Jump to content


Gyms forced to end 'unfair' exit clauses in contracts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4054 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Health clubs have been forced to make it easier and cheaper for customers to cancel gym contracts.

 

Several have agreed to change the ‘unfair’ small print that can lock members into deals as long as two years – and make it difficult for them to quit without penalty fees.

 

Gym-goers now have ‘clearer and more flexible’ terms to ensure they have greater rights to cancel following an investigation by the Office of Fair Trading.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2289978/Gyms-forced-end-unfair-exit-clauses-contracts-make-easier-cheaper-members-quit.html

Anthrax alert at debt collectors caused by box of doughnuts

 

Make sure you do not post anything which identifies you. Although we can remove certain things from the site unless it's done in a timely manner everything you post will appear in Google cache & we do not have any control over that.

 

Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

17 Port & Maritime Regiment RCT

Link to post
Share on other sites

deserves to be a sticky!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

all should be more 'fair' as exposed, otherwise they would risk falling foul of the OFT and/or the high court case mentioned. suppose though it could be up to them in consideration of the poss risks against.

Edited by Ford

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...