Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

comet faulty tv


khunjerry
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4335 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently purchased i JVC 42" tv from comet 06/07/12. 12 days later on 19/07/12 it packed up, took it back to the shop and they wanted nothing to do with it and infact the one member of staff (manageress) was qiute rude.Called the comet help line (10p a min) vented my anger at the man on the other end who booked an engineer to come out on the 24/07/12.I also asked to speak to a supervisor, put on hold for another 9 mins then cut off. On the 24th i waited and finally called the help desk again o get a time for the engineer only to find out that they had not booked one for that day. told that they would call me back to sort out the problem and as you can guess no call came. rebooked myself for today, called this morning to get a rough time, 17 mins and 33 secs later told anytime between 8am -6pm. feeling that i am being given the run around and comet do not care. i do not want it repaired as it is only a 12days old when it broke down,do not want a replacement as i want nothing to do with Comet anmore. any suggestions ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi khun ,

 

Welcome to the real world of "COMET Service" an absolute disgrace !

 

To be treated like that by the Retail Store regarding a Product bought in good faith that fails after 12 Days is not on .

 

Given the fact you have returned the faulty Tv to the Retail Store and they are not interested in resolving the problem by offering an Exchange or Refund is shocking this should have been resolved immediately and to be fobbed off like this is unbelievable .

 

Send an email straight away to the Directors Office ,

 

bob.darke@comet.co.uk

 

State the facts and the attitude of the members of staff when you returned the faulty Tv to the Retail Store , they are at the ham here and they know it .

 

Hopefully if you get an Engineer visit today you will be offered an exchange or refund anything other is totally unacceptable if the Tv is faulty .

 

(This could and should have been confirmed instore in the first instance and the problem resolved to your satisfaction )

Regards

GorgieBoy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently purchased i JVC 42" tv from comet 06/07/12. 12 days later on 19/07/12 it packed up, took it back to the shop and they wanted nothing to do with it and infact the one member of staff (manageress) was qiute rude.Called the comet help line (10p a min) vented my anger at the man on the other end who booked an engineer to come out on the 24/07/12.I also asked to speak to a supervisor, put on hold for another 9 mins then cut off. On the 24th i waited and finally called the help desk again o get a time for the engineer only to find out that they had not booked one for that day. told that they would call me back to sort out the problem and as you can guess no call came. rebooked myself for today, called this morning to get a rough time, 17 mins and 33 secs later told anytime between 8am -6pm. feeling that i am being given the run around and comet do not care. i do not want it repaired as it is only a 12days old when it broke down,do not want a replacement as i want nothing to do with Comet anmore. any suggestions ?
sorry to hear of the issues your having with your tv. Companies will always look to inspect an item (legally entitled) to determine the cause of the fault. This ensures the fault isnt due to not following manufacturer guidelines or due to misuse. It doesnt suprise me with the lack of communication though with ref to visits etc. Generally under 28 days comet will confirm fault and exchnge tv,although a refund can be requested. In addition if they suggest a repair,refuse this under Sale of Goods Act 1979, as the tv clearly isnt fit for purpose or durable when sold. Also as tv is so new (under 6 months old) it is the responsibility of comet to prove it is fit for purpose-they cannot prove this in this instance
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sprag ,

 

The Tv purchased by khun was 12 Days old when it failed well within "Under 28 Days " old when he returned the product to the Retail Store as faulty .

 

If you worked for COMET you will know that this could and should have been dealt with by the Retail Store in the first instance as the Store could have confirmed the Tv was indeed faulty and dealt with the issue accordingly which they have NOT done , they have just passed the buck .

 

And Yes we all know that COMET is in a bad way , but this approach in dealing with a customer is shocking , once again another example of the money is in the till we are not interested !

 

And Yes New "Under 6 months old" we are not talking about here the Tv failed after 12 days and was returned to the Retail Store and the Service khun has received is appalling.

Regards

GorgieBoy

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to the selling store inspecting the tv,as they are not technically qualified the store are not in a position to confirm what or how the fault happened. Hence the need for a qualified engineer inspection. Legally a retailer can complete a full inspection (as in this case). On inspection if a fault is confirmed and is not as a result then a refund or exchange would and should be given. With ref to the 6 months I mentioned I was simply trying to highlight that if comet try to insist on a repair,to refuse this. In a court when an item is so new (up to 6 months) it is the retailors responsibility to prove that the said item is fit for puspose and durable when sold. Clearly in this case 12 days is not acceptable,therfore not fit for purpose or durable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Comet Retail Stores can at their discretion authorise an exchange or refund on a product that faults as in this case Under 28days .

 

The simple fact is they do not want to and are under pressure from those above not to replace refund or exchange anything once sold .

 

With regards to the qualified Engineer Inspection where are these guys ? as the last I heard the remaining few Skilled Engineers they have left are actually doing their last shift tomorrow Friday 27 July .

 

The only place they have left is at Skelmsdale which is not overflowing by any means with Skilled Engineers .

This Tv in question has not even got backup from the Manufacturer I would assume as it is a JVC in name only and is a COMET own Brand as such.

 

I am sure the site team guys can add weight to this and would agree that in this particular case a refund or exchange should have been offered in the first instance when khun returned the faulty 12 day old Tv to the Retail Store it would not be rocket science for a staff member to confirm an actual fault with the Tv and that the Product has not been accidently damaged in some way which could have resulted in a fault also .

Regards

GorgieBoy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...