Jump to content


DCa and MBNA CCA return - 2 CCA's - which one is right?


Bluesky90
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1382 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, just wondering if anyone can help? 

I requested the CCA for a credit card debt from the debt collection agency, which they provided (although it's a very poor copy with really tiny writing), along with a generic list of terms and conditions. They also sent some other documents which suggested the account was opened earlier than the date on the CCA. 

 

The account is quite old and I couldn't remember when I opened it so I put in a SAR with the original creditors. However, they have provided 2 CCA's, one that's the same as the one from the DCA and another, different CCA signed and dated a few months before that one. This is an even poorer copy than the other one and has some of it cut off, including nearly all of my name and address (both CCA's attached).

 

I'm just wondering if the later CCA from the DCA is valid? If not, I understand that they could probably easily request a copy of the earlier agreement from the original creditors, but as it's such a poor copy and doesn't show my name and address does that mean it's unlikely to be enforceable anyway?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget the one in the sar...thats your secret...

 

can you redact thing properly please

you've left pers details showing everywhere.

had to delete them all

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to DCa and MBNA CCA return - 2 CCA's - which one is right?

bogroll and woefully short of what a cca return should contain

 

who's the DCA and when did you last pay on the MBNA card and what is the defaulted date from your credit file?

 

and why did you send the CCA request to...??

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, it was sold to Aktiv Kapital but PRA are dealing with it. Last paid to MBNA in 2013 and then paying PRA ever since. 

 

Defaulted in 2013 so now off my credit report.

 

I requested the CCA as wanted to do a full and final, as it's an old account I thought there was a good chance they might not have it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

shame you've been blindly paying a powerless dca since 2013 running the Statute barred debt to infinity.

who ever told you to do that?

 

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

and has

ZERO legal powers on any debt no matter what it's type.

 

PRA are simple the new name for AK.

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

did i say that?

 

read my post again..

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...