stop just reading one post in a thread, not just post 2. 

 

Dx

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In hindsight i should have let them take me to court and then request documents.

 

I dont understand why link are taking ppl on low income to court at present. Just received email from energy supplier, currently my energy bills are like 25% of my wage.

 

My expenses are more than my earnings.

 

1 hour ago, dx100uk said:

Why? That's only relevant if you were paying, as it renders things unenforceable till they do, but as you are not....

 

You really should be reading letter of claim threads , link debt threads and also stop just reading one post in a thread, not just post 2. 

 

Dx

Its happened, i will delay the pap form till end of month.

 

Thanks for your help you can tell im an amateur..😀

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey no sweat

The more you read the stronger we become.

 

Dx

 

14 hours ago, cenk102 said:

In hindsight i should have let them take me to court and then request documents.

No. That's why the pre action protocol exists. 

 

If you want help with debts start a thread in the debt self help forum.

 

Dx

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Update

 

Just when i was ready for legal action Kearns have written and said they have sent file back to Link Financial. So im guessing not taking me court yet..

 

Still dont understand in the current cost of living crisis they want to take people on low income to court. Take me im self employed, on low income and receive benefits. I dont own a home so the odds are against them.

 

Im tainted with bankrupcy scar for eternity as im on gazette online, having ccj doesnt really compare.

 

Offering them £1 or £2 is pointless as it will never pay off debt and will be in this situation till the day i die.

 

Link can only threathen me with ccj and bailiffs but if i dont have any gagets worth anywhere near £10k then what use is bailiff.

 

We are in a long recession i hope all dcas go bust. The law needs to change either original creditors sells the debt or write it off in tax losses, they shouldnt be allowed to do both. 

 

Anyway DX thanks for helping me fill the letter of claims form. It has delayed court action, in mean time will continue to read up on court claims..👍

Edited by cenk102
Link to post
Share on other sites

that doesn't mean the end of it.

 

bailiffs can ONLY ever be appointed by a COURT if ASKED FOR and if you've ALREADY lost a court judgement.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doubt it and even if they do, most stuff from Kearns/link usually has some form of fakery involved 

 

Get reading like threads, then everything is answered. 

 

Dx

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well just received cca response, 

 

"Unfortunately, the original creditor has confirmed that they are currently unable to comply with your request within the 12 day initial timeframe"

 

So they will comply, so a reconstituted cca coming up?

Edited by cenk102
Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean a fake made from stuff out of their filing cabinet with your name inserted on to it. not ever from the original creditor an the one you actually filled in....:pound:

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it must come from HBOS.

 

however, there is no way to know for sure where it comes from, 99% of dca's fake paperwork just look in some claimform threads.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

but who says any of it is enforceable?

 

you seriously need to go read threads here.

 

no more nurse maiding.

 

 

On 29/11/2022 at 13:08, cenk102 said:

and i do sar and hbos doesnt have reconstituted cca,

an sar does not have to include a copy of the agreement.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, cenk102 said:

Who can make reconstituted cca, the original lender or the new owner? The legal owner of the debt (Link)

 

Can link make up reconstituted cca? Yes

 

Rephrase question, can link create a reconstituted cca or can hbos only do it? See above HBOS are not now the legal owner

 

 

Andy

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andyorch

 

What i need to know is what needs to be on cca, do updated terms of the credit agreement need to be included as i can recall few time receiving letters stating change terms and conditions.

 

Also credit limits, do changes need to be included.

 

Obviously trying to look for loophole so i dont need to go for a DRO

 

With my current situation a ccj is same as a DRO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You won't get a ccj if defended properly and you most certainly should never do a dro/iva/bk over consumer credit debts 

 

Dx

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The preliminary issues determined by the judge in the case of Carey were:

 

Issue 1

When providing a copy of an executed agreement in response to a request under section 78(1) of the Act:

a.     must a creditor provide a photocopy (or other form of complete copy) of the original agreement that was signed by the debtor or at least provide a copy which is derived directly from the original agreement or complete copy thereof? or

b.     can a creditor provide a document which is a reconstitution of the original agreement which may be from sources other than the actual signed agreement itself?

 

It was held that a creditor can satisfy its duty under section 78 by providing a reconstituted version of the executed agreement which may be from sources other than the actual signed agreement itself.

The judge accepted that as a matter of law, section 78 does not itself require any particular explanation as to how the copy was made. However, as a matter of good practice and so as not to mislead the debtor, it is desirable that the creditor should explain that it is providing a reconstituted as opposed to a physical copy of the executed agreement. This will also explain why the copy might otherwise look a little odd. The creditor can also explain in the letter that this procedure is satisfactory under the Act.

 

The judge also provided that the following information needs to be included in the reconstituted copy agreement (assuming of course that it was present in the original):

1.     Heading: Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974

2.     Name and address of the debtor

3.     Name and address of the creditor

4.     Cancellation clause applicable to the executed agreement.

 

All of the above may be provided on a sheet which is separate from the full statement of terms and conditions which also forms part of the reconstituted agreement. The creditor may, however, decide to reconstitute the agreement in a different way so that, for example, the information above is populated electronically onto the same sheet as that which sets out the terms and conditions, or some of them. The judge stated that he did not intend to prescribe the precise form of the reconstituted agreement. The key point is what information it should contain, subject to the point that its format should not be such as to mislead the debtor as to what he agreed to.

 

 

Must a creditor provide a document which would comply (if signed) with the requirements of the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (Regulations) as to form, as at the date the agreement was made in order to comply with section 78?

 

A creditor need not, in complying with section 78, provide a document which would comply (if signed) with the requirements of the Regulations as to form, as at the date the agreement was made.

 

Must the copy provided under section 78 include the debtor's name and address as at the date when the agreement was made, and if so in what form?

 

The section 78 copy must contain the name and address of the debtor as it was at the time of the execution of the agreement. But the creditor can provide the name and address from whatever source it has of those details. It does not have to take them from the executed agreement itself.

 

 

Issue 2

 

If an agreement has been varied by the creditor under a unilateral power of variation, is a copy of the executed agreement as varied, a sufficient copy for the purposes of section 78(1), or must the creditor provide a copy of the original agreement as well?

 

If an agreement has been varied by the creditor under a unilateral power of variation, the creditor must still provide a copy of the original agreement, as well as the varied terms.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I will have an crack at defending this, no doubt.

 

Having a CCJ is the same as DRO for me, it doesnt effect my way of life and it also stops me getting credit in future. Ive sat down with the other half and both agreed no more credit in future no matter what.

 

Andy said Link can create reconstituted CCA so why are Link awaiting an update from BOS if they can reconstitute document themselves?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...