Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

TFL SJPN - accidently tried to use wrong pass


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 605 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

so they did not reply to your begging letter for OOC?

bit strange as this was obviously a one off mistake.

 

can we have some dates please..

 

you can use email the email AD is on the very 1st letter from TfL.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should not have left it so long from 14th july to recontact them.

 

as the thread you mention in post 1 is good 

 

and 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

plead guilty

state you want to come to court. (your ultimate aim is to show remorse directly to the judge and of course if OOC has not been reached on the day, try a personal approach to the TfL prosecutions team there and then before the hearing , make sure you have payment methods with you..)

use the box at 4.2 to further plea too, regardless, and how a one off mistake would ruin your future etc etc).

 

use the threads indicated above and others here (use our enhanced google search box ... grovelling letter or what have you) to construct such a letter (and for want of future readers DONT reply as this OP did!!) GROVEL!!! BEG!! etc etc

 

pop it up here 1st if you wish as TEXT.

 

you have till the 5oct though i'd get an email in ASAP. it might take a couple...NO do NOT ring but certainly make yourself a PEST!!

its very rare for a one off mistake to result in a criminal record and not achieve an OOC

 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's letter is far far far too long 

One side only.

 

Short paragraphs only. 90% of that letter is pointless waffle and totally unnecessary. Will end up in the bin.  And stop quoting their rules  and regs, they know them inside out 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still far too long . 

 

You really only need to say that it was a one off error caused by having multiple passes in the same wallet, something that never would normally ever happen, conjoined with simple forgetfulness. 

 

Apologise for all the inconvenience caused to tfl staff, offer to pay any unpaid fare and admin fees wishing to seek settlement that out of court.

 

Also pointout you already have existing card(s) and will continue to ensure the use of the right card going forwards since the day of your fatal mistake .

 

End again by apologising.

 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but you don't need to include all that twaddle . Your dyslexia is not an excuse and should not be mentioned 

 

Follow the example ideas I gave above to Inc and like threads.

 

You are seriously over complicating what should be a simple almost blunt letter.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have not offered nor invited you to offer redress...why do you keep saying that?

needs work and rearranging.

 

stop being so formal, normal joe blog english.

 

i write in relation to my 1st letter dated xxxxxx

 

On the day in question, my actions were a one off error caused by mistakenly having multiple passes in the same wallet, something that would never would normally happen, conjoined with simple forgetfulness. i touched my wallet, it picked up a pass i was merely carry to hand on, and not my own, my actions were not a deliberate attempt to defraud TfL.

 

something like the above, short to the point and sweet. the MAIN point of your letter is to point out it was a natural HUMAN MISTAKE.

 

then apologise etc state it cant/wont happen again (use my sentence. from above)

 

I am happy to reach a settlement outside of court and compensate you for your troubles by paying any unpaid fares, fines and any administration charges to save pocket from court costs and alleviate the financial stress.

 

please DONT use the above, it's rude...

 

i wish to request that you consider an out of court settlement in this matter, above all to save court time. i am will to pay any missed fares, administration costs or fines to mutually settle the matter. 

 

A criminal record would destroy my future employment options and impact the whole family financially...

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

made a few changes. i'll make some more later

ditch the green!

 

we need to include a bit about the contents of your 1st letter right at the start as well as its a bit cheeky what you previously insinuated to them (dont teach your grandmother to suck eggs!)

 

more later busy with sheep!! till dark..

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unnecessary waffle 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll look later.

 

I've made one change, but I can't read pdf's when out herding sheep and I'm sure it would also help to make some comment regarding your 1st letter.

 

More later.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok im happy with your 1st letter so no need to bring it up

get that emailed to TfL.

 

i would give it no more than 1 week before we send something extra if you get no reply.

 

court reply can be done oct 1st unless im missing something . on dates you have a good period to be a pest.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

copy/paste as text of an email

attach as PDf too.

 

put your case number in the subject line.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no??

it gives them an easy way to put your response in any files they might need/have for the future.

you'll just get a small fine and a warning letter i expect.

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you think?????:crazy:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no you are not repeating yourself, you are simply putting the same response in a PDf file as the text of your email.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good youve now got a line of communication.

 

Politely reply stating something like.

 

thank you replying to my email dated xxxxx and for your reply the contents of which are duly noted.

 

I can appreciated your stance and again reintegrate i am will to meet all costs etc to achieve an OOC.

 

I can also appreciate the company statement of how serious misuse of 60+ passes is, and again do not disagree, however as i have described, more than one card was contained within my wallet.

 

i did not open it to pass through the barrier and forgot the 60+ pass was also in there too along with my existing valid card. The matter of it being clearly distinguishable, had i opened my wallet, would have obviously caused me not to selected it and reminded me it was in there.

 

This was a simple human mistake, it was not and never would i, intentionally look to defraud anyone. My travel history of my existing card proves this, as does no other pattern of use of the 60+ pass.

 

I relation to your comments regarding professions and potential discriminatory practices, i highly agree. My explanation involving where my life is going was not intended to be viewed as a reason not to punish me.

 

i except i did wrong, but was merely indicating what allowing this offence to progress to court and what impact a potential criminal record would be, as opposed to an out of court settlement for me. Indeed i have seen like cases on the forums whereby another TfL prosecutor granted OOC sighting it was not a TfL policy to ruin someone's future over a one off sully mistake.

 

I thank you for taking the time and trouble in replying to me and reading this and again i apologise that my actions ever bought me to this predicament.

 

Yours sincerely

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Accompanied???

 

Put the top thank you lines back

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

settlement .   missing end of para 2

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legal costs? 

 

Full out the sjp as advised then. 

We will write again before your appearance.

 

Treat the form as if the judge is not aware of previous Comms 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

plead guilty

state you want to come to court. (your ultimate aim is to show remorse directly to the judge and of course if OOC has not been reached on the day, try a personal approach to the TfL prosecutions team there and then before the hearing , make sure you have payment methods with you..)

use the box at 4.2 to further plea too, regardless, and how a one off mistake would ruin your future etc etc).

 

use the threads indicated above and others here (use our enhanced google search box ... grovelling letter or what have you) to construct such a letter (and for want of future readers DONT reply as this OP did!!) GROVEL!!! BEG!! etc etc

 

pop it up here 1st if you wish as TEXT.

 

you have till the 5oct though i'd get an email in ASAP. it might take a couple...NO do NOT ring but certainly make yourself a PEST!!

its very rare for a one off mistake to result in a criminal record and not achieve an OOC.

 

How you reply and by what method is upto you. We don't recommend which soap powder to use 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to TFL SJPN - accidently tried to use wrong pass

you received that weeks ago.

we've told you atleast twice how to respond to it

 

you dont need the extra cost of legal representation - we've answered that before too.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

an option on the SJP forum asks if you wish to attend on the day to plead in person

as already advised you should tick this option ...no.3. i think.

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...