Jump to content


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4414 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My wife has a court claim against Aquacard for charges, their date for AOS was 15th Feb so she requested judgement and it was issued 16th Feb, today received a defence from SCM that has been issued on 23rd Feb 7 days after the deadline, what is the chance that they will get the judgement set aside, also the defence is the usual drivel and a typical "fold before court" what would be the situation as wasted costs if they apply for a set aside and then settle before court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Where are things up to? have they filed a defense? Is it literally for just £12?

Do you have a website? Add the following code to add a link to The Consumer Action Group:

 

<a href="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk"><b><font color="#FF0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Consumer Action Group</font></b></a> - <font color="#FF9900" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Reclaim your rights as a consumer and reclaim your unfair bank charges! Free site with letter templates and helpful forum.</font>

 

_____________________________________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

i hope you are hitting them with CI

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The witness statement says at the end that the honourable judge should dismiss this case for abuse of process! I was under the impression that witness statements were only to give facts of their knowledge of the case not to give their opinions on legal matters, also says primo facie (legal latin), not something I would expect a Halifax line manager to know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...