Jump to content


LLoyds 'Cardholder Protection Plan'?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2495 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Are congratulations in order yet Ford?

 

What's Best for You?

 

 

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

 

Alliance & Leicester Moneyclaim issued 20/1/07 £225.50 full settlement received 29 January 2007

Smile £1,075.50 + interest Email request for payment 24/5/06 received £1,000.50 14/7/06 + £20 30/7/06

Yorkshire Bank Moneyclaim issued 21/6/06 £4,489.39 full settlement received 26 January 2007

:p

 

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations!!

 

I hope it was worth the wait!! :p

 

What's Best for You?

 

 

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

 

Alliance & Leicester Moneyclaim issued 20/1/07 £225.50 full settlement received 29 January 2007

Smile £1,075.50 + interest Email request for payment 24/5/06 received £1,000.50 14/7/06 + £20 30/7/06

Yorkshire Bank Moneyclaim issued 21/6/06 £4,489.39 full settlement received 26 January 2007

:p

 

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

to say though atm;

a huge thanks to all who freely gave time to give excellent help on the thread, and to the free helpful info re on cag. (and to all that freely give excellent help generally across cag. and to genuine posters who come to cag for help re their personal circumstances which in turn makes everyone all more experienced/aware/knowledgeable etc...)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've put in the time too and helped countless people Ford. Nice to see you get a return for all your endeavours,

 

What's Best for You?

 

 

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

 

Alliance & Leicester Moneyclaim issued 20/1/07 £225.50 full settlement received 29 January 2007

Smile £1,075.50 + interest Email request for payment 24/5/06 received £1,000.50 14/7/06 + £20 30/7/06

Yorkshire Bank Moneyclaim issued 21/6/06 £4,489.39 full settlement received 26 January 2007

:p

 

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've put in the time too and helped countless people Ford. Nice to see you get a return for all your endeavours,

 

Yes, I agree with Caro.

 

Good stuff Ford :)

 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers guys. :)

alas though, as posted earlier in thread, its not mine. but, i'll be asking for a 65% fee...:lol:

maybe not quite over just yet. as seems usual, some of the cruds calcs seem not quite right...

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Yes

Lots of Lloyd's and cap1 claims in the early days were later revisited by the claimers or the oc with more money coming back

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes

Lots of Lloyd's and cap1 claims in the early days were later revisited by the claimers or the oc with more money coming back

excellent. cheers.

it seems they did the int calc re it being a zero bal each mth. but, that may not be so...awaiting the statements.

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

to add

it's still within the ombuds time limit.

the complaints were upheld by loyds. and payment has just been made to the current a/c.

and it is re the interest calcs that may still be in issue.

it can still then be revisited re the int calcs if needs be?

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

hi

can anyone help me understand calculating a banks ppi refund award re a closed cr card, the balance being paid off prior to it being closed.

i read that the a/c shld be 'reconstructed' so as to take off the premiums paid and its associated (compound?) interest and then 8% simple interest paid on the difference.

or shld it be the amount of premiums paid plus its associated card interest plus the 8% interest? or is it the same!

Would anyone have a rough idea of what an award amount would roughly be re a prem of around 7£/mth being paid over 10 years at around 1.67%/mth, the monthly balance never being paid off in full afaik until a couple of months before it was closed.

:???:

thanks in advance

Edited by Ford
edit

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you only get 8% statint where the AC enters credit balance within any particular month

the very best sheet to use is the fosrunning sheet.

though that need a lot of info putting in but gets the job done.

 

you need to remember that monthly int is not APR, which all the sheets need

so you'd have to calc that

http://www.stoozing.com/calculator/apr-rate-converter.php

 

if you want a rough guide the use the fosci sheet.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

but you'll need to set the claim to date to the last date that they charged their int APR from.

 

then using the statint sheet take the total from the fosci sheet and enter that as a one entry whole figure dated the day after they stopped contractural int.

 

I could help?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the quick reply.

i did start a quick go at that sheet earlier but it seemed to be coming up too high!

the bank did do an award but am not sure now if it is roughly correct or not in the circs. i'll post back up tomorrow.

this was some of the info i was looking at

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi/redress.html#redresscc

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

in this case, the a/c was closed around 10 yrs ago and ran for about 10 yrs. the complainant only has a few statements atm, but afatk the bal was always around the amount shown resulting in the related prem.

 

from that fos info, the difference in with and without ppi and its related card interest shld be calculated and awarded (ie the total prems paid + the compounded card interest)?

and then stat interest applied to that amount for the loss of use of that money?

 

the bank have stated that they do not hold all info and so may have made certain assumptions re being a non max payer. it has awarded an amount described as 'the difference in payments made', and then an amount of stat simple interest. but am not sure whether that diff includes all the prems paid and the appropriate card interest.

 

it appears not, going by adsuk recent thread with figures there for eg.

 

any further thoughts atm?

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you sent an sar?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes (but it may not come back in time), and for breakdown.

 

ps, going by ads_uk's figures, it poss shld be around half of his figures re prems and interest.

 

i guess also that an award wld take into account at least the min payment being made which wld cover at least that mths interest on the statement. and, anything over the min goes towards reducing the balance.

 

but, wld such over the min go to purchases first, or are the premiums regarded as part of that re order of reduction.

 

and then factoring in that the next mths ppi premium will be added to the balance and therefore increasing the interest proportionately following the previous mths statement interest being paid!

 

am thinking then re compounding its a case of taking the difference between the proportionate interest being paid off, and the proportionate interest added next month re the increase in the balance caused by the next mths premium?

if that makes sense :)

 

no idea, its doing my head :frusty:

 

maybe time for a few beers and then a fight with a bus :)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

in time for what?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

'foslink3.gif will consider claims over 6 months since the final response in exceptional circumstances, what these are is not clear ...'

 

from a post in adsuk thread.

just for general ref, some fos info re with some eg's. and other info

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/six-month-time-limit.htm#10

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ford just send the FOS customer questionnaire for now to them.

more can be fwded later

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that was just for general ref for anyone looking in concerned about deadlines following that post comment re.

it will be registered (via the fos complaint register form) in time if needs be.

would the fos still need a question're if the bank have already upheld the fact that it was missold, and a complaint issue now is just re the accuracy of the amount of the award?

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...