Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Phil and Alison v The Co-op ***WON***


phatram
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5900 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

£5 each? He's having himself on a bit....

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 214
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ah but how do you prove that he's said it? Unless you recorded the phonecall.....

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just read your topic as I also want to make a claim against my loan account, my account is with Nat West, I have already claimed back the charges from them back in January and then I found a loan agreement which clearly states purpose of loan "Consolidation of Bank Debt"

 

Like you have mentioned there does not seem to be much information on how to go about claiming

 

Here is my topic

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/90429-consolidation-bank-debt-loan.html?highlight=debt+management+loan

 

Any suggestions phatram would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

COOP are refusing to pay our claim cos charges are from over 6 years ago.

Has anyone successfully claimed back charges from the COOP that go back further than six years?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just received a phone call from DAVID SPENCER at the Co-Op concerning our account.

I asked him how much copy statements are and how far back can I order them from, to which he replied

ALL OF THEM FROM YOUR ACCOUNT OPENING, ITS ARCHIVED!!!.

I am b***dy fuming.

This proves they do not comply and did not comply with our S.A.R - (Subject Access Request).

I am reporting this to the information commissioner.

 

 

Well we know they got them, they just dont want to give us them and will use all sorts of tactics to not give them out.

It will only work if the commisioners get off their collective backsides and order the banks to release ALL of the information. THe odd little fine for non compliance is a drop in the ocean to the banks and worth every penny for the odd one that complains.

 

CM

Templates Library

 

GE Capital Won

Capital 0ne Won

Northern rock Claim stayed working on negotiation

HSBC personal claim 1 ''WON''.

£1800 plus full stat interest plus costs.

Claim started 14/02/07 offer 3/07/07

 

Next:Coming soon to a thread near you! :)

HSBC personal Part 2 'return of the Celicaman'

HSBC business 1 ' my empire strikes back' N1 claim POC in progress after usual offensive offer from bank

HSBC business 2 'attack of the Celicaman'

HSBC business claim 3 'bank account menace'

HSBC business 4 'Revenge of the CAG Member' the final insult ....................... 'Maybe'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I suggest you write to David Spencer and get him to write on paper what he verbally told you as this helps your case in the long term (registered post letter). Good luck with your claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone have david Spencers e mail and direct telephone number.

Once you have that information start a thread getting all CAG members to do the Co-op forum a favour and bombard him. Might be best to make use of the masses on this forum.

He will wriggle with one letter and deny it. Put them under pressure.

And as Celicaman says go to Commissioner with the evidence.

If we were lucky enough to get an admission like that, on the BoS forum, we would come to you.

Give it some thought!! Anything to lose??

Good luck!!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

10/06/2007

COOPERATIVE BANK

P O BOX 101

1 BALLOON STREET

MANCHESTER

M60 4 EP

ACCOUNT XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX

Dear Mr Spencer,

On Saturday 2nd June 2007 at approximately 15.50 hours I received a telephone call from yourself concerning the above account.

During our conversation you stated to me that I could have ANY copy statement from the account being opened in 1983 for a fee of £5.00 per copy. Later in the call I asked you to confirm this, which you did.

I would be most grateful if you would now confirm this to me in writing, giving details of how much this will cost. I would be grateful if this information is sent out to me by return of post or within 7 days.

Yours sincerely

Mr X XXXXXXXXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it possible to do more than one SAR with the same bank?

The COOP have in our opinion not complied but we feel they might wriggle out of it because we only put our joint account number on the SAR.

They hold info on us for credit cards, loans and bank accounts but only supplied the usual 6 years bank statements at first (now got an extra year).

Thanks for any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I'm aware you can only send ONE account specific S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) in a six month period.

Now if this is for a different account then I can't see why not.

You can send one SAR and fee to cover all of your accounts, just list all the numbers at the begining or state various accounts to get everything for your address and name.

 

If you are going for a various then make sure you mention that this should cover all accounts heldby the bank including personal, joint, loan and credit cards.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really depends on what your original said.

If you only asked for 6 years and they have supplied then I think your on sticky ground, but if you didn't specify a time then yes.

 

Failing that do they have an internet banking section you can ask.

I had a good response from LTSB's internet banking guys and managed to get 10 years worth of statements fom them.

Took a while, but it was worth it in the end.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Our original SAR was the template on here.

We have since told them we do not believe they have fully complied and today a letter has been delivered giving them 7 days or face court action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just spent 34 minutes on the phone and I was told DAVID SPENCER was wrong and we can only have 6 years statements.

SO Co-Op, HOW COME WE HAVE ALREADY HAD 7 YEARS STATEMENTS?

I told them someones lying to me, but they said it's not lying, I was misinformed!!

Ridiculous!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

19/06/07

 

 

HELEN RAFTERY

CASEWORK AND ADVICE MANAGER

INFORMATION COMMISIONER’S OFFICE

WYCLIFFE HOUSE

WATER LANE

WILMSLOW

CHESHIRE

SK9 5AF

 

 

REFERENCE: xxxxxxxxxx

 

 

Dear Ms Raftery

 

Further to my letter of the 10 June 2007, I have today been in contact with the Co-Operative Bank, via the telephone, to Lorraine Stephenson in the Managed Accounts Department. I was told that Mr Spencer “mis-informed” me when he said that I could have copy statements going back to the onset of my account. Ms Stephenson also told me that any information on any of my accounts only goes back 6 years. I know this is untrue as I have already been sent – unwittingly or not – information outside of that 6 year period.

 

I have already received 7 years’ bank statements and copies of loan agreements from 1998 and 1999. Surely this proves that The Co-Operative Bank is lying to me and I would like to know what action you are going to take with regards to this matter.

 

Please find enclosed copies of the aforementioned loan agreements for your perusal.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr xxx xxxxxxxx

Enc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Co-op have now fully complied (in their opinion) by providing a full SAR, eg, loans, cards, etc.

Whilst speaking to Lorraine Stephenson on the phone, she informed me that ALL information over 6 years old ''drops off the system''.

This I don't believe because in the info are my wifes credit card statements, which believe it or not, go back to 1999 !!!!

So thats 8 years, is it not?

We feel we have been lied to at every stage since we started this in October.

Why and how are they allowed to get away with this?

They are a disgrace.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...