I have followed accordingly

Thank you

The deadline to submit plea was 5 Oct. I pleaded guilty. I have since sent 2 letters after receiving the SJPN. These were submitted prior to submitting the SJPN. I was told that their position is unchanged and I should respond to the SJPN, which I have done so. Is there legroom to write another letter? How should I go about it? If the dates have materialised, would it help me more or less?

Should I be going by myself and reaffirm what I have already said in writing?

Hello, I have been summoned to attend court on 23 November 2022 I am disappointed it has escalated this far. It would be helpful to know if I should seek a representative. Thank you

can you confirm the following i should fill paper form rather than the online form i should plead guilty i should make an appearance in court

Hi @dx100uk This is the response. I will find it hard to meet legal costs Thank you for your email. Our position is unchanged from the previous email. Please respond to the single justice procedure notice that was previously posted out to you. Regards

Dear Thank you replying to my email dated 13 September 2022, the contents of which are duly noted. I can appreciate your stance and again reiterate that I am willing to meet all costs to achieve an out of court settlement. I can also appreciate the company statement of how serious misuse of 60+ passes is, and again do not disagree, however as I have described, more than one card was contained within my wallet. I did not open it to check through at the heat of rush hour and forgot that the 60+ pass was also in there too along with my existing card. This was a simple human mistake, it was not and never would I, intentionally look to defraud anyone. In relation to your comments regarding professions and potential discriminatory practices, I highly agree. My explanation involving where my life is going was not intended to be viewed as a reason not to punish me. I accept I did wrong, but was merely indicating what allowing this offence to progress to court and what impact a potential criminal record would be, as opposed to an out of court settlement for me. Indeed, I have seen like cases on the forums whereby another TfL prosecutor granted an 'out of court', citing it was not a TfL policy to ruin someone's future over a one-off, genuinely silly mistake. My travel history of my existing card proves this, as does no other pattern of use of the 60+ pass. I thank you for taking the time and trouble in replying to me and reading this and again I apologise that my actions ever bought me to this predicament. Yours Sincerely, Ready?

Ready to send?

Dear Thank you replying to my email dated 13 September 2022, the contents of which are duly noted. I can appreciate your stance and again reiterate that I am willing to meet all costs to achieve an out of court. I can also appreciate the company statement of how serious misuse of 60+ passes is, and again do not disagree, however as I have described, more than one card was contained within my wallet. I did not open it to check through at the heat of rush hour and forgot that the 60+ pass was also in there too along with my existing card. This was a simple human mistake, it was not and never would I, intentionally look to defraud anyone. In relation to your comments regarding professions and potential discriminatory practices, I highly agree. My explanation involving where my life is going was not intended to be viewed as a reason not to punish me. I accept I did wrong, but was merely indicating what allowing this offence to progress to court and what impact a potential criminal record would be, as opposed to an out of court settlement for me. Indeed, I have seen like cases on the forums whereby another TfL prosecutor granted an 'out of court', citing it was not a TfL policy to ruin someone's future over a one-off, genuinely silly mistake. My travel history of my existing card proves this, as does no other pattern of use of the 60+ pass. I thank you for taking the time and trouble in replying to me and reading this and again I apologise that my actions ever bought me to this predicament. Yours Sincerely,

Ah yes thank you missed this part by miscopying Will changed accompanied

Revised it... Dear I can appreciate your stance and again reiterate that I am willing to meet all costs to achieve an out of court. I can also appreciate the company statement of how serious misuse of 60+ passes is, and again do not disagree, however as I have described, I accompanied more than one card within my wallet. I did not open it to check through and forgot the 60+ pass was also in there too along with my existing card. This was a simple human mistake, it was not and never would I, intentionally look to defraud anyone. In relation to your comments regarding professions and potential discriminatory practices, I highly agree. My explanation involving where my life is going was not intended to be viewed as a reason not to punish me. I accept I did wrong, but was merely indicating what allowing this offence to progress to court and what impact a potential criminal record would be, as opposed to an out of court settlement for me. Indeed, I have seen like cases on the forums whereby another TfL prosecutor granted an 'out of court', citing it was not a TfL policy to ruin someone's future over a one-off, genuinely silly mistake. My travel history of my existing card proves this, as does no other pattern of use of the 60+ pass. I thank you for taking the time and trouble in replying to me and reading this and again i apologise that my actions ever bought me to this predicament. Yours Sincerely,

Thank you dx for relieving my concerns

Hello, I received a damning response today which I am more disappointed of Dear, Thank you for your email. As I have previously mentioned before, the 60+ pass you tendered for your journey is clearly distinguishable from an ordinary Oystercard. The onus is on the passenger to ensure they are in possession of a valid ticket and to take reasonable steps to ensure they do this. The misuse of concessionary passes is a widespread problem within the London area and any prosecution is in the public interest. I note what you have to say regarding your personal circumstances concerning a potential conviction. It would be inappropriate for TfL to pursue a policy not to prosecute in certain types of professions which would lead to discriminatory policy for certain professionals as opposed to other members of the public. You should now answer the single justice procedure paperwork previously sent to you. Regards

DBS certificate for teaching to corroborate letter