Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

NatWest - a few questions, and will they force me to use it to pay off my outstanding debts?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3687 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

you should wait

 

but certainly document what has happened dates/times/names

for when you do goto the FOS.

 

as has been said

this is very typical of ALL banks now mostly.

 

they ask loaded questions to wriggle out of it

by your answers.

 

never ever talk on the phone.

 

as for the complaint.

 

send an email to the CEO.

 

no good doing this by phone.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Right an update and a query.

 

Good news is NatWest has agreed to uphold all of my complaints on both my credit card and my loans.

 

On the loans,

I have asked for a detailed breakdown and will then match it off against my own calculations.

 

I needed to know how much PPI I had paid as quite a few of the loans were paid off early

with other loans and NatWest is saying that when the loans were paid off,

the outstanding PPI was refunded at the time.

 

On the credit card, I had an offer from NatWest over a month ago.

I wrote back to say that the calculations were incorrect and gave them a breakdown

of what the correct calculations should have been.

 

I gave them 28 days to acknowledge and make payment of the correct amount.

28 days has since passed and

 

I spoke to them on the phone today to find out what has happened.

 

Apparently they just ignored the letter and have used the total refund based on their calculations, not mine,

including interest, against my outstanding debts.

 

 

So my questions are:

  1. Can they use the interest payments against my outstanding debts? They have asserted that they can but my understanding was that they must pay the interest directly to me.
  2. What do I do if they will not accept my calculations despite a detailed breakdown with evidence to prove it?
  3. Are they correct in telling me that when a loan was paid off early, the rest of the PPI was cancelled rather than rolled up into the next loan?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. they cannot use the 8% stat int to off set.

 

2. you tell them so then fwd the whole complaint to the FOS.

 

3. you need to prove this by looking at the statements.

 

if they/you have no evidence you were rebated, then I cant see how they can claim that happen

we know NatWest have not rebate PPI but rolled it over under refinance in the past.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In answer to your questions;

 

1) They can offset a refund of interest that you have paid against the debt but not the 8% interest

 

2) If you believe it is incorrect then you can ask for their calculations and if not forthcoming raise the case with FOS

 

3) Natwest loans offered a non pro-rata refund on cancellation .

Essentially some of the money was refunded, but some wasn't

and was therefore rolled into the next loan e.g PPI was £1000,

cancelled half way through the term.

 

Rather than £500 being refunded (half the premium), perhaps £300 would be refunded

and you are therefore borrowing an extra £200 on the next loan (the rolled up PPI)

- (NB this is a very simplified example and these aren't the actual figures, its just to illustrate the principle)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks for the advice

- I've asked NatWest for a breakdown of how they calculated the loan PPI and I will check it off against that and my SAR paperwork.

 

Regarding the credit card,

 

I spoke to the FOS and they advised that companies are entitled to use the entire amount including statutory interest to pay off outstanding debts if they so wish.

 

They did however say that if NatWest have told me one thing then done another, I could escalate it to the FOS.

 

I have spoken to NatWest credit cards again today (I asked for a manager call back)

and they advised they would respond to my dispute over the amount within the next few days

but they wouldn't change their decision to use the whole amount to pay off my debt.

 

What they did say is that it is different for NatWest loans

- and NatWest loans have confirmed to me that they do send a cheque for the interest.

 

One final note regarding credit cards,

 

I created my own spreadsheet for the calculations as none of the ones I've found on here or elsewhere online

seemed to exactly calculate a refund including card interest charged on PPI premiums.

 

Having spoken to the FOS I do need to amend the formulas slightly as I'd mistakenly added the 8% statutory interest

from the date the premium was added to my statement rather than when it was paid off.

 

However once I've done this I will share on the site in case others may wish to use it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is diff and confusing to have a CC & a loan PPI reclaim running on the same thread.

 

ALL of a PPI reclaim or PENALTY charges reclaim on a credit card CAN be used to offset

as in all effect, the sums owed are 'notional' in the outstanding balance.

 

this is the sheet you should be using for the CC

 

This third spreadsheet is a calculator that will work out a fos based PPI award on a Revolving Credit Account such as a credit card. It will also work out the additional 8% interest awarded where the account moves into credit as a result of the removal of the PPI from the account. Be aware that you will need ALL of the account statements for this spreadsheet to give the correct result.

 

FosRunningPPI v102.xls

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I did start a separate thread and they got merged into one again so I thought I needed to discuss all my issues in one thread.

 

Thanks for the spreadsheet, it's better than the ones I had seen. The way I had done it was to have a column for the monthly interest rate but this one seems a bit simpler so I will use that.

 

A further issue that has arisen out of all this is that when I received my SAR file, it became clear that NatWest has lost the vast majority of my credit agreements. Shall I start a new thread as I'd like some advice on whether I could use this to help me negotiate a settlement figure? (I'm going to sell my flat to try and wipe the slate clean but am not sure the equity will cover the entire debt).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...